I
don't have a lot of confidence that they will continue to exist as a
company.
I don't think they should be in default SpamAssassin and if I experience
any more problems with them then I'm going to disable lookups.
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:18:18AM +, Laurent S. wrote:
> Some good RBL are not in standard spamassassin.
Out of interest, which DNSBLs do you use/recommend that are not in
standard spamassassin?
Thanks,
Andy
re different. Is the work worth it? Generally not;
other options exist.
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 01:24:02PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
> On 1/2/24 17:51, Andy Smith wrote:
> > - Have your users collect their your-org email by some means other
> >than SMTP, such as running an IMAP server and having them view
> >both th
ers collect their your-org email by some means other
than SMTP, such as running an IMAP server and having them view
both their gmail mailbox and their your-org inbox in one place (I
have no idea if that is feasible with gmail).
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:52:13AM -0400, Jared Hall wrote:
> On 9/29/2023 10:59 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> > 3.4.2. I know, it's ancient. An upgrade is planned but I'd still
> > like to know what the behaviour is. I understand if no one wants to
> > help a
callback on key
dns:A:73.233.187.66.zen.spamhaus.org
Sep 29 14:36:57.378 [2611] dbg: dns: hit
127.0.0.3
So this is normal behaviour then, for v3.4.2 at least?
Thanks,
Andy
Spamhaus SBL-CSS.
Is that expected?
I guess I can allowlist from SPF as the envelope sender will be the
mailing list in question (linux-lvm-boun...@redhat.com) and it did
get a "SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record" so redhat.com must
have mimecast's relays correctly in it.
Thanks,
Andy
h all manner of
addresses and the supplier also hosts mailing lists that are open to
the public so I cannot predict any from address for allowlisting
purposes.
I expect they will be delisted by the time I work this out, but it
would be good to know for the future!
Thanks,
Andy
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:14:45PM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > > # test for empty src="" or empty href=""
> > > rawbody __HREF_E
nd it
matched quite a lot of previously not found spam, but did also match
on every auto response from one of my suppliers. It seems after
every customer service interaction they send a "how did we do? fill
in this survey" email from qualtrics.com which contains:
It wouldn&#
3 | 85.119.80.0/21 | GB |
ripencc | 2010-03-03"
So perhaps another plugin along the lines of Plugin::ASN could be
used to get some of that info?
Cymru database docs at:
https://team-cymru.com/community-services/ip-asn-mapping/#dns
Cheers,
Andy
endGrid as
then it would become more feasible to block them entirely. They
currently "provide legitimacy" only on the basis of them being "too
big to block"; I am not sure if that is something to be encouraged
by throwing them more business.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
X-ASN =~ /\b48031\b/
score LOCAL_SPAMMY_ASN_XSERVER5.0
describeLOCAL_SPAMMY_ASN_XSERVERToo much spam from xserver.ua (AS48031)
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
e SendGrid would do
to prevent their other customers sending out phishing emails in
their name.
Cheers,
Andy
On 5/27/19 8:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.05.19 um 02:38 schrieb Andy Howell:
On 5/27/19 6:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.05.19 um 01:05 schrieb Andy Howell:
How do I get spamassassin to honor the setting of bayes_path in
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf ? bayes_path
/var/spool/postfix
On 5/27/19 6:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.05.19 um 01:05 schrieb Andy Howell:
How do I get spamassassin to honor the setting of bayes_path in
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf ? bayes_path
/var/spool/postfix/spamassassin/bayes_db It never gets used. I can
get sa-learn to create the files
age:
bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O: /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
I am using:
postfix 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.2
amavisd-new 1:2.11.0-1ubuntu1.1
spamassassin 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
Thanks,
Andy
f
set.
I've never developed a plugin before but if that approach is
acceptable then I can look into doing it.
Cheers,
Andy
This has literally just come through to me, zero BAYES and got passed my
custom rule as the HREF URL has changed:
https://pastebin.com/pBfhXd6B
thanks, Andy.
