> From: Matt [mailto:lm7...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 11:32 AM
> To: users
> Subject: DKIM Checks
>
> I am running spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 on 64 bit CentOS.
>
> sa-update -D seems to indicate that the DKIM libraries are installed.
> ...
> May 18 10:25:02.683 [15134] dbg: diag:
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
> Subject: Re: Fake MX
>
> > > [...] but that is distinct from being a tarpit, which is what
> > > I'm trying to clarify.
> >
> > A discussion around the definition of tarpit, and why tarbaby might be a
> > suboptimal, though catchy, name?
>
> For the r
Are there domains that have actually defined SPF record type records? I
haven’t been able to find any, but it could be the fault of the tools I’m using.
L
From: Noel Butler [mailto:noel.but...@ausics.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:14 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: e
ing. It is in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf
or some similar directory. To find your config directory path, try this:
spamassassin -D config --lint
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >&
> -Original Message-
> From: njjrdell [mailto:nruggi...@dellmagazines.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:32 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX
>
>
> I'm pretty sure she would not send a GTUBE. Here is another from her
>
> Sep 28 08:35:26 nsmai
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are planning
to move to Red Hat. I don't have much experience with Red Hat (or Linux in
general). Could you point me to some tips and documentation about installing
and running SA on Red Hat?
FYI, on Solaris I install by downl
> What is the best way to completely whitelist all internal emails so that
> there is no danger of any internal emails being blacklisted
The best way is to not feed internal emails to SpamAssassin.
I'm seeing warnings like this when I run sa-compile:
Illegal octal digit '9' ignored at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/BodyRuleBaseExtractor.pm
line 1083, <$fh> line 5645.
Illegal octal digit '9' ignored at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/
> From: d.h...@yournetplus.com [mailto:d.h...@yournetplus.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:29 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: new PDF "Launch" malware exploit (with sample)
>
> Quoting "Rosenbaum, Larry M." :
>
> > Ple
Please don't send live malware samples to the list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip M. [mailto:sa_c...@iowahoneypot.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: new PDF "Launch" malware exploit (with sample)
>
> FILE QUARANTINED
>
> Micr
> Generally speaking, anything deemed worthwhile is added to SA proper
> (unless there's a licensing question). The exceptions come from
> automated rules (like Sought, MBL, SARE 2tld, and Khop-sc-neighbors),
90_2tld.cf has been replaced by the official rule file 20_aux_tlds.cf. From
the commen
> From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:sa-l...@alexb.ch]
>
> On 3/4/2010 7:34 PM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> >> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> >&g
t Another Ninja wrote:
> > On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > >> Is there still a reason for this update channel?
> > >>
> > >> 90_sare_freemail.cf.sar
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
Yesterday one of our servers started having problems. I found the following
messages in the syslog file:
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20926]: spamd: respawning server at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 1080.
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20927]: spamd: respawning server at
/usr/local/bin/spamd
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.011)
SunOS ornl72 5.9 Generic_122300-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240
What causes the following error message when restarting spamd?
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check t
> check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
> line
> 164.
>
>What plugin do I need to have loaded to resolve this error?
It looks like you are missing the v320.pre file, which contains
loadplugin Mai
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:42 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: About upgrading
>
> LuKreme wrote:
> > On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
--Original Message-
> From: Alex [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 9:13 PM
> To: SA Mailing list
> Subject: Re: About upgrading
>
> Hi,
>
> > sa-learn --dump magic gives:
> > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes
> db version
>
I have just recently installed SA v3.3.0-rc1 on Solaris 10. I have discovered
that in order for syslog logging to work, I have to start spamd with the switch
"--syslog-socket=native". It won't work if I set it to "unix" or "inet" or if
I omit the switch entirely. As this is my first time runn
What is the recommended version of re2c to use with SpamAssassin v3.3.0? What
about with v3.2.5?
