>> What amavisd-new finally did was to pass the first (x) bytes to SA so ?> that at least the spam didn't get a RBL free pass. >> >> Nothing like that in spamd/spamc, but why not open a bug?
> Because it *is* filed already. Please first search bugzilla, then open > a bug report. Pinging this thread to see if there's been any progress or decision on this bug. I too am starting to see quite a bit of spam that's *just* over the 500k threshold due to ~4K-sized image attached to the spam. It almost makes me wonder if they are doing this just to get it over the standard SpamAssassin threshold. It seems like the size limit should be applied to the searchable parts of the email, not any attached images. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-Max-msg-size-tp25095294p29901057.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
