On 20240412 16:14:44, Greg Troxel wrote:
jdow<j...@earthlink.net> writes:One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus perfect rule set.spam is bulk and unsolicited. So yes the same message could be either, but if a sender spams anyone, they are spammer, even if they send mail that isn't spam.
Ah, no, that way leads to disaster. Some people resign from lists by declaring the sender spam. That could end up cutting access to all the people who want the emails. (At various times this list and most 'ix lists were unusually difficult to resign from. And, yes, I have been around that long. I'm just too politically incorrect for most lists these days, {^_-}) It is wise to be careful about how soon you pull the "spammer" trigger. YMMV and YAMV (Attitude).
{^_^}