Thanks, Larry
> From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
>
> > Thanks for testing! Which version of a perl module Time::HiRes
> > do you have installed? See what is reported by:
> > $ perl -MTime::HiRes -le 'print Time::HiRes->VERSION'
1.9719
This is the version that came with Perl 5.10.1, and i
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0-beta1
running on Perl version 5.10.1
Solaris 9 Sparc
I am getting the following errors in "make test":
t/timeout.t ... 5/27 # Failed test 5 in t/timeout.t at line
63
t/timeout.t ... 7/27 # Failed test 7 in t/timeout.t at line
> From: Warren Togami [mailto:wtog...@redhat.com]
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-beta1 available
> ...
> - if module Digest::SHA is not available, a module Digest::SHA1
> will be used, but at least one of them must be installed;
> a DKIM plugin requires Digest::SHA (the ol
Thanks. It was a firewall issue.
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:54 PM
To: Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DCC problems
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Recently I've started seeing message like this in ou
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files:
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC
serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at
64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911
Has anybody considered revising the Bayes expiration logic? Maybe it's just
our data that's weird, but the built-in expiration logic doesn't seem to work
very well for us. Here are my observations:
There's no point in checking anything older than oldest_atime. For this value
and older, zero
> From: Jonas Eckerman [mailto:jonas_li...@frukt.org]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
>
> > It appears that "pdftohtml" is only available as a Windows executable
> (on Sourceforge).
>
> If you want a precompiled executable it seems Windows is the only
>
> And, please tell me of problems.
> pdftohtml is imho not found in gentoo, but pdf2html is maybe the same ?
It appears that "pdftohtml" is only available as a Windows executable (on
Sourceforge). I need something that will run on Solaris.
We can use antiword to render text from MSWord files, and unrtf to render text
from RTF files. What is the best tool to render text from PDF files?
(We are running Solaris 9)
L
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonas Eckerman [mailto:jonas_li...@frukt.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
> > >IMPORTANT: If sorbs does not get picked-up by a new host, will SA
> > >developers be ready to roll-out an SA update to remove the sorbs
> rules, so
> > >that we don't suffer a bunch of timeouts? Or how doe
> From: felic...@kluge.net On Behalf Of Theo Van Dinter
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Jason Haar
> wrote:
> > Speaking of image/rtf/word attachment spam; is there any work going
> on
> > to standardize this so that the textual output of such attachments
> could
> > be fed back into SA?
>
>
We get a significant number of 419 scam letters where the actual spam text is
in a Word (.doc or .rtf) or PDF attachment. Example:
http://pastebin.com/m4a161daa
It would be really great if there was an SA plugin to extract the text from the
attachment and then feed the text to the regular SA b
We are running
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
Solaris 9 Sparc
with the MySQL Bayes store and autolearning. We are using
bayes_expiry_max_db_size 100
Expiry is done manually once a day. Here is a typical output from expiry:
Thu Mar 19 00:12:00 EDT 2009 Forcing B
> From: netz-haut - stephan seitz [mailto:s.se...@netz-haut.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:15 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Hostname in X-Spam-Checker-Version Header
>
> Hi there,
>
> as shown in the manual, the X-Spam-Checker-Version header is not
> configurable for so
What is the significance of this message in the spamd log?
Feb 27 12:56:25 localhost spamd[222]: config: dup unknown type freemail_re,
Regexp
(Somebody asked a similar question in November, but I didn't see an answer.)
Thanks,
Larry
The information on the download page should be corrected to point to the right
file. Or perhaps removed entirely: when you build from source, the build
procedure prompts you for site contact information and puts it into the
10_default_prefs.cf file. It is also put into the sa-update script, so
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:spamassas...@dostech.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 2:48 AM
>
> On 19/12/2008 5:40 AM, Marcin Krol wrote:
> > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >> do it all at once. See my SARE sa-update page for details:
> >
> >> http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-s
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > The Bayes database can be backed up and restored with sa-learn --
> backup/--restore. Is there any similar way to back up and restore a
> MySQL-bas
The Bayes database can be backed up and restored with sa-learn
--backup/--restore. Is there any similar way to back up and restore a
MySQL-based AWL database? The "check_whitelist" command is only good for DBM
files.
