kinds of fraud using spamassassin?
Thanks
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Domain Services
To: j...@raats.org
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 3:14 PM
Subject: Domain Notification JCM RAATS This is your Final Notice of Domain
Listing - JARASOFT.COM
Attention
t me". Not sure
if this fits your issue, but sounds like it. If not using Sendmail, then
something "like" milter-regex perhaps.
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
ecks
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
---
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT s...@mikey.com
Thanks in advance for your help.
--
Jack
At 06:29 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealin
At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
>> issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so
>> went back to latest version.
ICountry _URICountry_
remove_header spam Level
Thanks for any advice for a fix.
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
At 03:53 PM 12.30.2010 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>On tor 30 dec 2010 15:45:10 CET, "Jack L. Stone" wrote
>
>> Ooops! that module "body_0.pm" not body_500.pm
>
>yes sa-compiles pt priority rules
>
>body foo /foo/
>priority foo 500
>body bar /ba
TOP POST correction
Ooops! that module "body_0.pm" not body_500.pm
Jack
At 08:33 AM 12.30.2010 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>I've just caught up with another issue noticed when manually running some
>spam through SA.
>
>Perhaps I have an obsolete module - "bod
7; compiled
rules (100%)
Thanks for any guidence on this one.
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
ike.net, haven't got the message.
>
>Just a thought.
>
>Ted
>
>> Warren
>
>
Ted:
Very comprehensive coverage. All of my net checks are done at the MTA level
(sendmail) and none in SA -- it's turned off. What is the benefit of
checking twice? Maybe I missed the benefit.
Thanks for this discussion as it is good to keep up with those effective BLs.
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
s, my server load is not so bad now. It used to be heavy
indeed before adding the front filters.
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
At 01:34 PM 12.27.2010 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:25:28 -0600
>"Jack L. Stone" wrote:
>
>> >I don't think so. That message typically comes about when a DBI
>> >database handle goes out of scope without disconnect() having bee
ound like a disconnect flaw, and I may experiment with adding a disconnect
on the offending line.
Thanks for the helpful input!
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
At 12:19 PM 12.27.2010 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>On 12/27/10 12:14 PM, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> At 11:43 PM 12.26.2010 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>>
>> You must be really busy minding everyone's business.
>>
>> If you don't know an answe
At 11:43 PM 12.26.2010 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 09:04 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> At 09:07 AM 12.24.2010 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> Guess I'm the only one with this issue or was it an ignorant question?
>
>Guess you're a
At 09:07 AM 12.24.2010 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Top post:
Guess I'm the only one with this issue or was it an ignorant question?
Jack
>Using:
>FBSD-7.x
>p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1_3
>perl-5.8.9_3
>mysql-server-5.0.90
>
>I'm getting a lot of these error message
mail spamd[24172]: Issuing rollback() due to DESTROY
without explicit disconnect() of DBD::mysql::db handle bayes:127.0.0.1:3306
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm
line 1516, line 2.
Thanks for any suggestions....
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
S
On Wed, April 21, 2010 12:05 am, Bret Miller wrote:
> On 4/20/2010 3:09 PM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>> Hi all.
>> I noticed Spamhaus made available a new URIBL. I updated my SA package
>> (debian testing) to the latest version and I wanted to implement check
>> on
>&
Hi all.
I noticed Spamhaus made available a new URIBL. I updated my SA package
(debian testing) to the latest version and I wanted to implement check on
the DBL list too.
How do I configure spamassassin to do that?
Thanks,
-JK
n_org/
or where it was for 3.2.5? ../share/mail/spamassassin?
I would vote for the update directory and automagically run sa-update when
installing the port unattended.
Jack Raats
Quoting Dan Schaefer :
As that's really a postfix question, not a SpamAssassin question,
if you don't get an answer here you may want to try on a postfix
mailing list.
I know. Since everybody here is so great at answering my questions
so far, I thought I'd try this list first.
$> cat
Quoting LuKreme :
On 25-Jun-2009, at 16:01, John Rudd wrote:
People who complain that the PBL is blocking things that aren't spam
kind of don't get the point of the PBL. The PBL's definition means
that it will block non-spam. It should also block a lot of spam, but
the fact that it will block
How long will this go before Godwin's law finally kicks in? Now I'm
just watching for the fun of it .
Quoting Res :
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
1. It's 'You're' a joke - not 'your' a joke
Ah the classic sign of someone in defeat, has to nit pick someones gramme
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SPF-Query.
Is this a bug in sa-update or a bug of the portssytem of freebsd???
Thanks for your time
Jack
messages? By disallowing html messages???
