> From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:sa-l...@alexb.ch] > > On 3/4/2010 7:34 PM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > >> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] > >> > >> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote: > >>> On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > >>>>> Is there still a reason for this update channel? > >>>>> > >>>>> 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net > >>>>> > >>>>> Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0? > >> ^^^^^ > >>>> 20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ? > >>> 90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't > >> upgraded > >>> to SA 3.3.x > >> Thanks for that addition and confirmation of status. :) > >> > >> The original question and hence my answer was specifically about > 3.3.x, > >> though, and whether it still is needed from external sources with > that > >> version. > >> > >>> I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf > >>> > >>> Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported. > >>> > >>> Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage. > > > > Thanks, but I'm confused, as there are domains in 90_sare_freemail.cf > that are not currently in 20_freemail_domains.cf. > > Hi Larry... > > Never got around to do the diff... your msg triggered :-) > Unless I borked it, it should now included the missing from > 90_sare_freemail.cf
I still don't see the domains in 20_freemail_domains.cf. Thanks, Larry
