mistake and have) but half of me thinks both of these were on purpose
for the purpose of the lint fail thread... So, way to go Benny! đ
Enjoy your day.
I love SA!!! Thank You everyone for your posts, help, and contributions to the
community!
Long time lurker... sometimes poster,
Steven
Long time lurker⊠sometimes poster:
The marketplace of ideas is a century old concept that goes back to the days of
landmark U.S.S.C. First Amendment cases, and it is the âmarketplaceââs duty to
weed out bad ideas (such like SpamAssassin is doing).
But again, SpamAssassin isnât infringing on a
Hi everybody,
is the Pyzor network down again?
We receiving the following error when we execute 'pyzor ping'
public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.')
Is there anybody which can confirm this too?
client).
Let me know if you are interested in hearing more offline.
P.S. I am mostly a lurker to this forum... until someone brings up the
word Exchange. :)
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Axb [mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:17 AM
To: users
I have SA running and configured to call clamav.cf My mail server checks the
incoming messages by running SA as a milter, so the spam is rejected before
reception completes. My mail logfile for a specific message might look like this:
Oct 5 11:30:01 saturn sendmail[20656]: q95FTj2G020656: Milt
Back at Xmas, I went from Fedora 10 to Fedora 15. Since then I never noticed
that my MySQL AWL table has no entries. Here's what I have:
* spamassassin-3.3.2-7.fc15.x86_64
* In mysql
CREATE TABLE `awl` (
`username` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`email` varchar(200) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
On 03/30/10 09:23, quoth Martin Svensson:
> Again, thanks for your contributions all.
>
> Martin: We are running SA on separate servers, our MySQL is running on a
> dedicated server. The servers running Amavis/SA are running smoothly, no
> swap and no insanse I/O operations.
>
> Jari: The engine
On 10/03/09 20:16, quoth Benny Pedersen:
> On lĂžr 03 okt 2009 23:41:41 CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote
>> Thank you. I am still confused in one area:
>
> no problem
>
>> These scripts do not touch the bayes_token table, and it is this table
>> that
>>
On 10/02/09 04:22, quoth Benny Pedersen:
> On fre 02 okt 2009 04:47:56 CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote
>> I have all my SA tables up and running using InnoDB and using the
>> above table definitions. I just have one question:
>>
>> Will the cronjob that was d
On 10/02/09 02:43, quoth Warren Togami:
> # 2005/07/29, http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html header RCVD_VIA_APNIC
> Received =~
> /[^0-9.](?:5[89]|6[01]|12[456]|20[23]|21[0189]|22[012])(?:\.[012]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}(?:\]|\)|
> )/ describe RCVD_VIA_APNIC Received through a relay in Asia/Pacific
> Net
On 10/02/09 13:52, quoth Michael Scheidell:
> not to be outdone by hackers and thieves, phishing for PPI, southwest
> airlines is sending out their own DKIM signed, SPF PASSED, from their own
> servers, their very own phishing email. (didn't one of the major banks do
> something like this 3 years
On 09/24/09 09:21, quoth Benny Pedersen:
> On tor 24 sep 2009 04:57:57 CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote
>> Since I haven't *ever* touched this table for cleanup, the above
>> described cron job will not delete any rows for that period of time.
>
> you will have l
I got the timestanp field added to the bayee_seen table.
I don't know why but
ALTER TABLE bayes_seen
ADD lastupdate timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
did not work as it set all of the lastupdate fields to '-00-00 00:00:00'
which apparently is *not*
On 09/23/09 07:14, quoth Jari Fredriksson:
>> On 23.09.09 00:04, Steven W. Orr wrote:
>>> Every so often, I see some large MySQL accesses taking place from SA.
>>> Is there any regular maintenance needed or should I just leave it
>>> alone?
>> It depends
Every so often, I see some large MySQL accesses taking place from SA. Is there
any regular maintenance needed or should I just leave it alone?
