Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
From:"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:43:46 -0700
To:
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: IncrediMail (5002253) is not a real e-mail client. You'
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Duane Hill wrote:
> Sorry for blowing this thread way off its topic. :-|
alt.spamassassin.recovery?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411
At 05:43 PM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
Top Posting is putting the textAnd fubars who complain
of your reply above the quoted text. excessively about top posting
Bottom posting (as I am doing) is get replies that are side
putting your reply below the original posted.
quo
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and
From: "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash
they usually accompany.
Heute (05.06.2006/02:52 Uhr) schrieb Duane Hill,
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
>> Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
>> cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
>> IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash
>> th
Heute (05.06.2006/02:42 Uhr) schrieb jdow,
> And YOU are trying to be a system administrator, Wayne?
> Give me a BREAK!
> {+_+}
You are right @jdow - LOL
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Man umgebe mich mit Luxu
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash
they usually accompany.
{+_+}
That's why I love Pine. Strictl
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any
other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the
emails that were sent before??
Do I ha
Do I have control over where they post to?
How do I control that?
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Jim Knuth
Date: 06/04/06 13:58:51
To: WFGB Team
Cc: Peter P. Benac; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
Heute (04.06.2006
A checking.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230
html#a4704507
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Network and Systems Project M
On 4 Jun 2006, at 18:35, WFGB Team wrote:
Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a
quote on that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin
detecting our own emails as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and
therefore closing out the thread.
All uppercase "SP
WFGB Team schreef:
Hi,
Please reread some of the comments you got. Your mails are delivered to
other mail servers. These servers may also employ SpamAssassin. If your
mails were being stopped or flagged on their way out by your own setup,
think about their fate on the other side...
Thunderbir
Heute (04.06.2006/20:43 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team,
> The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way.
> There is nothing I can do about that.
> Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails
> that were sent before??
> Do I have control over wh
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any
other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the
emails that were sent before??
Do I have control over where they post to?
How
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Jim Knuth
Date: 06/04/06 13:58:51
To: WFGB Team
Cc: Peter P. Benac; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
Heute (04.06.2006/19:35 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team,
> Yes, we have someone looking i
Heute (04.06.2006/19:35 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team,
> Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on
> that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails
> as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and therefore closing out the thread.
>
> Wayne
. Benac
Date: 06/04/06 13:28:48
To: spectacularstuff
Subject: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
That is not solved.. All you did was mask the symptom!!
Your DNS is screwed up and screwed up bad.
>
> Thank you everyone for your quotes, efforts and time involved. We
> actually
&g
Thank you everyone for your quotes, efforts and time involved. We actually
have this issue resolved now. Created a batch to interface in with
Smartermail to bypass the SA checking.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230
WFGB Team wrote on Sat, 3 Jun 2006 23:22:07 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time):
PLEASE STOP SENDING PICTURES AND HTML TO THE LIST.
> 0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
> 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag
> 1.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY:
Wayne,
Pro bono, here's the way to get SmarterMail to bypass SpamAssassin for
authenticated users.
BACKGROUND after playing around with SM for a few minutes
--
Like many/most MTAs, SM writes two spool files for every e-mail. One
is the message header/body, the other is the message
> I usually don't top quote, but folks, this is a troll..
No, it's not.
Difficult to distinguish between people totally out of their depth and
people here to cause harm. Wayne came to get help with what is a
totally foreign system (as he is a hardware repair guy) and was
promptly gi
t may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
----
Subject:
Re: Re[2]: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
From:
"WFGB Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Jun 2006 23:22:07 -0400 (
n attempting to join. It kept telling me communication error so I figured I would wait until later to see if it was an issue on my end or on their end.
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Sanford Whiteman
Date: 06/03/06 20:09:26
To: WFGB Team; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
n attempting to join. It kept telling me communication error so I figured I would wait until later to see if it was an issue on my end or on their end.
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Sanford Whiteman
Date: 06/03/06 20:09:26
To: WFGB Team; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
> I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
> forum but they believe this is SA issue.
