Are there any "starter" ham/spam emails I can use? I thought I saw one, but it wasn't for a MySQL database. Im using Bayes, site wide, in mysql. I hate to feed it emails I think is ham or spam.
Robert -----Original Message----- From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:20 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robert Bartlett wrote: >> Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my >> local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for >> bayes turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 >> back on? Of course I would clear out AWL and bayes and start from >> scratch if I did. But would it make it easier for bayes to be >> "poisoned" if I turned auto learn on? Im on SA 3.0.1. ... > Bayes: Round here, BAYES_99 hit 92.77% of spam and 0.40% of ham in the > last year, BAYES_00 hit 80.31% of ham and 0.41% of spam in the same > period. I'd say a well trained bayed db is *very* worthwhile. > As for "bayes poison", I don't think it exists in the sense it's being > used here. Almost every spam I've got with long, random paragraphs in > it There is no inherent Bayes poison that can be placed in spam to poison the database. However, sufficiently large numbers of mistrained messages amount to leaving the Bayes database in a poisoned state that leaves it basically ineffective. In that case it's better to toss the bad Bayes training out and retrain from the start. {^_^}