----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: "Dear Homeowner" spam
John Andersen writes:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:47, Jack Gostl wrote:
> Now that you mention it, yes, it had a Geocities URL.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:09 PM
> Subject: Re: "Dear Homeowner" spam
One more reason to permanently blacklist geocities in SURBL IMHO.
Even a better reason for the Spamassassin team to find out how
this spammer manages to consistently evade all filters.
These spams have been slipping through for so long I'm starting
to suspect an inside job.
Ha!
Interestingly, those spams hit only one of my personal spamtraps. I
suspect careful listwashing. I've added a few rules for testing
now...
This is more important than it would seem. There are a growning number of
spams that are managing to completely evade the Bayse testing. There is one
from some jewelry chain, Russell Simons I think, that slips through with a
Bayes of 0.