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Or
On 09/06/09 08:41, quoth Benny Pedersen:
> On Sun 06 Sep 2009 04:38:12 AM CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote
>
>> Should I worry? Is there anything I should do?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/
>
> 2.006 have being stable nearly a year now, if after upgrad
An error happened on Aug 10:
Aug 10 12:38:52 saturn spamd[771]: spf: lookup failed: Can't lo
cate object method "new_from_string" via package "Mail::SPF::Mech::IP4" at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SPF/Record.pm line 22.
After that nothing and now on Sep 5, I have 48 new occurrences.
ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/09 20:01, quoth RW:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:07:12 -0400
> "Michael W. Cocke" wrote:
>
>> There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
>> this list. The email address
>> "users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/09 12:00, quoth Michael Scheidell:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> SA + spamass-milter + sendmail
>>
>> I have spamass-milter set to reject during reception if the score is too
>> high.
>> What I'd like to have happe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SA + spamass-milter + sendmail
I have spamass-milter set to reject during reception if the score is too high.
What I'd like to have happen is for the rejected mail to be automatically
reported to spamcop.
I thought I knew what I was doing by setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/09 03:05, quoth Mark Martinec:
> Steven,
>
>> Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument "2.long" isn't \
>> numeric in numeric lt (<) at \
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument "2.long" isn't \
numeric in numeric lt (<) at \
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 1004.
Should I be concerned?
595 > spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/09 13:56, quoth Steven W. Orr:
> I think I have a problem. Maybe not, but I'd like to hear what other people
> think.
>
> I have a small home server running sendmail, spamassassin, spamass-milter and
> clamav-milter. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think I have a problem. Maybe not, but I'd like to hear what other people
think.
I have a small home server running sendmail, spamassassin, spamass-milter and
clamav-milter. The clamav helped a lot but there was a bunch of stuff getting
through des
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/09 16:15, quoth René Berber:
> Steven W. Orr wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't seem to support. i.e.,
>> I
>> and lots of other people want the ability to pipe a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried asking this question on the TB forum, but they're tied up with their
own problems right now. I'd like to try here because I frequently get my
problems solved.
Here is what I posted on the TB help forum.
Spamasassin and retraining a false nega
On Thursday, Jun 4th 2009 at 19:47 -, quoth RW:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
"Steven W. Orr" wrote:
My dns MX record looks like this:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
syslang.net.9738IN MX 100 mx2.zoneedit.com.
syslang.net.9738IN
In my /etc/mail/spamassassin, I have two files, wrongmx.cf and wrongmx.pm
The cf file looks like this:
loadplugin WrongMX wrongmx.pm
header WRONGMX eval:wrongmx()
describeWRONGMX Sent to lower pref MX when higher pref MX was up.
tflags WRONGMX net
score
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/2009 04:32 PM, RobertH wrote:
> hello
>
> i have problems with the cabletv.org email list.
>
> it is hosted on a charter static and has wierd reverse dns etc etc blah.
>
> so, almost always scores as spam
>
> here is what it is trippin
We're running Spamassasin on three machines, two Fedora 8 and one the
latest CENTOS. We're trying to move all of the SA installations to
CENTOS. These are MX servers that front an Exchange server.
The systems are all set up using the same .cf and init.d files, but
we're seeing a difference. We ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2008 04:14 PM, Sam Ami wrote:
> hi all
>
> our current setup.
> primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
> all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
> for delivery to users mailbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2008 01:29 PM, Raymond Jette wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am trying to use sa-learn with a Microsoft Exchange server. The users
> move spam / ham message from there Inbox to a Public folder. The public
> folder is accessable via IMAP.
>
>
I've found Botnet 0.6 and references to Botnet 0.8(ebuild). What's the
preferred version for this plugin?
On Monday, Jul 28th 2008 at 12:03 -, quoth Mark Martinec:
=>Dan,
=>
=>> I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear
=>> to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be
=>> loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs:
=>>
=>> Jul 23 13:
In my /etc/mail/spamassassin, I have the latest copy of wrongmx.pm and
wrongmx.cf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# cat wrongmx.cf
loadplugin WrongMX wrongmx.pm
header WRONGMX eval:wrongmx()
describeWRONGMX Sent to lower pref MX when higher pref MX was up.
tflags W
On Tuesday, Jul 15th 2008 at 11:14 -, quoth Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
=>On 15.07.08 11:05, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> I took a look at TextCat and decided to try and give it a whirl.