P.S. You didn't start *a new thread* on their forum, which is as much
community-supported as vendor-supported. This is not being thorough,
for what seems like an urgent issue.
--Sa
13:47:18
To: WFGB Team; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re[2]: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
> I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
> forum but they believe this is SA issue.
It is and it isn't. The fact that they don't
> If SMFilter adds its own headers, couldn't you just write a custom
> rule for SA that gives any message with those headers a negative
> score?
SMFilter doesn't add anything; SM does add an "authenticated" header.
But rather than plunge Wayne into SA rules -- which are still the
wrong
> I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
> forum but they believe this is SA issue.
It is and it isn't. The fact that they don't have a simple way of
skipping their external test (and they have had many, many bugs over
the past few years relating to incom
ssage---
From: Stephen Sloan
Date: 06/03/06 13:20:48
To: WFGB Team
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
If SMFilter adds its own headers, couldn't you just write a custom rule for
SA that gives any message with those headers a nega
t: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
Wow Thanks Sandy,
I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their forum
but they believe this is SA issue.
That makes a lot of sense. Yes, I am familiar with writing batch files. I
am not a god at writing them but I can rea
org
Subject: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
> We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail.
Well, not really. I'd say part and parcel of any SA-MTA integration is
finding a way to whitelist messages _before SA is launched_, thus (a)
saving you SA's CPU a
> We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail.
Well, not really. I'd say part and parcel of any SA-MTA integration is
finding a way to whitelist messages _before SA is launched_, thus (a)
saving you SA's CPU and disk time (esp. since you're using
process-based spamassassin a
LMAO ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Now that's funny!
Hey, no monkeying around... here.
(|(ô)Y(ô)|) <~~~ You like my self portrait?
o
(-)
v
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Jo
Date: 06/03/06 03:01:36
To: spectacularstuff
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
spectacularstuff wrote:
> We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail. We would like
> to hire some
elist Froms and Trusted Networks.
I still cannot get rid of SA reporting that we do not have that and
tacking on 2.6 points onto our emails because of it.
View this message in context: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
told
you. No, we do not need onsite service for this. You can do it
remotely.
No, you are not approved for that.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t17
26230.html#a4690812
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
On 6/3/2006 2:39 AM, spectacularstuff wrote:
Hi again Daryl,
I just need to know what you are asking to fix it. You know more than anyone
what is going on with it. I can bring your bid back to corporate on Monday.
Thanks for the reply. I was wondering if I was going to hear from you. :)
I'd
://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.html#a4691040
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
ttp://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.html#a4691004
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
On 6/2/2006 11:44 PM, spectacularstuff wrote:
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail. We would like to
hire someone that is familiar with SpamAssassin and a Windows 2003
server system in order to come set this thing up so that our own emails
are not being detected as SPAM. Is any
, 2006 1:43 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
>
>
>
> If you are going to make remarks, please state all of the facts,
>
> 1. We do not require onsite service.
> 2. Guarantees are accepted.
> 3. Trying to j
that back to corporate, they will tell me the same thing I told
you. No, we do not need onsite service for this. You can do it remotely.
No, you are not approved for that.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.html#a4690812
--
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.html
#a4690717
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
ow them to come
through. That can be cumbersome however.
I would much rather fine someone to hire at a reasonable cost to come in and
fix the errors that are making SA detect our own emails as SPAM.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troub
ng on 2.6 points onto our emails because of it.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.html#a4690327
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
be there and some of the
things that you mentioned. Daryl has also mentioned some other things to me
as well, once again, greek but I am sure they will be helpful in completing
the setup.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726
You have a bunch of problems; You have no PTR record for your MXs
except to the dead end of worldfamousgiftbaskets.net - That domain has bogus
Whois/registration data (i.e. "Not Given" is invalid). Also that domain has
no 'A' or 'MX' records. Your NS records in the TLD zone files don't m
usted Networks. I still cannot get rid of SA reporting that we do not have that and tacking on 2.6 points onto our emails because of it.
View this message in context: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
49 matches
Mail list logo
