On Friday 13 January 2006 01:25, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Going to 3.0.5 should be pretty painless. Going to 3.1 will be a bit more
> of a bother.
>
Trust me going to 3.1.0 should so cool. :-)
> Loren
--
---
Ronnie Tash
Everything can be achieved as long you can do what it t
ssassin" and "spamd" files floating
around in various /usr/bin directories. (I'd look in /usr/local/bin,
for example.)
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Kettler'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Are there any "starter" ham/spam emails I can use? I thought I saw one, but
> it wasn't for a MySQL database. Im using Bayes, site wide, in mysql. I hate
> to feed it emails I think is ham or spam.
Personally I violently detest "starter" bayes databases, and feel that in t
obert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Ok fixed the symbolic link error, I updated the spamd script with the
> 3.0.5 one, but backed up the old one. Restored the old one and no
> errors. It still shows 3.0.5 in the l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Please don't top-post, it ruins the formatting and flow of the thread!)
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Are there any "starter" ham/spam emails I can use? I thought I saw one, but
> it wasn't for a MySQL database. Im using Bayes, site wide, in mysql. I hate
y, January 12, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Ok fixed the symbolic link error, I updated the spamd script with the
> 3.0.5 one, but backed up the old one. Restored the old one and no
> err
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Ok fixed the symbolic link error, I updated the spamd script with the 3.0.5
> one, but backed up the old one. Restored the old one and no errors. It still
> shows 3.0.5 in the logs but not in the email headers. Any idea where to look
> to see what Im pumping into spamc? I a
Going to 3.0.5 should be pretty painless. Going to 3.1 will be a bit more
of a bother.
Loren
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Jan 12 15:01:35 milkyway spamd[17235]: Can't write to PID file: Too many
> levels of symbolic links
>
> I look in the directory for the pid file and its highlighted red, so now the
> link is not working? And it still shows as 3.0.1 in the header of emails.
Did you mean t
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Bartlett wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the help. It seems to be painless, but in the headers it still
shows 3.0.1, but when I startup SA in debug mode it says 3.0.5. I vagually
remember a file I had to edit to show the proper version in the email
heade
day, January 12, 2006 3:20 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Bartlett wrote:
>> Since finding out the trusted_network i
-scanner on
Fedora core 2.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:04 PM
To: 'Matt Kettler'
Cc: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: RE: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
Looks like it was erroring out tryi
From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Bartlett wrote:
Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my
local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for bayes
turned off. My question is does SA bene
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> I start SA by using service spamassassin start which is a file that pipes
> stuff to spamc.
Erm.. No.
service spamassassin starts up spamd. Nothing else. Period.
I assume you separately pump things into spamc? Where?
w the
link is not working? And it still shows as 3.0.1 in the header of emails.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:42 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
R
I start SA by using service spamassassin start which is a file that pipes
stuff to spamc.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:42 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the help. It seems to be painless, but in the headers it still
> shows 3.0.1, but when I startup SA in debug mode it says 3.0.5. I vagually
> remember a file I had to edit to show the proper version in the email
> headers?
No, there shouldn't be. SA ad
, still
shows 3.0.1. Or does it really matter? I just want to make sure 3.0.5 is
running.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:16 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Need to upgrade heh? I installed it from source and am very weary of doing
> any updates as it's a "production" server. But I guess I don't have a
> chance. Any documents out there you suggest reading on steps to upgrade it?
>
Being a production box, I'd suggest doing an
ttler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my
> local.cf setup. Right now
Heute (12.01.2006/20:51 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Heute (12.01.2006/20:24 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
>>
>>
>Bayes autolearning can be very useful, but I'd suggest adjusting the ham
>learning threshold. The default of 0.5
>>
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (12.01.2006/20:24 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
>
>
Bayes autolearning can be very useful, but I'd suggest adjusting the ham
learning threshold. The default of 0.5
>
>
> I see as default 0.1
Yeah, my bad. I thought it was 0.5, but it's not that
Heute (12.01.2006/20:24 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
>>>Bayes autolearning can be very useful, but I'd suggest adjusting the ham
>>>learning threshold. The default of 0.5
I see as default 0.1
>>
>> how can I change the defaults of learning threshold? I use SA V
>> 3.1.0
> See
Craig McLean wrote:
> Jim Knuth wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>>how can I change the defaults of learning threshold? I use SA V
>>>3.1.0
>
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning_options
>
> Specifically, bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam and
> bayes_au
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (12.01.2006/20:04 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
>
>
>
>>The AWL can be poisoned by a slightly clever spammer, but at best this gets
>>them
>>a "half off your score" for the real spam. For this reason, I keep it
>>disabled.
>
>
>>Bayes autolearning ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Knuth wrote:
[snip]
>
> how can I change the defaults of learning threshold? I use SA V
> 3.1.0
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning_options
Specifically, bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam and
Heute (12.01.2006/20:04 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> The AWL can be poisoned by a slightly clever spammer, but at best this gets
> them
> a "half off your score" for the real spam. For this reason, I keep it
> disabled.
> Bayes autolearning can be very useful, but I'd sugge
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my
> local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for bayes
> turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 back on? Of
> course I would clear out AWL and bayes and sta
> local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for
bayes
> turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 back on?
Of
You are in opinion territory.
Some people like AWL and some don't much care for it. I personally have it
turned off, and don't feel any lack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my
> local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for bayes
> turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 back on? Of
>
Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my
local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for bayes
turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 back on? Of
course I would clear out AWL and bayes and start from scratch if I did. But
w
31 matches
Mail list logo