=>>
=>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
=>> [13019] warn:
I took a look at TextCat and decided to try and give it a whirl.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
[13019] warn: String found where operator expected at (eval 612) line 1, near ""loadplugin"
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat""
[13019] warn: (Missing operator before "Mail::
=>doesn't use it internally.
=>
=>Hmm, any chance you neglected to restart spamd after editing the configs?
=>
=>Do you get the same lack of modifications piping messages through spamc on the
=>command line?
=>
On Thursday, Jul 10th 2008 at 23:48 -, quoth David B Funk:
7th 2008 at 05:41 -, quoth Justin Mason:
=>
=>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
=>> On 06.07.08 23:09, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> > Should I expect to see X-Relay-Countries as an added header in my
=>> > unrejected mail or is that only added to rejected mail? (Right no
On Tuesday, Jul 8th 2008 at 10:18 -, quoth McDonald, Dan:
=>On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:00 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> On Monday, Jul 7th 2008 at 05:41 -, quoth Justin Mason:
=>>
=>> =>
=>> =>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
=>> =>> On 06.07.08
On Monday, Jul 7th 2008 at 05:41 -, quoth Justin Mason:
=>
=>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
=>> On 06.07.08 23:09, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> > Should I expect to see X-Relay-Countries as an added header in my
=>> > unrejected mail or is that only added to
I uncommented
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
in init.pre
and I created a relay_country.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin
The setup I use is sendmail/spamassmilter/spamsassin(spamd) to reject mail
during reception.
Should I expect to see X-Relay-Countries as an added header i
God dag,
***
Warning!
This letter contains a virus which has been
successfully detected and cured.
***
The part that's noteworthy is this:
***
Warning!
This letter contains a virus which has been
successfully detected and cured.
***
Does someone have rule for this ready made?
Thanks
--
Marc Perkel wrote:
Need a little help for MySQL users.
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes SA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2008 07:33 AM, ejml wrote:
| Hello Steven,
|
| I'm very interesting about how I can forward the message with the header
| rewritten to final user because I get only a warning spam arrival message.
| Is there some parameters tha
r the moment, I'm trying to find a simple solution, such as locating
a tool
| that is capable of managing whatever database SA uses by default for
the AWL.
|>From looking at the scripts, it appears to be something built in to Perl.
|
| On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:49:01 -0500, Steven Stern wrote
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2008 06:32 PM, listmail wrote:
| I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the
| check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems
to have
| removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/2008 03:57 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
|> I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
|>
|> $sa-update
|> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
|> /usr/lib64/perl
I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
$sa-update
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Scalar/Util.pm line 30.
OK... maybe we need an update:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 30 -H"
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28 10:57:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 30 -H"
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28 10:57:
All of sudden, my ability to report email to spamcop has been impacted.
I'm not doing anything differently.
I read my mail using alpine and I pipe my spam through the following
script:
exec tee >(mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]) | sa-learn --spam
As of this morning I get the reports sent back to me s
100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so I added this to
my local.cf file:
ok_languages en
However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all. I'm still
getting tons of Russian and asian spams that don't seem to even be
triggering any SA rules at all. Am I using the config o
Michael Parker wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2008 07:35 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
|> We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
|> 2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
|> expire.
|>
|
We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
expire.
After the clocks was correctly set, I deleted all tokens that had a
lastupdate in the future, and also removed similar bayes_seen rows. I
then r
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:28:06PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
bayes db version 0 " indicates your bayes file is corrupt. It should be
"version 3". Do you have a backup? SQL or .db?
It doesn't necessarily mean there's corruption,
in fact, sin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again SA experts,
Note the error message in the 2nd-last line of the following transcript:
animalhead:~/sj $ sa-learn --no-rebuild --spam --mbox savejunk
The --no-rebuild option has been deprecated. Please use --no-sync instead.
