4.0.0 is a useless bitch, i'm about to install
rspamd
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:36 PM Nick Edwards
wrote:
> Venting
>
> Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
> apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
>
> thankfully
Venting
Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
thankfully I chose to install this whilst we left for lunch, but 45mins
later to my horror it was still trying to install, why? because its tests
failed for ti
Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference between enable dkim in
amavisd-new and having it set to 0 letting spamassassin just do its thing
with loadmodule dkim?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:26 AM Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 12:57:32PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> >
> >
> > Amavisd-
Hi,
We've been using a separate product to do this, but it struck me, maybe
spamassassin can do this easier (or without having to call yet another
binary to run as can over mails)
Rules that look at URLs in a html message href and src tags, check the "A"
tag to see if there is a URL there, and i
ATT Moderators
li...@rhsoft.net is banned user Reindl Harald of thelounge.net
Received: from mail.thelounge.net (mail.thelounge.net [91.118.73.15])
by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with
ESMTPS id EB9C55F4EC
for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:26:39 +
(UTC)
R
clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.05.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Vincent Fox:
>
>> SPF is only about envelopes?
>>
>
> yes
>
> Unless you are Microsoft, who check against the From in the h
t to do to over come if it YOU disagree with it,
acting like a 2yo baby going wah wah wah rolling over the floor temper
tamping to try get his own way will NOT work.
On 1/26/16, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.01.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Just look at the energy he's
just ignore reindl, most the world does (on the few lists he's not
been booted off - yet), because its his way or the wrong way - in his
eyes only of course, and history shows your wasting your time trying
to explain to him thats not how the world works, no-one is here to
make it work according to
Hey there,
In my final hours (34) at job X before moving back home to Australia
to start job Y next week, I would love to solve an issue I've been
seeing for a few weeks now, some domains in eval are wrongfully
hitting.
Take postfix.org for example, it has no A record, so this check should
return
On 16.10.15 09:10, Nick Edwards wrote:
>>Was there a change recently to the spamassassin code for SPF?
>>
>>Lately, any messages that come in via secondary MX's are failing, this
>>nevefr used to be the case
>
> the MX servers for your domain MUST be listed in internal
Was there a change recently to the spamassassin code for SPF?
Lately, any messages that come in via secondary MX's are failing, this
nevefr used to be the case
Most common is facebook, lately they are marked as complete fail did
someone break something? I assumed it used trusted networks or such
://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/527924
I could go on but id be here all month, and next month, and the month after
On 9/16/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.09.2015 um 04:25 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 9/15/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> A
On 9/15/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.09.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>>>> and no, i am not the package maintainer but
On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
and no, i am not the package maintainer but the first person who would
file a bug for *any* package which rely on a internet connection due
update
>
>>Am 14.09.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - f
Hey,
Kind of had enough of regular URIBL's not getting this stuff, so
wondering has anyone wrote any rules they want to share on/off list to
match on mismatched URI links,
example
the displayed version in mail might be www.example.com, but the actual
URI when you highlight or click on it, is foob
On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Is there any reason
>>
>> reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error"
>> to fail t_dkim_invalid
>
> yes, it hits way too oft
Is there any reason
reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error"
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1,
On 3/26/15, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:36:36 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> What make you think you have the right to put a mail for a different
>> person to /dev/null without reject it proper and so sender nor RCPT
>> are aware?
>
> People who sign up for our service do so
On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.03.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> bots have not learned from 55x messages EVER they dont care, they
>>>> never have they never will, they will resend their shit 50 ti
On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>>> if i need to take the phone and ask the admin if a mail was discarded or
>>> just not delivered at the moment the mailservice is shit
>>
>> get into the real world, and there
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> It only applies to German based providers, located in Germany, serving
>> Germany.
>> A similar rule applies in Sweden too, and there are exceptions.
>>
>> I can reject who
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> that game is over at the moment you got a complaint from the sender
>>> proving you MX has responded with "250 OK" and the message was
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Niamh Holding:
>> Hello Reindl,
>>
>> Wednesday, March 25, 2015, 9:51:48 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> RH> i don't know the UK laws but in germany it's for sure not allowed
>> RH> because it's legally classified identical to a postman says
On 3/25/15, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello Reindl,
>
> Wednesday, March 25, 2015, 9:51:48 AM, you wrote:
>
> RH> i don't know the UK laws but in germany it's for sure not allowed
> RH> because it's legally classified identical to a postman says "meh i don't
>
> RH> walk to go upstairs today and th
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> and in fact i was *never ever* that abusive as you are all the time
> beause there is a difference in get heatet in a technical discussion or
> like you do absue for the sake of abuse
>
hahahaha thankfulyl google shows otherwise
> so you better stop making yo
ed or
moderated from most lists on the net - you only have yourself to blame
no one else numbnuts.