Jack
Have a look at Black hole DNS. http://www.malwaredomains.com
jp
Quoting Ray Jette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry if this is off topic. I am using a Microsoft DNS server. I am
putting a big load on it with Mailscanner / Spamassassin and MTA
RBL's. Would you recommend that I use a local BIND Cac
It's probably whitelisted because some imbecile decided to whitelist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . We had a similar incident where a "peeved" sysadmin
decided to whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED] . He had two contects at msn that had
been errouneously tagged as spam, he thought his response was
reasonabl
Hi Grant,
First update the ports (see the handbook how (cvsup-without-gui and
portupgrade))
After this you'll run portupgrade -a
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:58 PM
Subject: Upgra
ll (sh). I've read the man pages on the
shells but no joy with various efforts:
(this is sh) spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep database
(what for csh?) spamassassin -D --lint ?commands?
Thanks again,
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
anyway. To read
>about input/output redirection. It can be quite useful in many other
>cases.
>
>--
> Kruk@ -\ | Microsoft Office 2000: Wzrasta Twoje IQ
Yes, it was the shell "csh" I use. Tried "sh" and the suggested redirects
work fine.
Thanks
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
mber this being posted on this list apprx 2 years ago and I can't find
it now.
Piping and grepping is easy to grab on other commands, but this one escapes
me.
Appreciate any help.
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
Quoting Lars Ebeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Got this after sending message earlier to this list. Could someone
here explain it?
The most apparent explanation would be that Antigen is being stupid.
jp
--
Simple compliance is a hacker's best friend
-
Quoting Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 24.07.08 14:35, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Are there ANY leagal reasons to declare someons MX as there MX?
Yes, a mistake, or a false assumption by ISP's client.
We have DNS server sharing relationships with some of our biz
partners. I
Quoting Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ramprasad wrote:
I don't care what it's written in but I'm thinking that xinetd
might be easiest. What I want is something to record the IP
address of any host connection to port 25. Then going to need it
to run a one line script file that runc
Quoting raulbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks i guess.
... sarcastic responses this question recieved. A simple "this is not a good
idea and here is why.." would of suffice but thanks again to those who were
helpful.
Think of it as "hazing the new guy" or "good natured ribbing".
especially
I'm not sure if this can even be handled, but I thought I'd put it out there.
Someone is using our email address to originate spam. We are getting bombed
with "Mail undeliverable" etc. messages from failed spam delivery attempts.
This morning I check my inbox and found almost 100 of these since
Quoting Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I did trace it back to this IP enewsletter11.ruceci.com
(enewsletter.ruceci.com) [208.74.102.200]
which is a datacenter in KS: Arsalon Technologies LLC
Send them a friendly/helpful note (include packet traces or mail logs)
since we will politel
Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> describe SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI Includes a multiple dots domain name
> body SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI /^http?\:\/\/([a-z0-9_\-A-Z]+\.)+\./
Have you ever seen these? Would it work, does any MUA or browser
silently collapse multiple dots?
I saw on
Quoting John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Plus, you probably meant /^https?
right you are, sir. thx
--
Framework? I don't need no steenking framework!
@fferent Security Labs: Isolate/Insulate/Innovate
http://www.afferents
OOpsie - typo:
"body" should have been "uri" in the second one.
describe SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI Includes a multiple dots domain name
uri SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI /^http?\:\/\/([a-z0-9_\-A-Z]+\.)+\./
score SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI 1.8
jp
Quoting Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Maybe try these:
describe SILLYLONGDOMAINURI Includes a very long domain name gt 8 levels
uri SILLYLONGDOMAINURI /^http?\:\/\/([a-z0-9_\-A-Z]+\.){8,}/
score SILLYLONGDOMAINURI 1.8
describe SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI Includes a multiple dots domain name
body SILLYDOTSDOMAINURI /^http?\:\/\/([a-z0
Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
HI Jack,
Any chance of sharing your rules for this?!
Cheers,
Jeremy
Sure:
score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 1.800
header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 ALL =~
/^Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m
describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 Has Bobax Generated Message-Id, type 2
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jack Pepper writes:
I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was
already catching them.
apologies for the noise on the list.
I found my problem in the faq. I was missing the "m" on the end ogf
I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was
already catching them.
apologies for the noise on the list.
jp
--
Framework? I don't need no steenking framework!
@fferent Security Labs: Isolate/Insulate/In
This info popped up on the emerging-Threats list. I have watched our
mail servers and have confirmed that it works.
