I installed both patches and still get errors in some of the dnsbl tests. Here is a possibly relevant section of t/log/d.dns/1 from a system where the test succeeded:
[27718] dbg: check: running tests for priority: 500 [27718] dbg: async: select found 1 socks ready [27718] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-b.com took 4 seconds to look up (multi.surbl.org.:uribl-example-b.com) [27718] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-a.com took 4 seconds to look up (multi.uribl.com.:uribl-example-a.com) ... [27718] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-a.com took 4 seconds to look up (bl.open-whois.org.:uribl-example-a.com) [27718] dbg: async: queries completed: 73 started: 0 [27718] dbg: async: queries active: at Fri Jun 15 11:42:27 2007 [27718] dbg: dns: success for 0 of 73 queries [27718] dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=18.85 And here is the corresponding log where the tests failed: [10362] dbg: check: running tests for priority: 500 [10362] dbg: async: select found no socks ready [10362] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-b.com took 2 seconds to look up (multi.surbl.org.:uribl-example-b.com) [10362] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-a.com took 2 seconds to look up (multi.uribl.com.:uribl-example-a.com) ... [10362] dbg: uridnsbl: query for uribl-example-a.com took 2 seconds to look up (bl.open-whois.org.:uribl-example-a.com) [10362] dbg: async: queries completed: 44 started: 0 [10362] dbg: async: queries active: DNSBL-A=10 DNSBL-TXT=19 at Fri Jun 15 11:59:06 2007 [10362] dbg: async: select found no socks ready [10362] dbg: async: queries completed: 0 started: 0 [10362] dbg: async: queries active: DNSBL-A=10 DNSBL-TXT=19 at Fri Jun 15 11:59:07 2007 [10362] dbg: async: select found no socks ready ... [10362] dbg: async: queries completed: 0 started: 0 [10362] dbg: async: queries active: DNSBL-A=10 DNSBL-TXT=19 at Fri Jun 15 11:59:27 2007 [10362] dbg: async: escaping: must have lost requests [10362] dbg: async: aborting remaining lookups [10362] dbg: dns: success for 44 of 73 queries [10362] dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=14.85 So what is going on, and why aren't my socks ready? (Sounds like a laundry problem...) BTW, looking up "134.88.73.210.sb.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org" (one of the failed lookups) from the command line returns a successful answer immediately. From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 3:41 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: "make test" dnsbl tests sporadically fail Possibly related to http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5511 as discussed in the "DNS tests getting aborted" thread? Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK ________________________________ From: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2007 22:01 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: "make test" dnsbl tests sporadically fail When I run "make test" for v3.2.1, why do some of the dnsbl tests sporadically fail? For instance: t/dnsbl..................... Not found: P_2 = <dns:134.88.73.210.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.4] # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Not found: P_7 = <dns:134.88.73.210.sb.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org?type=TXT> # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Not found: P_4 = <dns:14.35.17.212.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.1] t/dnsbl.....................NOK 1# Failed test 3 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #3 Not found: P_3 = <dns:18.13.119.61.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.12] # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #4 Not found: P_5 = <dns:226.149.120.193.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.1] # Failed test 5 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #5 t/dnsbl.....................NOK 2 Not found: P_1 = <dns:98.3.137.144.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.2] # Failed test 6 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #6 Not found: P_6 = <dns:example.com.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org> [127.0.0.2] # Failed test 7 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #7 Not found: P_15 = DNSBL_RHS t/dnsbl.....................NOK 3# Failed test 8 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #8 Not found: P_17 = DNSBL_SB_FLOAT t/dnsbl.....................NOK 4# Failed test 9 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #9 Not found: P_18 = DNSBL_SB_STR # Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #10 Not found: P_16 = DNSBL_SB_TIME # Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #11 t/dnsbl.....................NOK 5 Not found: P_10 = DNSBL_TEST_DYNAMIC # Failed test 12 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #12 Not found: P_12 = DNSBL_TEST_RELAY # Failed test 13 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #13 t/dnsbl.....................NOK 6 Not found: P_11 = DNSBL_TEST_SPAM # Failed test 14 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #14 Not found: P_8 = DNSBL_TEST_TOP # Failed test 15 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #15 Not found: P_9 = DNSBL_TEST_WHITELIST t/dnsbl.....................NOK 7# Failed test 16 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #16 Not found: P_14 = DNSBL_TXT_RE # Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #17 Not found: P_13 = DNSBL_TXT_TOP t/dnsbl.....................NOK 8# Failed test 18 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #18 t/dnsbl.....................NOK 9Output can be examined in: log/d.dns/1 t/dnsbl.....................FAILED tests 1-18 Failed 18/23 tests, 21.74% okay If I run t/dnsbl.t later, a smaller number of the subtests fail. If I repeat it later, a different set of dnsbl subtests fail. There is nothing obviously wrong with the DNS server. What causes this problem?