> From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was doing a bit of "spamassassin -D" testing with SA 3.2.4 and
> noticed
> that it's running my own mail server name through various DNSBL tests.
>
> Here are the headers of the particular message I am testing:
>
> >From [EMAIL PR
> From: Stefan Jakobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> INFO: SA version: 3.2.5, 3.002005, no optional modules:
> Sys::Hostname::Long
> What is the benefit of using this modul?
Sys::Hostname::Long is required by Mail::SPF::Query. However, Mail::SPF::Query
has been superseded by Mail::SP
Where is the price list? I haven't been able to find it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Brennan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:25 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SURBL Usage Policy change
>
>
> Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:42:53PM -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > And here is the information from the local.cf file:
> >
> > bayes_expiry_max_db_size 50
> >
> > So the config file says 500 th
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5, running on Perl version 5.8.8, Solaris 9
Using MySQL for Bayes database.
I'm wondering if our Bayes token database is too big, and why.
Based on some posts to this list, I decided to try converting our Bayes and AWL
databases to InnoDB to improve performance. So I co
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> > We just received a 419 spam with a 642 KB JPG file. It would be nice
> if SpamAssassin could at least look at the text of messages like that.
> >
> >
> Wouldn't FuzzyOCR
> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> The samples I looked at could easily be stopped otherwise (I don't
> >> "usuall" get a lot of lottery mail with a
> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The samples I looked at could easily be stopped otherwise (I don't
> "usuall" get a lot of lottery mail with a large .tif from a gmail
> address!!). but it's not worth the pain. if spammers start sending
> large
> messages, things will change...
We just
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
Solaris 9 SPARC
For the past few days I have noticed SpamAssassin takes much longer to process
messages between about 10:00am and 1:00pm EDT. It doesn't appear to be a
memory problem or a problem with our DNS server. To try to figure i
> From: Michał Jęczalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spam flooding recent days
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a huge increase of spam rate in past 2-3 weeks. Most of it
> are messages with some quite normal Subject:, often (but not
> neccesarily)
> referring to some fake event (i.e. some polit
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5591
> -Original Message-
> From: Asif Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:59 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrade SpamAssassin failing
>
> Still looking for some suggestion on th
> From: Andreas Ntaflos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To spamassassin this spam appears to come from myself. It scored a low
> AWL but
> over 16 points all in all so the next message received from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] would certainly get high AWL score.
>
> My questions are these: did I get this right
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which is all about
> these char sets. No REs, almost no thinking required, no headache. A
> single line, and you're done.
What's the best way to test the character set for use in a meta rule?
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > > performance benefits. There aren't
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it.
I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to compile.
(This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a
Is it safe to use unbounded quantifiers like + and {2,} in uri rules? I avoid
them in regular body rules.
L
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Googlepages & Live
Some time ago (and more than once) there have been discussions on this list
about email containing hyperlinks where the link text is a URL that doesn't
match the URL in the link HREF, and the pros and cons of testing for and
scoring these mismatched links. My management has raised this issue.
The documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd shows examples like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
What if the sending server has no rDNS? Is there a way to use this feature
with a numeric IP instead of a rDNS domain? If so, what is the syntax?
Thanks, Larry
This morning on one of our servers, spamd was having problems. There
were 8 spamd children running, but "top" showed only two of them were
using any CPU time even though there was a backlog of messages to be
processed. The log file included lines like this:
Aug 24 08:49:22 localhost spamd[21051]
> From: Leon Kolchinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > The first time I run sa-update after a v3.2.3 install, I get the
> > following warnings:
> >
> > rules: score undef for rule 'MISSING_SUBJECT' in ''
'MISSING_SUBJECT'
> at
> > ...
>
> The score MISSING_SUBJECT is removed from 3.1.x and 3.2.x
The first time I run sa-update after a v3.2.3 install, I get the
following warnings:
rules: score undef for rule 'MISSING_SUBJECT' in '' 'MISSING_SUBJECT' at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
line 2140.
rules: score undef for rule 'EMPTY_MESSAGE' in '' 'EMPTY_M
SpamAssassin v3.2.3, Perl 5.8.8, Solaris 9
What would cause this error?
t/spamd_hup.ok 1/110# Failed test 5 in t/spamd_hup.t
at line 40
# t/spamd_hup.t line 40 is: ok (-e $pid_file) or warn "$pid_file does
not exist post restart";
log/spamd.pid does not exist post r
I don't see it. How long does it take to get to the mirrors?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Mason
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:39 PM
> To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Is it possible to get zone transfers of the iXhash data?
