-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/2009 04:32 PM, RobertH wrote:
> hello
>
> i have problems with the cabletv.org email list.
>
> it is hosted on a charter static and has wierd reverse dns etc etc blah.
>
> so, almost always scores as spam
>
> here is what it is trippin
We're running Spamassasin on three machines, two Fedora 8 and one the
latest CENTOS. We're trying to move all of the SA installations to
CENTOS. These are MX servers that front an Exchange server.
The systems are all set up using the same .cf and init.d files, but
we're seeing a difference. We ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2008 04:14 PM, Sam Ami wrote:
> hi all
>
> our current setup.
> primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
> all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
> for delivery to users mailbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2008 01:29 PM, Raymond Jette wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am trying to use sa-learn with a Microsoft Exchange server. The users
> move spam / ham message from there Inbox to a Public folder. The public
> folder is accessable via IMAP.
>
>
I've found Botnet 0.6 and references to Botnet 0.8(ebuild). What's the
preferred version for this plugin?
Marc Perkel wrote:
Need a little help for MySQL users.
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes SA
t I'm forgetting?.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Steven Stern wrote:
|> Crespillo, Matias wrote:
|>> I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
|>> guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
|>> server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way i
r the moment, I'm trying to find a simple solution, such as locating
a tool
| that is capable of managing whatever database SA uses by default for
the AWL.
|>From looking at the scripts, it appears to be something built in to Perl.
|
| On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:49:01 -0500, Steven Stern wrote
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2008 06:32 PM, listmail wrote:
| I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the
| check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems
to have
| removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/2008 03:57 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
|> I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
|>
|> $sa-update
|> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
|> /usr/lib64/perl
I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
$sa-update
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Scalar/Util.pm line 30.
OK... maybe we need an update:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 30 -H"
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28 10:57:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 30 -H"
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28 10:57:
Michael Parker wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2008 07:35 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
|> We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
|> 2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
|> expire.
|>
|
We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
expire.
After the clocks was correctly set, I deleted all tokens that had a
lastupdate in the future, and also removed similar bayes_seen rows. I
then r
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:28:06PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
bayes db version 0 " indicates your bayes file is corrupt. It should be
"version 3". Do you have a backup? SQL or .db?
It doesn't necessarily mean there's corruption,
in fact, sin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again SA experts,
Note the error message in the 2nd-last line of the following transcript:
animalhead:~/sj $ sa-learn --no-rebuild --spam --mbox savejunk
The --no-rebuild option has been deprecated. Please use --no-sync instead.
Learned tokens from 3025 message(s) (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2008 07:24 AM, Umar Murtaza wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who exactly is blocking this email?
| Can i have a settings to keep a copy/archive of this email, if it is
| blocked?
|
|
| Logs:
| Jan 15 18:18:43 mailserver sendmail[20774]: m0FDIbQ2020774:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:49 PM Steven Stern wrote:
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAM's from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
I've posted a howto at
http://sstern.ccim.com/2006/07/1
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAM’s from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
My incoming is scanned by a SA gateway but outgoing goes straight from
exchange to the cloud.
Best Regards,
Jason Holbrook
Chief Technology Integrator / Partner
Em
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Anyone seen these? text/plain and HTML parts, seem to have same
content, saying there's a virus, please delete, and some gibberish.
I'm guessing it's some kind of probe.
There was a web address hidden by a malformed CSS tag.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2007 03:27 PM, Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:03, Paweł Sasin wrote:
>> are you using network tests?
>> Try to evaluate spamd performance when run with the -L flag.
>
> We are running network tests. Disabling them helps somew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2007 09:35 AM, robgeo730 wrote:
> Hello I'm a new user, I have used the search function but wasn't able to find
> a situation like mine.
>
> I am fighting an uphill battle against a crappy hosting company that I can't
> change from. We have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2007 11:06 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:58:26AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>> We get many, many emails from a "Robert Sexton" who claims he'll do
>> wonders with search engine p
We get many, many emails from a "Robert Sexton" who claims he'll do
wonders with search engine placement. As fast as I add an address to
the blacklist, he comes in with another. For example, from the AWL
tables on one of our MX servers:
+--+-+-
mfahey wrote:
SpamAssassin-3.2.0
Freebsd6.2
The file bayes_seen has grown in size to 256GB! (274992939008)
How do I cap the size limit of this file? I want to have it not grow larger
then say 800mb at the most!
Thanks.
