On 13/04/2024 03:20, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist
entries in the official
I'm good with that, so long as likes of google are not in any whitelist
either.
I haven't been following all the anti spam stuff as much as I used to (I
have peop
On 20240412 16:14:44, Greg Troxel wrote:
jdow writes:
One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where
my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself
to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus
perfect rule set.
spam is bulk and
jdow writes:
> One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where
> my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself
> to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus
> perfect rule set.
spam is bulk and unsolicited. So yes the same messa
On 20240412 15:56:15, Greg Troxel wrote:
I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
Bill Cole writes:
1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
need the support of a corroborating would-be receiver.
Agreed. Or maybe we take requests to add only from
Also, I'm not sure you said this, but I would say:
default whitelist is dkim only
This means
All existing entries are converted to dkim as well as we can, not
worrying if they break. We'll prune ones that don't work as dkim,
and add a signing domain as we figure it out, as
I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
Bill Cole writes:
> 1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
> need the support of a corroborating would-be receiver.
Agreed. Or maybe we take requests to add only from receivers.
> 2. If senders have FPs on objec
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 5:51 PM, Darrell Budic wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
>> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
>> is rumored to have said:
>>
On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM
On 2024-04-12 at 02:14:59 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:14:59 +0200)
Pierluigi Frullani
is rumored to have said:
Hello all,
do you know if there is a way to have a blacklist, either for user
or
eventually for an entire server, that could be feeded via some scripts
?
If you enable the AWL
On 4/12/2024 1:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist entries in
the official SpamAssassin rules for '*@*.microsoft.com' are inappropriate. Note
that there is an entry for '*@accountprotection.microsoft.com' which is still
justified as far a
The de-welcomelisting of MS marketing raises the question: Why do we maintain a
"default" welcomelist?
Based on the documentation, the original purpose of the def_welcomelist* (then
whitelist) feature set was to give a set of senders of purely legitimate mail
from FPs, with a listing having red
Yesterday I received marketing spam from "Microsoft
" advertising something apparently called
"Microsoft Build" which is either a website or a marketing event: IDGAF. Spam
was sent via Marketo, which I gather is now part of the sewer we call Adobe. It
was absolutely authentic. Fully authentic M
On 12.04.24 10:50, natan wrote:
I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin:
In local.cf I disable check like:
...
dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org
But in mail.log I fund still checkin
Hi
I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin:
In local.cf I disable check like:
...
dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org
...
But in mail.log I fund still checking RCVD_IN_PBL, URIBL_CSS_A,
> do you know if there is a way to have a blacklist, either for user or
> eventually for an entire server, that could be feeded via some scripts ?
Yes create your own dns blacklist
> A sort of auto_learn but only for addresses ( to or from ) ?
No such thing as only for... You have to impleme
14 matches
Mail list logo