The problem is that my attempts to create Spamassin rules for it never
fire off. Can I get some tutelage from the list on creating rules for
these unique conditions:
Messa
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "spam"
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: whitelis
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spam"
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: whitelist
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jack Gostl wrote:
I have an odd problem. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have an odd problem. I have a user receiving spam from something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since he does business with verybigcompany.com,
he had them in his white list, and as expected, the spam slipped through.
Based on the advice I got in this newsgroup, I ch
- Original Message -
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Message bypassed
Jack Gostl wrote:
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
spamassassin headers at
Jack Gostl wrote:
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
spamassassin headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000
bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no spamassassin
headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000 bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very, very large bmp file. Does
anyo
t could grow, so I'm
looking for any suggestions.
Thanks
Jack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wpUDBQFHQCglFhDacYjJc7UBAcU1A/wI/t496IyaSMjSwpS6ytq4KeoU9gN1yDTK
b1A1PDgFZVlSwYaQr0lICMGxmfxT1O7X2nSBF6ECedJ6j8jyZkywyoUQTrTQmbMQ
huyVLqFm8VdICRL
ssing library or
missing parameter on the build, but I'm not sure where to take it.
Thanks
Jack
thus commit joe jobs.
>'Nuf said?
H, I could be a false-positive idiot. I'd better create another special
filter and call it the "ex-wife filter." (:-))
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
ere:
Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3
make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so
gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE spamc/libspamc.c
spamc/utils.c -o spamc/libspamc.so -shared -L/usr/local/lib -lz
/usr/bin/ld: /var/tmp//cchaPM1S.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can
ar/db/spamassassin/compiled/3.002000/auto lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at (eval 1599)
line 1.
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
At 06:45 PM 5.7.2007 +, Duane Hill wrote:
>On Mon, 7 May 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> At 04:51 PM 5.7.2007 +, you wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>>
>>> [SNIP]
>>>> There are a LOT of subtle changes... But
project, see http://www.dnswl.org/.
>
>-- Matthias
>
When I run manual test:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> host 2.0.0.127.list.dnswl.org
...I get
2.0.0.127.list.dnswl.org has address 127.0.10.0
Not return of 127.0.0.2???
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
At 07:56 AM 5.5.2007 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jack L. Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:20 AM
>> To: Justin Mason; users@spamassassin.apache.org;
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL P
At 10:03 AM 5.4.2007 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>>> and contains a significant number of changes and major enhanc
.org/downloads.cgi?update=200705021400
>
Any projection when SA-3.2 will be in the FBSD ports? Sent email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but bounced back.
Thanks for any news on this
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
Well... I'm convinced. I turned off autolearn a week ago, and things have
never been smoother. Its a shame really, that's a nice feature, but for some
reason it waters down the Bayes resolution until its almost useless.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" &l
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Peacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:56 AM
Subject: Re: Bayes resolution gettin weaker
Hi,
Jack Gostl wrote:
I've been watching this for awhile, and there is now a pat
I've been watching this for awhile, and there is now a pattern to what I'm
seeing.
I'm running a configuration with multiple users sharing a bayes files.
This is an interim move to facilitate the spamassassin upgrades, and like
many interim moves its been going on for a long time.
When I fir
o I retrain each night, feeding any missed spams plus any new hams
received back through sa-learn. I can't see how that makes it worse, but who
knows.
Thanks - Jack
I thought I'd mention that since I wiped and rebuilt my Bayes files my
success rate has jumped from 93% to 99+%. Considering the amount of spam
pouring into here, that's not bad at all.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Peacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 26, 200
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Anthony Peacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: Bayes
Whenever some spam slips through the filters, I save it in a separate
folder. Then, eac
anges, that your
Bayes has become poisoned. But I could be well wrong.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:09:24 -0500
"Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The amount of spam getting through my filters has been steadily
increasing. From a start of under two percent up to over ten percent.
nyone else seen this? Are there any suggestions as to how to deal with
this? Should I regularly rebuild the bayes files?
Appreciate any advice.
Jack
Well its back. I thought my bayes files had finally caught up to it, or
maybe one of the sa-update downloads did the trick, but now it returns like bad
meatloaf.
It astounds me how this slips under the Bayes radar.
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: "Dear Homeowner" spam
John Andersen writes:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:47
On 10 Jan 2007 at 18:21, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi, John: Looked at your stuff with interest, especially the
> > milter- regex.conf file.
> >
> > This line: header /Subject/i/[??
> > ...appears to b
more should be there and what does it do?
Sorry to shift from the procmail portion
Regards,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Now that you mention it, yes, it had a Geocities URL.