Learned tokens from 3025 message(s) (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2008 07:24 AM, Umar Murtaza wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who exactly is blocking this email?
| Can i have a settings to keep a copy/archive of this email, if it is
| blocked?
|
|
| Logs:
| Jan 15 18:18:43 mailserver sendmail[20774]: m0FDIbQ2020774:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:49 PM Steven Stern wrote:
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAM's from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
I've posted a howto at
http://sstern.ccim.com/2006/07/1
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAMâs from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
My incoming is scanned by a SA gateway but outgoing goes straight from
exchange to the cloud.
Best Regards,
Jason Holbrook
Chief Technology Integrator / Partner
Em
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Anyone seen these? text/plain and HTML parts, seem to have same
content, saying there's a virus, please delete, and some gibberish.
I'm guessing it's some kind of probe.
There was a web address hidden by a malformed CSS tag.
mote-MTA: DNS; [207.111.236.145]
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:00:23 -0800
Will-Retry-Until: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:54:29 -0800
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:06:30
From: Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: spamassassin talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2007 03:27 PM, Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:03, PaweĂ
â Sasin wrote:
>> are you using network tests?
>> Try to evaluate spamd performance when run with the -L flag.
>
> We are running network tests. Disabling them helps somew
Is there someone with a script to modify qmail-scanner-queue.pl or another
script to run /sbin/iptables to block a spam IP address on the first flagged
email, then maybe remove blocks from iptables after a day.
I use fail2ban to block misbehaving hosts - like those that send too
many spam mes
ange since my current employer does not require me to admin Exchange
systems.
P.S. If my research is flawed, and someone knows a solution, please
share it.
HTH,
Steven
From: Donald F. Caruana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2007 09:35 AM, robgeo730 wrote:
> Hello I'm a new user, I have used the search function but wasn't able to find
> a situation like mine.
>
> I am fighting an uphill battle against a crappy hosting company that I can't
> change from. We have
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign
ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers...
What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to
their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to
score p
On Sunday, Oct 21st 2007 at 00:27 -, quoth Igor Chudov:
=>I was looking at this article
=>
=> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam
=>
=>It claims that "only five countries are hosting 99.68% of the global
=>spammer websites", of which the foremost is China, hosting 73.58% of
=>all web sit
My question is - Does spamassassin scan the mail for each recipient? or
does it scan only once? If it is the later I would not expect
spamassassin to fall over each time one of these mailouts is sent.
Is this due to it being in the acl of exim? does anyone have any advice
on how to avoid this?
I
Parsing the SA logs would be easy, but the connecting IP isn't listed
there.
As I mentioned, I'm parsing exim's logs. It contains the spam score and
the IP address.
Or think of it as a way of SA saying "when I get twelve spams of
score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I will feed the auto-expiring RBL,
which *SENDMAIL* works off of, thus keeping my *SPAMASSASSIN* load
lower. Thus a spam deluge via a dictionary attack that may take hours
is mitigated in the c
Jonathan Armitage wrote:
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Thanks for the response Loren, but unfortunately, as far as I know we
can specify the "spamd" directive just once in exim.
I realise we're getting OT here, but there are at least two ways to call
SA from Exim, the built-in hook which you are using
Tom Bombadil wrote:
This is not really on-topic for the SA list, but what clamav support are you
missing?
Sorry... I guess I didn't explain myself properly. I don't want to go
off topic talking about exim, but basically clamav failover/load balance
is the problem. We already do what you s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2007 11:06 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:58:26AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>> We get many, many emails from a "Robert Sexton" who claims he'll do
>> wonders with search engine p
We get many, many emails from a "Robert Sexton" who claims he'll do
wonders with search engine placement. As fast as I add an address to
the blacklist, he comes in with another. For example, from the AWL
tables on one of our MX servers:
+--+-+-
mfahey wrote:
SpamAssassin-3.2.0
Freebsd6.2
The file bayes_seen has grown in size to 256GB! (274992939008)
How do I cap the size limit of this file? I want to have it not grow larger
then say 800mb at the most!
Thanks.
You can 'rm' the file or use MySQL for your backend and write a
mainte
If you have one MX and you create a fake low MX and a fake high MX (or
many fake high MX) about 75% to 95% of your spam goes away. It's that
simple.
How do you deal with the false-positives, legit servers that are blocked
by this configuration?
There aren't any false positives. That
I don't know, but botnet hits a significant amount
of legitimate email here, regardless of how badly configured the sending
servers are.