On 19-06-2018 17:33, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Well you are welcome to send me new Spamples to look at. As I noted, I've
Hi Kevin,
I'm not really getting any joy with the RBLs. I have, for example, a
sample from the 14th and, taking away my custom rule, Bayes and KAM
scores, the default score would be "0" :(
Content here: https://pastebin.com/dthDn8yb
thanks, Andy.
On 19-06-2018 17:12, K
Hi Kevin,
No I wasn't. I just added it, I get a lot of errors like "meta test
KAM_WARRANTY3 has dependency 'CBJ_GiveMeABreak' with a zero score", is
this normal?
Testing despite these errors the only rule I'm getting a hit on from KAM
is JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL_ALL
th
F
My question is does anyone have any ideas/tips/rules for catching these.
I've created a custom rule that checks for the subject and HREF, but
ever time a new variant comes out I'll have to update this. Anyone got
any better solutions?
thanks in advance, Andy.
Shanew,
Checked my logs and modifcation time on the local.cf. I had restarted
it. I initially had a single 7 in there, but that was not working so I
added all 4.
Thanks,
Andy
On 01/18/2018 02:24 PM, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
> Most likely you've forgotten to restart spamd or maybe
gives confidence level above 50%
* [cf: 100] * 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2
(http://razor.sf.net/
* 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
X-Spam-Bayes: bayes=0.7650, N=176(88-0+3), ham=(), spam=(shark, Pill, craze)
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
Andy
in. Not sure if this behaviour is typical in
other SMTP servers.
Thanks also RW for the tips about "-D" and envelope_sender_header
documentation. Noted for future reference!
many thanks, Andy.
by Exim), so if I'm going to
convince them to do more modifications I'd prefer to know what I was
talking about,
thanks, Andy.
t one gets included together with the (correct) answer from
origin6.asn.cymru.com.
What is the correct way of configuring this? Doesn't the plugin need
two different asn_lookup directives, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6,
with only the relevant queries being directed at each?
Cheers,
Andy
isunderstood the question
> ==John ff
> On 3 Jun 2016, at 17:23, Andy Balholm <mailto:a...@balholm.com>> wrote:
> Where is your mail server hosted. URIBL blocks queries from some cloud
> providers (including DigitalOcean) unless you have a subscription. For a
> while I h
I was using unbound as a local resolver. All queries were going to 127.0.0.1,
and there was no forwarding set up.
Andy
Where is your mail server hosted. URIBL blocks queries from some cloud
providers (including DigitalOcean) unless you have a subscription. For a while
I had a mail server hosted on DO, and I was paying more for my URIBL
subscription than for my hosting.
Andy
-milter project member takes an interest,
changes can be merged back into the official CVS repository.
Andy
Yes, I eventually discovered -a in the help text. But it’s not in the man page.
I sent a mail to the spamass-milt mailing list (and the maintainers) first, and
got no response. It was the first post to that list since September 2014.
Andy
were being maintained, I would just
file a bug or submit a patch. But looking at the condition of the issue
trackers, I don’t think that would do any good.
Andy
Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt
Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22.
Andy
> ...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates
What do you mean?
Andy
, and trying to maintain it there. Is
anyone else here interested in seeing that happen? Or do you have other ideas
about what should be done?
Andy
ers
>
That would be a nice feature for development if it is absolutely not
possible (gut feeling not). In addition to URIBL checks, it would be
useful to do a reverse DNS on the from address domain name and run it
through any preferred DNSBL.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ram
&g
Sheesh. Sorry to offend. As far as it goes, I'm a leech for using Spam
Assassin right now as it is.
Ok I can see my welcome is over here. I'm outta here. Thanks everyone (else).
On Mon, August 11, 2014 7:00 am, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
&g
7;m sounding like a leech, that's because in this case I would very
much like to be. :o)
Andy
On Mon, August 11, 2014 6:35 am, Axb wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 03:23 PM, Andy wrote:
>
>> ok so if i understand things the only way that is feasible for any
>> person/business t
:34:34 -0700
> Andy wrote:
>
>
>> I've copied a few of your responses (without including any names) and
>> sent them to support at lunarpages. And maybe it's due to that that after
>> six+ months of battling with them, I now get this from their support.
>
now I guess they've thrown the problem back to me.