In the SA 3.2.2 announcement was this item:
- bug 5548: Certain mail input can take a long time to scan with 100%
CPU
utilisation, due to backtracking in a rule's regexp. fix
but when I went to look up the bug, I didn't have permission. Could
somebody give me more detail on this bug? In parti
I have been asked to look into Microsoft Antigen Spam Manager (and MS
Forefront for Exchange Server). Does anybody have any information (or
can point me to independent reviews) as to how good this product is and
how it compares with SpamAssassin?
Thanks ...
> From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that could
be
> > hostnames ala "copy www.example.com into your browser".
>
> This is fairly nonfunctional. I've been chasing around all sorts of
> FPs that seem to hit pretty much every mess
> From: Hamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Small problem with SA 3.2.1... I'm using a mysql database. The DB
works
> fine for amavisd-new, and SA AWL. e.g.
>
> [438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connected to
> DBI:mysql:sadb:ixx:
> [438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based using username:
in the "DNS tests getting aborted" thread?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
________
From: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2007 22:01
> From: Steven W. Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh
> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
> Preparing...
###
> [100%]
> 1:perl-Mail-Spa
When I run "make test" for v3.2.1, why do some of the dnsbl tests
sporadically fail? For instance:
t/dnsbl.Not found: P_2 =
[127.0.0.4]
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 635
Not found: P_7 =
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2
N
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1
running on Perl 5.8.8
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.004)
I've started seeing the "spamd: handle_user unable to find user:"
message in the spamd log file. This was not happening in v3.2.0. We
are starting spamd with this command:
spamd -d -u s
> From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Daniel J McDonald writes:
> >> So, you can't build the RPM as root.
> >>
> >>
> >> I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user
> build
> >> directory tree, compiled it under
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> > Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or does it just
> fix
> > the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
>
> You might try it and see if
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: sa-compile and SARE
>
> > So, can we now remove the "use bytes;" line?
>
> Should be able to. If this doesn't work we have some m
> From: Abba Communications [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think I just noticed a conflict. Not sure if I made the mistake or
not,
> yet I probably did.
>
> In my init.pre I have
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> uncommented
>
> and in my
>
> local.cf I have purposely s
> From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote:
>
> > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required
> Crypt::OpenSSL::Random
> > and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to
> be
> > built successfully because
We have just upgraded from v3.1.8 to v3.2.0. We invoke spamc as
follows:
spamc -H -E -t 180 -s 20 -d spamd.ornl.gov
# nslookup spamd.ornl.gov
Name:spamd.ornl.gov
Addresses: 160.91.4.92, 160.91.1.172
This used to connect equally to the two hosts, but now it makes almost
al
> -Original Message-
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If he is getting the UTF-8 error, this would indeed be odd, since he
is
> using perl-5.8.8 which supposedly handles those regexps which causes
the
> error.
>
> What SARE rules are you running Larry?
/usr/local/spam
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Did you have a massive volume of "Malformed UTF-8" warning messages in
the
> syslog output?
No, I upgraded Perl to v5.8.8, which got rid of the warning messages but
there was still a performance problem. Adding "use bytes" seems to have
fixed
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Poor performance with v3.2.0
>
> It would be interesting on some system experiencing this slowdown to
put
> 'use bytes' back into SA and see what happens with the performance.
This
> wouldn't be any sort of a solution, but it would be a
>
> Took 10 mins on my 2.8gh 512mb ram, with a bunch of sares rules.
>
> You using .12.0 of re2c?
Yes.
I think most of the time is spent in the rule extraction steps and the
gcc compiles, and not in the re2c steps. (gcc is v3.4.6)
> > Yes, you are right, after "use warnings;". I ran SA3.2 on
>> Bayes auto expiries (taking to long and getting killed)? I think
>> that's a 600 second timeout.
