jdow <j...@earthlink.net> writes: > One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where > my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself > to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus > perfect rule set.
spam is bulk and unsolicited. So yes the same message could be either, but if a sender spams anyone, they are spammer, even if they send mail that isn't spam.
