On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:41:24 +0100 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> On tir 30 nov 2010 00:25:18 CET, RW wrote > > > I don't know if it's significant, but all four quoted emails have > > one thing in common - they lack any usable received header before > > the one > > in that case mue did not add requered Date: header > The rules uses the time difference between the date header and the closest matching (non-discarded) received header.
