Are there any "starter" ham/spam emails I can use? I thought I saw one, but
it wasn't for a MySQL database. Im using Bayes, site wide, in mysql. I hate
to feed it emails I think is ham or spam.

Robert 

-----Original Message-----
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:20 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL and Auto Learn Bayes

From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Robert Bartlett wrote:
>> Since finding out the trusted_network issue I question the rest of my 
>> local.cf setup. Right now I have AWL turned off and auto learning for 
>> bayes turned off. My question is does SA benefit from turning those 2 
>> back on? Of course I would clear out AWL and bayes and start from 
>> scratch if I did. But would it make it easier for bayes to be 
>> "poisoned" if I turned auto learn on? Im on SA 3.0.1.
...
> Bayes: Round here, BAYES_99 hit 92.77% of spam and 0.40% of ham in the 
> last year, BAYES_00 hit 80.31% of ham and 0.41% of spam in the same 
> period. I'd say a well trained bayed db is *very* worthwhile.
> As for "bayes poison", I don't think it exists in the sense it's being 
> used here. Almost every spam I've got with long, random paragraphs in 
> it

There is no inherent Bayes poison that can be placed in spam to poison the
database. However, sufficiently large numbers of mistrained messages amount
to leaving the Bayes database in a poisoned state that leaves it basically
ineffective. In that case it's better to toss the bad Bayes training out and
retrain from the start.

{^_^}


Reply via email to