On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:41:24 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On tir 30 nov 2010 00:25:18 CET, RW wrote
>
> > I don't know if it's significant, but all four quoted emails have
> > one thing in common - they lack any usable received header before
> > the one
>
> in that case mue did not add requere
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michael Menge <
> michael.me...@zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> > we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
> > where i don't understand why the date is in future.
On 29.11.10 13:23, David Burns wrote:
> I've also seen some that I also don't unde
On tir 30 nov 2010 00:25:18 CET, RW wrote
I don't know if it's significant, but all four quoted emails have one
thing in common - they lack any usable received header before the one
in that case mue did not add requered Date: header
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On man 29 nov 2010 22:23:57 CET, David Burns wrote
I've been setting the scores for those to 0 for a long time, but your post
makes me hope that maybe there's a better way?
there was 2 servers, one with 3.3.1 and a older with 3.2.3, only the
first is fixed with that date problem, if you can p
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:49:17 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 29.11.10 15:39, Michael Menge wrote:
> > we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
> > where i don't understand why the date is in future.
> >
> > Could you help me to understand what i miss, or help to
> > so
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michael Menge <
michael.me...@zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
> where i don't understand why the date is in future.
>
>
I've also seen some that I also don't understand. I've also seen some FPs
tha
On 29.11.10 15:39, Michael Menge wrote:
> we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
> where i don't understand why the date is in future.
>
> Could you help me to understand what i miss, or help to
> solve the bug if it is a bug?.
>
> We use sendmail 8.13.6, spamass-milter 0.3.1 a
Hi,
we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
where i don't understand why the date is in future.
Could you help me to understand what i miss, or help to
solve the bug if it is a bug?.
We use sendmail 8.13.6, spamass-milter 0.3.1 and spamassassin 3.3.1
Below are the relevant
