-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think I have a problem. Maybe not, but I'd like to hear what other people 
think.

I have a small home server running sendmail, spamassassin, spamass-milter and
clamav-milter. The clamav helped a lot but there was a bunch of stuff getting
through despite all that until I added scamp from
https://sourceforge.net/projects/scamp/

Now things are creeping up again and it's making me think that there's a
coordination issue I'm missing. Again: anything that gets through is stuff
that sa liked after having gotten through clamav (plus scamp).

Given that there are two milters, (i.e., spamass-milter and clamav-milter) I
had to pick which should be first. I chose clamav, so if clamav-milter rejects
it then spamassassin never sees the message.

BTW, all false negatives are sent on to sa-learn --spam and then on to spamcop.

Here's the question: Is it desirable for the stuff that gets rejected by
clamav to be pumped through sa-learn? Is there a way to do it? The converse
question is that if I were to switch the order of the milters, then all of the
false negs that sa passes on to clavav that are picked up by clamav would also
not be reported back to sa. What I really need is a better system for
coordinating my sa bayes tables and whitelists. In fact, it seems like what
would make sense is for clamav to be a test that is a plugin added to sa.

Am I making any sense? Is this a good idea? Does it already exist? Are they
coming to take me away?

TIA

- --
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEUEARECAAYFAkpPl9wACgkQRIVy4fC+NyR2eACdFmxtN/1T3+u3OZVFlGuhdsz7
hacAmNRdEVsHnav9XXCiyly2nCfjRG4=
=kVWe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to