As I've mentioned before I really dont have the time or desire to learn
what it takes to tweak Spam Assassin.
Is there any sort of file online that I can download and use, one that
might be more up to date to deal with current spam tricks?
Andy
On Sun, August 10, 2014 9:08 am, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> Maintaining an effective spam filter is a lot of work. If LunarPages
> does not specialize in that (or at least have a group who specializes in
> it) it's almost certainly not cost-effective for them to bother. It's
> much cheaper to outs
ng to do so.
On Sun, August 10, 2014 7:53 am, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Andy wrote:
>
>
>> And then here is the response I received from Lunarpages
>>
>
> {snip}
>
>
>> it's pretty clear that we have no control over such issues and apart
've heard from them about
"harvestable email" any number of times already) and get the gist of it.
The second paragraph in particular offers their policy in regards to the
management of Spam Assassin.
-
Hello Andy,
Thank you for your update in this case. I have reviewed your f
I think my best option at this point is to just
go back to the "old" way of using my own client software on my computer.
And find one with a strong filter of its own. Anyone have any good results
with Firefox Thunderbird?
Andy
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> (1) putting that many domains on a single host is just begging for that host
> to have a catastrophic failure (as opposed to putting that many domains on a
> local (re)director which servers as a proxy, a la mod_proxy_html mode…)
Judgi
On Thu, August 7, 2014 9:38 am, Andy Balholm wrote:
> Looking at Lunarpages pricing page, it looks like shell access is a $2.00
> per month add-on. Since you dont know what it is, I expect you didnt
> think it was worth paying extra for it, so you probably dont have it.
i wouldnt kno
This particular spammer just re-did the format of their emails, probably to get
around the rules that we’re working on. Do they read the spamassassin-users
list? (I can tell it’s the same spammer, since the return address in Dundrum,
Ireland, is the same as some of the earlier ones, and the styl
On Aug 7, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Andy wrote:
> I have no idea whether I have shell access. I don't even know what that
> is. Sorry.
Shell access means being able to log into their server and get a command
prompt, so that you can do configuration that isn’t supported by their con
h anyway. Maybe it will push them into doing
something.
Andy
On Thu, August 7, 2014 9:24 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/7/2014 12:05 PM, Andy wrote:
>
>> As requested, here are 5 long headers, just taken at random. I can
>> provide more if needed.
>>
>> http://pasteb
n the matter. As I say, I have not seen any
false deletions of legitimate emails except when Lunarpages was sending me
sample spam, or their replies had sample headers in them.
Andy
- equal to or
greater per day than what is getting called "spam".
I would appreciate any insights anyone can offer to me, or for that matter
to Lunarpages because I'm not clear that even they understand what is
going on, nor how to fix this very nagging problem.
Sincerely,
Andy
On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Axb wrote:
> Suggest you use a local DNS resolver instead of some third party which is
> getting in your way.
Good idea. I installed unbound, and configured it to not use Google’s
nameservers (which were the ones that were blocked). Now uribl seems to be
working.
On Aug 6, 2014, at 12:00 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> Can some fresh samples be posted to pastebin?
http://pastebin.com/DWiTYmPN is my complete collection of 24 spams with this
pattern received this week. Collect them all!
On Aug 5, 2014, at 11:16 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> It can hit on embedded phone numbers, which are, strictly speaking, valid
> hexadecimal strings...
> I suspect it's hitting on all those dates as well, and needs some more
> tightening.
In the spams I’m looking at, all the hex strings are 32 c
On Aug 5, 2014, at 10:48 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> Unfortunately the masscheck pages' links to SVN got broken in the recent
> rebuild.
>
> That rule lives here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?view=log
>
> It should be part of th
On Aug 5, 2014, at 10:31 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> There's already a rule for this sort of thing in the sandbox.
>
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20140804-r1615505-n/HEXHASH_WORD/detail
How do I find the actual rule that the page is about?
On Aug 5, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> Saw the following SPAM:
>
> http://pastebin.com/eLm1iRpN
That’s the same group of spams that I just posted a rule for, but I’m looking
at the repeated numbers in the last paragraph.
