> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michael Menge <
> michael.me...@zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> > we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules
> > where i don't understand why the date is in future.

On 29.11.10 13:23, David Burns wrote:
> I've also seen some that I also don't understand.  I've also seen some FPs
> that I do understand, but explaining to my users that they need to ask
> their corespondents to set their PC's clock and timezone correctly does not
> seem to be good customer service.

Well, if you call requiring of proper setup (because DATE_IN_FUTURE is just
what spammers do to get their mail displayes first) no good customer
service, then you can't provide good customer service. If they send their
e-mail to different address spamassassin runs on, will you ask remote admin
to disable these rules?

> I've been setting the scores for those to 0 for a long time, but your post
> makes me hope that maybe there's a better way?

there's no better way than asking explain customers that bad setup of
computer time/timezone is a bad setup which can result in their mails
being classified as spam.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist
"So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton

Reply via email to