On 09/06/09 08:41, quoth Benny Pedersen: > On Sun 06 Sep 2009 04:38:12 AM CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote > >> Should I worry? Is there anything I should do? > > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/ > > 2.006 have being stable nearly a year now, if after upgrade there is > still problem show it here or to the rpm maintainers >
Thanks. I think I'm ok now. Since I'm running Fedora 10 and all the stuff is RPM based, I had to (ok, I wanted to) get the src.rpm for Fedora 11 and build it myself. Before i could do that, I had to add perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.24-73.fc10.i386 perl-Module-Build-0.3200-73.fc10.i386 perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-0.003-3.fc9.noarch before I could even build perl-Mail-SPF-2.006-3.fc10.noarch from perl-Mail-SPF-2.006-3.fc12.src.rpm Now they're all installed and I should be good. -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