You can 'rm' the file or use MySQL for your backend and write a
mainte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2007 10:43 AM, Matt wrote:
>> I'm on Comcast and am having no problems. I set the smarthost for
>> sendmail to "smtp.comcast.net" and, at least so far, have not triggered
>> anything that would block incoming or outgoing mail. All mail from
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - it's interesting that of all of you who responded this is the
only person who is doing it right. I have to say that I'm somewhat
surprised that so few people are preprocessing their email to reduce
the SA load. As we all know SA is very processor and memory expensive.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2007 10:11 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie.
> using blacklist and whitelist before SA)
>
>
We do, except for virus processing through clamav.
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
Igor Chudov wrote:
> I am considering a local deal related to hosting by Comcast cable
> (8mbps down, 1 mbps up).
>
> I am concerned, however, with me sending email and being on comcast IP
> range, due to bad rap that Comcast has due to spamming by Comcast
> hosted zombies.
>
> Do you think that m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Further, I as the sender have no obligation to participate in your
> anti-spam mechanism. It's YOUR mechanism. You feed it, you configure
> it, your CPU cycles are spent on it. I have no obligation to
> participate in the prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Skip Brott wrote:
> Using the recommended actions from this list, I run this:
>
> sa-update --channelfile
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/saupdate/sare-sa-update-channels.txt -D
>
> I get this result from each channel:
>
> [29610] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wael Shahin wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:18 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Stéphane LEPREVOST schrieb:
Hi,
Got one yesterday too here. Seems to be a new way for spammers ...
>> I have two servers one is running DCC and one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V wrote:
>> I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
>> earlier
>> today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>> spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
>> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
diptanjan wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
> checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
>
> # sa-compile
> [4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
> [4846]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
night duke wrote:
I have debian...
*/Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* escribió:
night duke wrote:
> Currently i have this version of spamassassin
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
>
> Can i update it to the last version?
>
night duke wrote:
Currently i have this version of spamassassin
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
Can i update it to the last version?
Apt-get or yum or howto?
Thanks
I prefer to download the .tgz file from spamassassin.apache.org and
create the rpm myself via
rpmbuild -tb file-just-dow
I've set up sa-compile successfully on two of our three servers. The
third gives this error:
Insecure dependency in mkdir while running with -T switch at
/usr/bin/sa-compile line 321, <$fh> line 1.
Googling around, there are references to editing a perl .pm file, but
this error points to the
Abba Communications - www.abbacomm.net wrote:
Greetings,
We have looked over the 3.2.0 install and upgrade docs as best we can so
far...
Situation:
running a Redhat 4.x or Centos 4.x server
SA 3.1.8
Everything is currently run site-wide and not user configurable
No MySQL in use.
Question(s)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to flag a type of spam that seems to be slipping through with
a very low score
The common factor is that all of the messages have something linke
Just type www [.] pillking [.] org
Just type www [.]
pillking [.] org
Just type w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Looking at the bayes_vars table and seeing 2 entries, spamd, and root.
> I'd like to get rid of and per user info so that all learing is common.
> Not sure why this is happening. What do I need to do to force everything
> to one us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
> Steve, I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting
> with get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and
> the last one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the
> ham.spam emails. Kind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
> Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on
> exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a
> folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters?
> Kindly regards, Yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having problems whitelisting mail sent through web sites with a from
address supplied by the user.
Case in point, I send an article from huffingtonpost.com to myself. I
used a "whitelist from huffingtonpost.com", but that doesn't reduce the
spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
> Thanks, but does this mean I have to keep/maintain a list of all the mail
> farms. Keeping this list up to date sounds horrid/impossible.
>
> Matthew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- From this morning's log from three of our MX servers running SA 3.1.7.
Does the channel for 3.1.7 have the wrong rules?
config: configuration file
"/tmp/.spamassassin8654JTlidztmp/20_advance_fee.cf" requires version
3.002000 of SpamAssassin, but thi
laradji nacer wrote:
Steven Stern a écrit :
I've been getting lots of these "get out of debt" messages. It looks
like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server. Could they
have an open relay?
No but gmail host personal domain not only @gmail.com .
Google Apps
David B Funk wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> John D. Hardin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been getting lots of these "get out of debt" messages. It
>>>> looks like the las
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been getting lots of these "get out of debt" messages. It
looks like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server.
Could they have an open relay?
Have you notified <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
I've been getting lots of these "get out of debt" messages. It looks
like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server. Could they
have an open relay?
