On 5 Dec 2006 at 20:50, Loren Wilton wrote: > > But there is no conclusion or discussion on what the point of > that > > type of message is. > > I would bet there is at least one person on this list that > knows the real > answer. But I strongly suspect he/she is a lurker and doesn't > post. > > That said, this shows all the signs of being a spam run > misfire. There is > probably a new program out there that was supposed to take > numbers in a form > like %12345% or some such and generate random spam bodies, or > at least the > frontend bayes poison text. Either the generator program had a > bug, or more > likely Novice Spammer had a bug and forgot the percent signs > (or whatever > magic characters were required for the macro expansion). > Novice Spammer > probably also forgot the important part of the spam, as well as > screwing up > the macro call. > > Loren >
FWIW: I am receiving a few of those that are coming through one of my web forms -- perhaps a robot test probe to see if form is viable for the spammer use. Regards, Jack L. Stone System Admin