We're not using auto-expiry. Bayes expiry is being done with a batch
job.
> It would be interesting on some system experiencing this slowdown to
put
> 'use bytes' back into SA and see what happe
Running SpamAssassin v3.2.0 on Solaris 9, perl v5.8.8.
I am getting really poor performance with v3.2.0 compared with v3.1.8.
Average scan time per message is doubled (or worse). I'm also seeing
messages like this in the log file (although not all the time):
May 7 17:10:20 localhost spamd
> From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
> HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
>
> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
> /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at /usr/
> > 2) I tried to compile the rules to see how much speed increase I
could
> > get, but it didn't work. After running sa-compile and uncommenting
the
> > Rule2XSBody plugin, I got the following error:
> >
> > # spamassassin --lint
> > ld.so.1: /usr/local/bin/spamassassin: fatal: relocation error:
Testing v3.2.0-rc3 on Solaris 8
I'm finding zillions of the following errors in the log file:
Apr 24 10:13:27 emaildev.ornl.gov spamd[12593]: Malformed UTF-8
character (unexpected non-continuation by
te 0x00, immediately after start byte 0xce) in pattern match (m//) at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sa
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 PRERELEASE available!
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a
*PRERELEASE*,
> not the full release of 3.2.0.
I have found the following (non-fatal) issues with SA v3.2.0-rc3:
Any chance of fixing Bug #5420 before the final release?
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5420
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@Spa
> From: Andy Figueroa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Woo Hoo - that's a good trick and good intel. Thinking ... Won't it
> still try to use /usr/share/spamassassin for rules and
> /var/lib/spamassassin for updates and /etc/mail/spamasassin for
> configuration and so forth? Can't do that without r
> From: Dave Koontz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not neccessarily. Put your awl on a sql database and add a timestamp
> column
> to the awl table, which gets automagically a new timestamp by the dbms
> each
> time a record is updated. The "timestamp" column type in Mysql is such
a
> type.
>
> show
The doc for BODY rules says "All HTML tags and line breaks will be
removed before matching". I was also told on this list that multiple
whitespace was compressed to single space characters. So if I have text
like this:
xyzzy
abcde
and the following rules:
bodyT_LMRTESTB1 /xyzzy a
Has anybody come up with a rule for these yet? I tried the following:
body ORNL_B0RKEN1 /^\d{3,5}\n{1,3}$/s
describe ORNL_B0RKEN1 B0rken spamware, message just contains a short
number
scoreORNL_B0RKEN1 1
This matches the spam message, but it also matches messages where the
number is foll
> From: Dennis Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
>
> > Question 2: someone asked why my module is "Botnet" instead of
> > "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Botnet". The answer is: when I
> > first started this (and this is/was my first SA Plugin authoring
> > attempt), I tried that and it didn't w
> From: Ben Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Greetings, List!
> I just upgraded from sa 3.1.3 to sa 3.1.6 and am having some weird
> problems with sa-update that I've never seen before. It would seem
that
> my sys rules/default rules directory (/usr/share/spamassassin) is not
> being loaded by
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> I changed my procmailrc to;
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> | spamd -L -c -s 512000
Shouldn't that be spamc?
In Long.pm, go to line 91 and change this
my $tmp = `hostname` . '.' . `domainname`;
to this
my $tmph = `hostname`;
my $tmpd = `domainname`;
my $tmp = "$tmph.$tmpd";
> -Original Message-
> From: John Goubeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Friday, October 06,
> From: Mike Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The internet is a great place for raising more questions than it
answers
> :D
>
> Given all the opinions I think I will move the caught spam's into the
> learning cycle however i'm also going to make sure that each spam is
> only ever fed through t
> From: Mark G. Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with incorrect URIBL hits on incoming forwarded
messages
> that have been mangled by Lotus Notes.
>
> I have a customer with the domain name "Yimaging.com".
> (Not really "Y").
>
> "ng.com" is on the URIBL bla
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
