On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:38 -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Karsten Bräckelmann"
> > > It seems like the size limit should be applied to the searchable parts of
> > > the email, not any attached images.
> >
> > This is rather unlikely to happen. There is *no* size limit in SA. There
> > is, however,
From: "Karsten Bräckelmann"
Sent: Wednesday, 2010/October/06 16:20
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:38 -0700, durwood wrote:
> Because it *is* filed already. Please first search bugzilla, then open
> a bug report.
Pinging this thread to see if there's been any progress or decision on
this
bug.
From: "durwood"
Sent: Wednesday, 2010/October/06 14:38
What amavisd-new finally did was to pass the first (x) bytes to SA so
?> that at least the spam didn't get a RBL free pass.
Nothing like that in spamd/spamc, but why not open a bug?
Because it *is* filed already. Please first search
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, durwood wrote:
> I too am starting to see quite a bit of spam that's *just* over the 500k
> threshold due to ~4K-sized image attached to the spam. It almost makes me
> wonder if they are doing this just to get it over the standard SpamAssassin
> threshold.
>
> It seems like the
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:38 -0700, durwood wrote:
> > Because it *is* filed already. Please first search bugzilla, then open
> > a bug report.
>
> Pinging this thread to see if there's been any progress or decision on this
> bug.
Wow, that thread's more than a year old. :) A lot of folks are li
t to get it over the standard SpamAssassin
threshold.
It seems like the size limit should be applied to the searchable parts of
the email, not any attached images.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-Max-msg-size-tp25095294p29901057.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:05 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> There was a discussion over on the amavisd-users group about this a
> while back.
> Spammers are starting to include HUGE images (what do they care how
> much processing the zombots do?)
Well, it does decrease their throughput, sending
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Ya I understand what you by not want to change this. I'll just a few more
Kb, never more then 1MB on total.
There was a discussion over on the amavisd-users group about this a
while back.
Spammers are starting to include HUGE images (what do they care how much
processi
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:03:12 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 22-Aug-2009, at 11:53, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Ya I understand what you by not want to change this. I'll just a
> > few more
> > Kb, never more then 1MB on total.
>
> OK, but keep in mind that the increase in processing time is not
> linea
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 19:03 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> Many of the meta_rules get very problematic with larger sizes.
Why would that be?
A meta rule is a logic evaluation with a fixed size and not being
performed against the body.
A plain RE based rule and a lot of the eval rules on the other hand
On 22-Aug-2009, at 11:53, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Ya I understand what you by not want to change this. I'll just a few
more
Kb, never more then 1MB on total.
OK, but keep in mind that the increase in processing time is not
linear. For example, scanning a 500K message might take four times as
> You can change the max message size i the way you launch spamc. BUT,
> you don't want to.
>
> No, really, you don't.
>
> Oh, fine, shoot yourself in the foot if you must.
>
> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size
> Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd
> -- a
On 22-Aug-2009, at 10:22, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Long time user of spamassassin (several years), but only now I noticed
something on my logs:
--
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
message
size (512000 bytes)
--
My question, where do I define this?
You can c
> On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:56:53 PM CEST, Benny Pedersen wrote
> > On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
> >> Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
> message
> ^
> ups
>
> >> size (512000 bytes)
>
> limit is in spamd how t
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:56:53 PM CEST, Benny Pedersen wrote
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
^
ups
size (512000 bytes)
limit is in spamd how to change see this in re
> On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
> > Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
> message
> > size (512000 bytes)
>
> how do you call spamassassin ?
>
> from amavisd, spamd, mailscanner, procmail ?
>
> spamassassin it self have no limit
Hum, s
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
size (512000 bytes)
how do you call spamassassin ?
from amavisd, spamd, mailscanner, procmail ?
spamassassin it self have no limit
--
xpoint
Howdy prople,
Long time user of spamassassin (several years), but only now I noticed
something on my logs:
--
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
size (512000 bytes)
--
My question, where do I define this?
/etc/default/spamassassin, doesn't ha
18 matches
Mail list logo
