> -----Original Message----- > From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk] > > >IMPORTANT: If sorbs does not get picked-up by a new host, will SA > > >developers be ready to roll-out an SA update to remove the sorbs > rules, so > > >that we don't suffer a bunch of timeouts? Or how does that work? > > On 23.06.09 09:29, Jeff Moss wrote: > > WHAT? Sorbs and Spamhaus are polar opposites. Spamhaus is a great > > organization while SORBS is a POS that helped give all blacklists a > bad name. > > sorbs makes good job, although there are some whiners not understanding > the > stuff... > > > I don't know if SpamAssassin has ever used it. > > it still does: > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=2 n=3 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.615 0 0.877 # n=0 n=2 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 0.001 0 0.353 # n=0 n=2 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS 0 0.182 0 0.801 # n=0 n=2 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0 1.117 0 0.619 # n=0 n=2 > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3
Notice that the SORBS "spam sources" list (the one that charged a delisting fee) is not used. > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Remember half the people you know are below average.