The last few days, I’ve been getting a lot of spams that have a similar
pattern. They are plain-text messages, and each one ends with a paragraph from
a restaurant review (apparently to confuse bayesian filters), with some numbers
inserted. There is an 8-digit decimal number and a 32-digit hex o
to try and catch
them?
They don't really hit on any rules
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0-rc5
Thanks
Andy
Amir Caspi wrote on 01/30/2014 11:39:51 AM:
> From: Amir Caspi
> To: "Kevin A. McGrail" ,
> Cc: Andy Jezierski ,
> "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
> Date: 01/30/2014 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Help with a regex to catch spam with gibberish html tags
>
Amir Caspi wrote on 01/29/2014 11:08:18 AM:
> From: Amir Caspi
> To: Andy Jezierski ,
> Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
> Date: 01/29/2014 11:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Help with a regex to catch spam with gibberish html tags
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:53 AM, &q
John Hardin wrote on 01/29/2014 12:34:29 PM:
> From: John Hardin
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
> Date: 01/29/2014 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Help with a regex to catch spam with gibberish html tags
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Joe Quinn wrote:
>
> > On 1/29/20
I've been noticing a lot of spam getting through with the same traits, a
bunch of random words within brackets. They all seem to come after the
or the tag. Anyone much more knowledgeable than me care
to assist with a rule to detect them?
Thanks
Andy
Example:
Must have had a brain fart, I could have sworn I've done it that way for
years.
Thanks
Andy
From: Mark Martinec
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 10:17 AM
Subject:Re: sa-learn error
> $ sa-learn --help
> -f file Read list of files/direc
That contains the mailbox file with about 30 spam messages I'm trying to
learn.
Andy
From: Mark Martinec
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 10:02 AM
Subject:Re: sa-learn error
> Inkove it the same as I've done for years:
> sa-learn -
Mark Martinec wrote on 01/20/2014 09:20:51 PM:
> From: Mark Martinec
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
> Date: 01/20/2014 09:21 PM
> Subject: Re: sa-learn error
>
> Andy Jezierski wrote:
> > Tried doing an sa-learn on some spam messages that didn't get fl
age(s) examined)
Is this something new the spammers are doing to try and beat bayes?
Thanks
Andy
t; 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 16481050 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 05690858 0 non-token data: nham
>
>
> bayes_token_ttl 864000
> bayes_seen_ttl 2d
>
>
>
>
Are there any instructions in setting up the Bayes DB using a Redis
server?
I've installed the server, took the sample config options and added them
to local.cf
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::Redis
bayes_store_module_additional Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::TinyRedis
bayes_sql_
> --
> Best regards,
> Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
> [attachment "attyxplb.dat" deleted by Andy Jezierski/Stepan/US]
Your message scored a 7.1 on my system. All the same rules hit except I
don't use AWL which subtracted 2.1 on your system. I
perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm
line 579.
FreeBSD 8.2
perl 5.14.2_2
SA 3.3.2_6
Any ideas?
Thanks
Andy
Started happening a month or so ago. Every now and then out of the blue
I'll get the following error:
spamd[61494]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/spamd/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
This causes scans to take 40-60 seconds to complete as they seem to wait
t
one post on the 27th and this post.
Last post on the 26th was about 4:30CDT.
Andy
; I have uploaded a test port for anyone who wants to try it.
> http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa332_unofficial.tgz
>
Running fine on FreeBSD 8.2 i386 Perl 5.10.1
Andy
be used. I know a lot of them have been merged into SA
and some are outdated and recommended not to be used.
Thanks
Andy
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-06-12 15:20, Andy Dills wrote:
> > 300,000 queries per day...per server? per CIDR? What is the delimiter?
> >
> > Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per day.
>
> That is pro
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 00:19 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > The most important argument for me to keep it enabled by default is
> > > simple. Small organizations and
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 10:42 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> > score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0
> > score URIBL_DBL_ERROR 0
> > score RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
> >
> > I think those are the only queries that generate lookups against Sp
y have the right to charge for their data, but I question whether it's
appropriate for an open-source project to generate sales leads in this
manner.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
ad';
$sysret = system("$update");
if (!$sysret) {
print "New rules!\n";
$compret = system("$compile");
if (!$compret) {
print "Compiled Correctly!\n";
system("$amavis");
}
}
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
addresses? I know Postfix is very flexible in that regard. No clue about
Exchange.
