From: "durwood" <durw...@berzerker.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 2010/October/06 14:38
What amavisd-new finally did was to pass the first (x) bytes to SA so
?> that at least the spam didn't get a RBL free pass.
Nothing like that in spamd/spamc, but why not open a bug?
Because it *is* filed already. Please first search bugzilla, then open
a bug report.
Pinging this thread to see if there's been any progress or decision on
this
bug.
I too am starting to see quite a bit of spam that's *just* over the 500k
threshold due to ~4K-sized image attached to the spam. It almost makes me
wonder if they are doing this just to get it over the standard
SpamAssassin
threshold.
It seems like the size limit should be applied to the searchable parts of
the email, not any attached images.
As I see it, Durwood, you have a "default settings" problem. Perhaps you
need to customize a little. I've no problem with the concept because I
tend to change default passwords and things like that as well. (Default
passwords is what made Stuxnet so dangerous to SCADA tools from Seimans.)
{^_-}
