orpora.
>
> As usual, we will be able to help you better, if we know what you're
> trying to accomplish.
>
>
> --
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 03:54 -0800, cnone wrote:
> I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them. Most
> of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By the
Yes, there is. Mind having a look at your configuration? The default
local.cf ships with a gla
On 09.02.09 03:54, cnone wrote:
> I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them.
If they are not really spams, there is something broken in your
configuration apparently
> Most of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By
> the way if the score i
lar to early recipients.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Silvester Stallone: Father of t
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
> > Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
> > be accurate?
On 09.02.09 03:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
> hundred percent accurately iden
--
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Calling-spamc-and-looping-through-files-tp21905369p21906389.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
> Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
> be accurate?
By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
hundred percent accurately identify spam. Whenever any program is
involved, there's alw
,s=0; for (i=0;i c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Calling-spamc-and-looping-through-files-tp21905369p21905829.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I would use "formail -s" to go through the mbox file, and pipe the
mail through procmail w/ an appropriate recipe file to filter the mails as
you'd want.
SpamAssassin is happy to markup your mails, but has no filtering capabilities
since it doesn't deliver mail.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:37:30PM
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote:
> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email files)
> under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the spams
> in a different dir?
$ man spamc
$ for f in *; do spamc -c < $f || mv $f spam/; done
Bewar
How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email files)
under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the spams
in a different dir?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Calling-spamc-and-looping-through-files-tp21905369p21905369.html
Sent
11 matches
Mail list logo