- Original Message -
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: "Dear Homeowner" spam
data: ntokens
0.000 0 1161347400 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1167885013 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime
0.000 0 1167919691 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 05529600 0 non-token data: last expire
earn=ham". I later
feed this back through sa-learn as spam, but what I'm wondering is whether
this undoes the damage to the Bayes databases caused by the autolearn=ham.
I'm considering lowering the autolearn threshhold to less than zero. I
wonder if anyone else has any thoughts on this as well.
Thanks
Jack
Hello,
I see the page at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SpamAssassin_on_Mac_OS_X_Server
recommends updating SA right away. Will this cause problems with
later Apple updates for Server? Has Apple updated SA in updates for
Tiger Server?
Thanks,
Jack
ion about the
MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY rule. So, I searched for the
keyword "MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY" on google but found that
the keyword "MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY" did not exist in
other places on the web. Is MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY an old
rule that does not exist in SpamAssassin any more?
Than
uot; .
Will SpamAssassin consider this as an invalid message
id and so consider the email as possible spam?
Thank you.
Jack
___
YM - 離線訊息
就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。
http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk
I guess I could do that, but these things usually only last a few days
anyway. Always have to trade off against the risk of a non-spam message
coming through. I was really surprised that the Bayes came up zero.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm getting dozens of messages touting a stock called TTEN. The odd thing about
the messages is that its getting assigned a Bayes score of zero.
Are there any rules out there for this?
Thanks
Jack
use milter-regex as the frontline wall and this regex for
catching fakers:
## HELO faking my own IP address
tempfail "Malformed HELO (can't be me)"
helo /^70\.86\.37\.82$/
HTH.
Regards,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
t of the spam, as well as
> screwing up
> the macro call.
>
> Loren
>
FWIW: I am receiving a few of those that are coming through one
of my web forms -- perhaps a robot test probe to see if form is
viable for the spammer use.
Regards,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
lock failed: A system call received
an interrupt.
I'm guessing that this is the result of two copies of spamd hitting the Bayes
files at once. Since we have several people sharing the same Bayes files, this
is a distinct possibility.
Is there any way to deal with this?
Thanks - Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spamassassin"
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: saupdate
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message - Fro
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spamassassin"
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: saupdate
Please keep replies on the list for the benefit of othe
nel
[27694] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
Question 2:
After running saupdate, I assume that all I have to do is to restart spamd. How
can I force spamd to restart and reload its rules? Can a do a simple kill -1?
Or do I need an actual kill and restart?
Thanks
Jack
g tho.
Any tips appreciated, pleaase.
Thanks,
Jack
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spam"
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Conversion
Jack Gostl wrote:
I've just done a trial conversion from spamassassin 3.0.3 to 3.1.7 and
the bayes return codes aren't being
I've just done a trial conversion from spamassassin 3.0.3 to
3.1.7 and the bayes return codes aren't being set. I should point out that this
is a "new" machine, and its entirely possible that I missed moving
something.
I installed the various CPAN pre-reqs, installed SpamAssassin,
then mov
University of Iowa
I haven't seen mention of adding more mail queues for sendmail's use. I run
several busy mail discussion lists + some fairly large customer mail lists
-- in additon to my user traffic.
I increased the number of queues (x10 then x20) and saw a blazing jump in
speed.
Something to consider???
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
n't all have to come at once, just from the
>same IP within any 24 hour period. This system works very well for
>dictionary attacks as well.
>
>Nigel
>
Nigel: Where & how do you set that probe -- ?? I like the sounds of that.
Thanks!
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
Converting to 3.1 is beginning to look better and better.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
Thanks for the response.
Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been running so well for s
- Original Message -
From: Steven Stern
To: Spamass
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:> Thanks for the response.>> Take it
slow with me, spamassassin has been running so well for so > long that I
haven't had to
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
(1) I currently have no local.cf. I assume the default location is
/etc/mail/spamassassin.
This seems rather amazing. This is the normal place tha
006 at 10:48 AM, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack
Gostl wrote:> Thanks for the response.> > Take it slow
with me, spamassassin has been running so well for so> long that I
haven't had to fiddle with it in ages and I don't> remember the
details. D
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 running on Perl version 5.8.2
under AIX 5.3. Starting a few months ago, I have b
this awhile ago, and tried
to upgrade to SpamAssassin version 3.1.1 running on Perl version 5.8.0,
and didn't see much improvement, so I left the prod machine alone.
I'm sure I'm not the only one with this problem. Has anyone had any success
with it?
Thanks...
Jack
h SpamAssassin 3.1 and it doesn't
seem to help.
Any suggestions?
Thanks - Jack
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
