Jorge Bastos wrote:
Ya I understand what you by not want to change this. I'll just a few more
Kb, never more then 1MB on total.
There was a discussion over on the amavisd-users group about this a
while back.
Spammers are starting to include HUGE images (what do they care how much
processing the zombots do?)
Was it in order to make the spam bypass the default (400K in amavis),
500K in SA?
Bypassing it bypasses RBL checks, header checks, urlbi checks, bayes,
dcc, razor, everything.
Others have suggested that increasing that limit may create an
exponential increase in scan times.
What amavisd-new finally did was to pass the first (x) bytes to SA so
that at least the spam didn't get a RBL free pass.
Nothing like that in spamd/spamc, but why not open a bug?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
_________________________________________________________________________