Received: from ccim-mx2.cciminstitute.com ([10.0.2.10]) by
ccim-exchange.cciminstitute.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Andrea Bencini wrote:
I am looking for local.cf documentation to understand which are the
variables to set in this file.
Can you help me?
Thank
Andrea
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
when I run sa-update it puts new copies of the tests in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org which I
understand from the docs is the correct location. However, the default
tests remain in /usr/share/spamassassin/ and I believe they are still
being used.
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
> now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
> rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare
> rules?
>
> thx
>
> -bazooka
>
> ps I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.4
>
> pps b
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> I try to upgrade my SA in mandrake 10.1.
> I've downloaded the latest SA and build the rpm. But, when I tried to upgrade
> it, it errored:
> rpm -Uvh spamassassin-3.1.7-1.i586.rpm perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.7-1.i586.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> spam
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have successfully (I hope) installed and run sa-update, and
> I see that it installed files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/
>
> In my FreeBSD box, I am used to the rules being in
> /usr/local/share/spamassassin and /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassi
Ron Freidel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We run a relatively small (amount of clients) freebsd email hosting
> server, was running spamassassin: 3.0.2 on a qmail server. We took on a
> new client who was recieving alot of spam, as their old provider kept
> telling them there was nothing that could be done
thekillerbean wrote:
> We currently have an Exchange 2003 server that is under heavy burden due to
> excessive SPAM. The company is not willing to spend $$$ to resolve the
> issue if it can be done on Linux - especially being that we have several
> Linux boxes lying idle! Hence, my plan is to imp
The following appears periodically in my maillog. I think it has to do
with an attempt to do a cpan upgrade or SpamAssassin that I had to back
out and replace with the Fedora RPM. In any case, is this anything to
worry about?
Sep 10 11:12:30 mooch spamd[26250]: (?:(?<=[\s,]))* matches null strin
Lint keeps throwing out this line:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there something special about ebay?
Christopher Mills wrote:
> Tell me something, is there a pluggin for outlook that would allow me to
> train spamassassin on the web server?
> Eg, messages come in, end up in my Junk Mail folder, can i somehow
> select them, and click a button with this 'addin' and have it find our
> web server and
These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
sa-update.
[6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
[6837] info: rules: meta test SAR
Duane Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> In our standard spam report, we have a line like
>>
>> report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
>>
>> I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local
&
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html#anchor
It appears that SA treats the # as the start of
Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Steven Stern <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* Spamass <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:52 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Image only spam
>
> Jack Gostl wrote:
>
Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Steven Stern"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spamass"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Image only spam
>
>
>> Jack Gostl wrote:
>>> Thanks for
al Message ----- From: "Steven Stern"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 running on Perl version 5.8.2
under AIX 5.3. Starting a few mon
Jack Gostl wrote:
> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 running on Perl version 5.8.2
> under AIX 5.3. Starting a few months ago, I have been absolutely
> inundated with "image only spam". I've gone from catching 99% of the
> spam with almost no false positives to less than 85%. I asked about
Richard E. Bewley, Jr. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 running on Perl version 5.8.0. My
> autolearn is enabled, and I'm getting the below headers, which according
> to spamassassin documentation means that autolearn is enabled, but not
> meeting required criteria to learn.
jdow wrote:
> From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>>> Hi ALL
>>>
>>> I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
>>> box, How do i configure spamassassin and integ
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On 7/3/06, Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi ALL
>
> I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
> box, How do i configure spamassassin and integrate it with Sendmail
>
> Thanks and Regard
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi ALL
>
> I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
> box, How do i configure spamassassin and integrate it with Sendmail
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Kaushal
>
Install spamass-milter to link spamassassin and Sendmail.
--
Steve
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Michael Di Martino wrote:
>
>> How does one feed bayes ham and spam on an smpt gateway(no local
>> deliverey). All sever does is accetp mail for one 2 domains scrub
>> for virus and spam and then forward it to its nastly littly
>> exchange server.
>
>
Raymond Norton wrote:
> I have a Centos 4.x server with an rpm install of spamassasin (
> spamassassin-3.0.6-1.el4). I want to upgrade it to the newest version, so
> I can use sa_update for new rules. I might be missing it, but I don't see
> that Centos has an rpm available that I can upgrade to. I
I've run sa-update and have files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001,
002, and 003.
Am I supposed to move these somewhere?
Should all but the latest directory be deleted?
Is it necessary to run sa-update after installing 3.1.3?
