-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Rudd wrote:
> > Further, I as the sender have no obligation to participate in your > anti-spam mechanism. It's YOUR mechanism. You feed it, you configure > it, your CPU cycles are spent on it. I have no obligation to > participate in the program you use for deciding "is this spam or not". I > have no obligation to devote my time and my CPU cycles to your anti-spam > program. It's rather rude for you to assume otherwise. > My company's website has a "click here and we'll send you your password" (or something similar). You'd be amazed how many calls we get claiming it doesn't work. When I track through the logs, I find most come from people with CR systems. You can't use a CR when you're talking to a robot. These things make me sooooooo mad. - -- Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGoURoeERILVgMyvARAgeSAJ9Cwu/vRWEgskKwXF5QAg4QbpDB+QCfRNU0 Ya/NuKWXYspVpCIzNvN8zxs= =oLbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