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 13:09 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Ed
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
>>> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>>>
>>
>> HAHAHA reindl do
On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>
> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>
>
HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no friends and no
one would have him, he can start a fight when he's the only tosser in
the room.
On 3/15/15, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:22 schrieb David F. Skoll:
>> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:17:27 +0100
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, but big spam mails are extrem rare, i wouldnt invest time in that
>>
>> They are quite rare, but common enough IMO that our customers
On 2/22/15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Axb skrev den 2015-02-21 12:09:
>> DOH! - need more coffee...
>
> whisky free ? :-)
>
when corresponding with reindl, you need whiskey, just to tolerate his rhetoric
On 2/22/15, Axb wrote:
> On 02/21/2015 04:04 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Axb wrote:
>>>
>>> Many moons ago, obviously before you started using SA, what you *now*
>>> consider "dynamic", was very static with less than than handfull of
>>> changes
>>> /release.
>>
>
g it,
>>> no more
>>> than I would waste time tucking in the shirt and straightening the tie
>>> and
>>> shining the shoes of a salesguy who showed up to sell me something.
>>>
>>> It's also not really my job to explain the concept of the bli
On 12/5/14, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/2014 6:24 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 20:22 -0600, Dave Pooser wrote:
>>> > strange, it indicates 12pt, and looks same size when returned on list
>>> > as
>>> >everyone elses, something must be a miss, hows this one? it's from
:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 23:42 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> fedora list MODERATED
>>>>>
>>>>> not true for many months
>>>>>
>>>> oh because you "allegedly&
google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not
dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully
google does not lie, or hide.
On 11/27/14, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Anthony Cartmell wrote:
>
>>> How about you take your own advice. On any of my
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
fedora list MODERATED
>>>
>>> not true for many months
>>>
>> oh because you "allegedly" unsubscribed
>
> bullshit - fedora devel active all the time
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-November/thread.html
>
dont mix words reindl im
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 13:30 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where
>> not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like
>> acid to them it is my aum in life to rid t
its quite painstaking but I reluctantly agree with Reindl, if you are
going to post crap like this, post details
On 11/23/14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> No more info in public from me
WARNING
apache list FINAL WARNING
postfix list BANNED
says all anyone needs to know about your modus operandi
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 13:19 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just
>> fuck off to
how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just
fuck off to your own hole you troll every list you join you act like
god but your nothing but an offensive troll nobody
On 11/25/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * don't hijack threads
> * don't send "unsubscribe" to the whole list
On 11/26/14, Paul Gardiner wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner:
>>> I drive spamassassin using spampd.
>>>
>>> I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken
>>> me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two c
was on this list a long time before you showed
up here, so check hte definition of stalk, you fruitcake, I warned you
what would happen if you contact me again, what happens now is your
own doing skitzo boy.
On 10/3/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 12:56 schrieb Nick E
jdebert, (since im not reply to the bully troll)
he doesnt learn, worried about flame wars but kicks off by calling
other people smart asses, just ignore him, most of the rest of the
internet has done for a while
On 10/1/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert:
>>
Dont pay too much attention to reindl, he is a well known internet
troll, and highly abusive to those who disagree with him, hes been
kicked off or moderated on so many lists now, most folks have lost
count, and most folks ignore him, the stain is best treated as a
stain, washed away with good rule
Hi Karsten,
On 12/1/13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:30 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> Hi, have a problem with our internal uribl
>>
>> urirhsblINT_URI uri.int.lan. A
>> bodyINT_URI eval:check_uridnsbl('INT_URI')
Hi, have a problem with our internal uribl
urirhsblINT_URI uri.int.lan. A
bodyINT_URI eval:check_uridnsbl('INT_URI')
describeINT_URI Contains a URI listed in internal URIBL
tflags INT_URI net
score INT_URI 3
this rule performs lookups if in normal t
46 matches
Mail list logo