I set botnet to score two, and I flag as spam at four. Every time I've
had a false positive botnet hit, other rules have been enough to keep
the score bel
I had great results from grey-listing but my users didn't like
having to wait 30-60-90 minutes for mail, and I understand that. When
you're on the phone with someone and they say "Just sent it," they
expect you to have it in a matter of seconds. As I'm often in that
positition, I had to sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2007 10:43 AM, Matt wrote:
>> I'm on Comcast and am having no problems. I set the smarthost for
>> sendmail to "smtp.comcast.net" and, at least so far, have not triggered
>> anything that would block incoming or outgoing mail. All mail from
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - it's interesting that of all of you who responded this is the
only person who is doing it right. I have to say that I'm somewhat
surprised that so few people are preprocessing their email to reduce
the SA load. As we all know SA is very processor and memory expensive.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2007 10:11 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie.
> using blacklist and whitelist before SA)
>
>
We do, except for virus processing through clamav.
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
sing 3.17.
There could be a bug in 3.19 still, but I don't have time to validate
that possibility. Maybe the poster's problem was just an install
issue(that's what I am leaning towards). Anyways, he is happy and
filtering spam!
FYI to all.
Steven
, I currently run
> > SA3.18 with a similar yet different Exchange Sink and have no such
> > problems as the original poster.
>
> > Steven
>
> So which sink do you use? Maybe he should use it instead?
>
> Loren
>
I created it myself.. There's d
Sorry for jumping in late to this thread.. But, I currently run SA3.18
with a similar yet different Exchange Sink and have no such problems as
the original poster.
Steven
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:2
Igor Chudov wrote:
> I am considering a local deal related to hosting by Comcast cable
> (8mbps down, 1 mbps up).
>
> I am concerned, however, with me sending email and being on comcast IP
> range, due to bad rap that Comcast has due to spamming by Comcast
> hosted zombies.
>
> Do you think that m
and isn't
considered to be that much better than C/R (it doesn't clutter a
forged-sender's mail box, but it can bog down a forged-sender's mail
server with verification requests).
Well, it may be. I know, however, that a lot of people is doing this at the
MTA level in order to reject mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Further, I as the sender have no obligation to participate in your
> anti-spam mechanism. It's YOUR mechanism. You feed it, you configure
> it, your CPU cycles are spent on it. I have no obligation to
> participate in the prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Skip Brott wrote:
> Using the recommended actions from this list, I run this:
>
> sa-update --channelfile
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/saupdate/sare-sa-update-channels.txt -D
>
> I get this result from each channel:
>
> [29610] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature
I used to use it but it's old and has bugs. I recent;y found out that it's
*not* part of the sa distro. Is this still supported and if so, where do I
get it?
I looked around and found hugely conflicting version info. e.g., version
0.93 seems to support sa-3.1.x but version 1.03 seems to be for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wael Shahin wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:18 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Stéphane LEPREVOST schrieb:
Hi,
Got one yesterday too here. Seems to be a new way for spammers ...
>> I have two servers one is running DCC and one
On Wednesday, Jun 13th 2007 at 17:14 -0400, quoth Rosenbaum, Larry M.:
=>> From: Steven W. Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=>>
=>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh
=>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
=>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:perl-Mail-SpamAssassin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V wrote:
>> I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
>> earlier
>> today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>> spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
>> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
diptanjan wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
> checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
>
> # sa-compile
> [4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
> [4846]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
night duke wrote:
I have debian...
*/Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* escribiĂł:
night duke wrote:
> Currently i have this version of spamassassin
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
>
> Can i update it to the last version?
>
night duke wrote:
Currently i have this version of spamassassin
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
Can i update it to the last version?
Apt-get or yum or howto?
Thanks
I prefer to download the .tgz file from spamassassin.apache.org and
create the rpm myself via
rpmbuild -tb file-just-dow
I'm running SA with sendmail and spamass-milter with a reject score set to
5. It occurred to me that I never actually saw the daily list of email
addresses of people whose messages were rejected. i.e., I never had an
option to view any possible false positives. It turns out it's not a
simple gr
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