--
Steve
Crespillo, Matias wrote:
> I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
> guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
> server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the mails before,
> filter and then forward them to exchange unchange
Rich Winkel wrote:
> According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
>> How do you deployed spamassassin?
>
> I use a milter ...
>
If you're using spamass-milter, edit /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter and
add excluded addresses with the -i paramater:
EXTRA_FLAGS="-i 192.168.1.0/24,127.0.0.1"
--
Steve
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
>>> hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
>>> to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
>>> How i modify this score?
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Doh, no...can you point me in the direction of how to do that?
>
>
>
> on 5/12/06 8:23 AM, Steven Stern at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Ok, fair enough...i downloaded and ran
>>>
>>> rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, fair enough...i downloaded and ran
>
> rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz
>
> As descibed on the site. I don't see any changes in the version number, is
> there more I have to do ?
>
>
That just creates the RPM files in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS. Did you inst
Chris Edwards wrote:
> Hola,
>
> I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to
> work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on
> the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam
> and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can so
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 16:01 Steven Stern wrote:
I imported a corpus of about 2 messages total and it wasn't
working. I blew it all away and started from scratch thinking that
was the problem. For now, local.cf has a minimum of 100 messages of
each type
Andy Spiegl wrote:
[3320] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 178, nham = 168
Probably because your corpus is still too small.
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
...
bayes_min_ham_num(Default: 200)
bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200)
To be accurate, the Bayes sy
On a new SA installation that's as identical to the other 3 we have
running as possible, bayes is not running.
spamassassin -D --lint indicates that all is normal. The test message
generates a Bayes score. sa-learn is able to talk to the mysql
database: We're able to update the database using sa
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:54:50PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing 3.1.1 by building the RPM from the .tar.gz file, I get
the following in my log:
Hrm. None of these are SpamAssassin related, fwiw.
Mar 11 22:51:52 mooch spamd[15660]: List::Util object
After installing 3.1.1 by building the RPM from the .tar.gz file, I get
the following in my log:
Mar 11 22:51:52 mooch spamd[15660]: List::Util object version 1.14 does
not match bootstrap parameter 1.18 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm line 92.
Mar 11 22:51:52 mooch
Webmaster wrote:
Those of you you have used both native DBM and new SQL bayesian,
can you comment on benefits of one versus the other please.
Much appreciated!
I have three MX servers fronting our Exchange box. The fastest of the
MX servers is also handling the MySQL server for both bayes
M. Lewis wrote:
Thanks Steve,
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 57468 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 16419 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 181931 0 non-to
M. Lewis wrote:
I recently lost a hard drive and have had to setup everything again.
I'm seeing a fair amount of spam that is getting through my filters.
From what I can see in the headers of messages, bayes does not seem to
be used at all. I'm reasonable sure this is the reason I'm seeing sp
Al Bogner wrote:
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with
Original Message
Subject: re: rpm of Spam Assassin
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:23:35 -0600
From: Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steven,
Thanks for the reply re: the rpm build of SpamAssassin 3.1.0. I also
did the build on my system, but I can't find the location of where the
build
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled:
Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is "current"):
perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,"\n"; {' <
current
(I promise it's not a rootkit :-)
Steven Stern wrote:
1. I created two public folders, "should-be-spam" and "should-be-ham"
and I semi-regularly remind users to copy (for ham) or move (for spam)
mis-marked messages. The message that goes with spam includes a link to
a web page explaining how to mo
Karsten Krämer wrote:
Hi,
we use postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin on a linux box as relay,
exchange on server 2003 as final destination.
Which way is the best to get (ham and/or spam) mail out of user
mailboxes from exchange to linux for further "sa-learning".
Maybe there exist some Howto
I just installed an update for Perl for Fedora 4 and now...
Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object version 1.14 does
not match bootstrap parameter 1.18 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm line 92.
Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object versio
Matt Kettler wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my
wife.)
I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work
for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email,
I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my
wife.)
I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work
for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email,
then the all_spam_to negative score gets applied to the message and
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Steven,
Thursday, December 1, 2005, 6:57:45 PM, you wrote:
SS> In order to keep our mail flowing to AOL members, I've signed up through
SS> the AOL postmaster service to receive TOS reports. Basically, whenever
SS> someone reports mail from our domains as spam, AOL
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
you should _definitely_ whitelist AOL's scomp source address -- preferably
using "whitelist_from_spf", as they publish a reliable SPF record
for aol.net.
- --j.
Thanks. That did the trick:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.8 req
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