Good luck.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
spheric scores.
So even if we can decide an email is spam before the DATA stage, it makes no
difference since we have to store the thing for a while anyway in case the user
wants to look for something caught that shouldn't be.
Cheers,
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
rries if this group can not find a pattern to check for. Sometimes the
ONLY way to catch a spam is to deal with it based on the MTA sender characteristics.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
|ass(?:es|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|whip(?:ping|ped)?|spank(?:ing|ed)?)?|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|rap(?:e|ed|ing)+)\b/i
describe FS_TEEN_BAD Subject says something bad about girls or boys
##} FS_TEEN_BAD
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
s|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|whip(?:ing|ped)?|spank(?:ing|ed)?)?|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|rap(?:e|ed|ing)+)\b/i
describe FS_TEEN_BAD Subject says something bad about teens, girls, boys, others
##} FS_TEEN_BAD
Thank you again.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
quot; and
cover as many variations as I could think of. :-)
As written above, this still triggers on the original email that set off this
quest. And I think with the most recent changes it will be very unlikely to FPs.
But those could always be "famous last words".
Did I
e in
72_active.cf that detects this. That's all Andy was talking about.
There's an existing rule and he proposed an update that would make it
more effective to do *what it is already designed to do*
Exactly. I should have started with that point. I apologize for starting off
on a tangent w
BUZZHOST_STINGER wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:39 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 29-May-2009, at 07:32, Andy Dorman wrote:
1. I could not find out WHY our IPs (we have a block of 32 for the
cluster of servers that my email was being sent from) were being
listed
I do have to add this would be
is at all typical of this community, that will be useful
time-saving information for us indeed.
Bob, I can not speak for anyone else, but rest assured his juvenile response did
NOT represent me.
Cheers,
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
place). But happy
about it none the less.
However, I do still feel it is a little self-serving to block someone and then
"offer" to unblock them for money.
Thank you Neil for pointing out what I missed.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
ts. And NOBODY wins when it gets to that point.
Just wanted you to have ALL the facts when considering emailreg.org.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
ried without success:
mimeheader NAMELESSGIF_ATTACHMENT Content-Type =~ /image\/gif;\n[^a-z]+name=""/
But this seems to work:
mimeheader NAMELESSGIF_ATTACHMENT Content-Type =~
/image\/gif;\s*(\n\s+)?name=""/
Whadya think?
Thx,
Andy.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Has anyone else noticed an increase in bot spam? My black list has grown
by about 1/3 in the last month.
We have seen an increase of over 50% in spam volume this month. A lot of it
does seem to be coming from bots.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com
ived: from rbn1s-216-180-93-118.adsl.hiwaay.net
(rbn1s-216-180-93-118.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.93.118]) by mail.homefreemail.com
(Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:03:43 -0600
Message-ID: <20090123160343.74244lrgx7cvq...@mail.homefreemail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:03:43
Botnet to do is recognize that this is an HTTP transaction,
not smtp, and hence not hit on it.
We were first wondering if anyone else has encountered this issue and possibly
there is a fix we are not aware of?
Otherwise, we would be willing to give a shot at a patch to handle this issue.
J
nbetween somehow...
Thanks,
Andy.
--
No matter how long or how hard you shop for an item,
after you've bought it, it will be on sale somewhere cheaper.
gree with Karsten (or Guenther?) that we shouldn't raise the
score. But my problem is that I cannot explain to all of my users how
to setup a filter for this SA-tag in their MUA or in smartsieve. They
either can't or don't want to know such deeply technical things. :-(
Thx,
Andy.
t's a good idea or not.
How is your experience with vbounce? Is it safe enough?
(the ML archives don't show too many complaints...)
Anyone out there who raised the score of ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE
and did not drown in user complaints? :-)
Thanks,
Andy.
--
There are so many ways to descri
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
