Webmaster DKDB skrev den 2013-10-24 07:56:
X-Mailer: GroupWise 2012
mangler dkdb.dk spænding i livet ?
hvis du ønsker at framelde denne mailliste så skal du ikke skrive til
den, men skrive til manageren som kan findes på
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
[removed
>>> 24-10-2013 kl. 07:39 skrev i
>>> meddelelsen
UID6893-1321632709:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
> To confirm that you would like
>
>webmas...@dkdb.dk
>
> removed from the users mailing list, please send a short reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbAh3O0g90Q :-)
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> > Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
> > URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
>
--On Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:05 AM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 23:51:
Is Amavis screwing with
things here, since SA is called via Amavis?
if its is, try testing spampd so its showed its not that problem, running
amavis and spampd nearly is equa
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 23:56:
Yes, I see... Amavis turns off RBLs:
$spamassasin_obj = Mail::SpamAssassin->new(
{ dont_copy_prefs => 1, local_tests_only => 1 } )
That explains a lot. ;)
damm this happends only on precompiled problems distros like zimbra
i cant get th
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 23:51:
Is Amavis screwing with
things here, since SA is called via Amavis?
if its is, try testing spampd so its showed its not that problem,
running amavis and spampd nearly is equal to postfix setup, not much
time to see if amavis is at fault for this
Axb skrev den 2013-10-23 23:47:
If ppl setup their reports not to show rule descriptions do we
need to read them every description out loud?
the more users that setup there dns servers to not forward, the more
datafeeds paying users is needed to handle the dns load
:)
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:56 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
Now, why don't I have "URIBL_BLOCKED" in *both*? It still seems to me
that URIBL lookups are not occurring when going through the MTA,
regardless of whether or not I'm blocked. Is Amavis screwing with things
here, sinc
John Hardin skrev den 2013-10-23 23:40:
Maybe we need to rename that to URIBL_QUERY_BLOCKED for clarity?
+1
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:51 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
Now, why don't I have "URIBL_BLOCKED" in *both*? It still seems to me
that URIBL lookups are not occurring when going through the MTA,
regardless of whether or not I'm blocked. Is Amavis screwing with things
here, sin
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:32 PM +0200 Axb
wrote:
URIBL_BLOCKED is not good news .-)
I wouldn't touch that score...
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
Ok.
Here is something I don't understand -- Why I get utterly different values
from email that goes t
On 10/23/2013 11:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
URIBL_BLOCKED is not good news .-)
I wouldn't touch
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
URIBL_BLOCKED is not good news .-)
I wouldn't touch that score...
Maybe we need to rename that
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 21:50 -0500, David B Funk wrote:
> Actually that %thingy is the IPv6 zone_id (which functionally maps to the
> interface).
Good point, thanks. And appropriately named article link.
> Given that the LLA is the same bit range regardless of interface, on a
> multi-homed machi
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 23:23:
Oct 23 14:18:43.636 [24474] dbg: uridnsbl: domain "pumpery.com" listed
(URIBL_BLOCKED): 127.0.0.1
this is not a url blacklistning, but a warning wmware dns is not paying
for dataservices
i wont say localhost one more time now, you get the poin
On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:04 PM -0400 Kris Deugau
wrote:
Well, you didn't post the message body...
*Usually* that indicates that the URI wasn't listed when the message was
originally processed, but checking again even 10-15 minutes
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
URIBL_BLOCKED means the DNS server you're using to query the DNSBL has
exceeded the free access limits and is being blocked from getti
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:04 PM -0400 Kris Deugau
wrote:
Well, you didn't post the message body...
*Usually* that indicates that the URI wasn't listed when the message was
originally processed, but checking again even 10-15 minutes later it is.
This is tricky to confirm unless you
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:52 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 22:09:
Ok, but the message body specifically has multiple links to
pumpery.com. So why didn't it get scored? That's what I don't
understand. ;)
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=7.1 re
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:57 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 22:45:
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Checking:
4vlUublDBL_R [162.213.112.166] ->
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Passed CLEAN
{RelayedInb
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:58 PM -0400 Kris Deugau
> wrote:
>
>> Only select headers have URIs extracted and passed to the DNS lookups;
>> I don't *think* Received: or Message-Id: are included. I've been
>> surprised now and then discovering a URI that *was*
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 22:45:
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Checking:
4vlUublDBL_R [162.213.112.166] ->
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Passed CLEAN
{RelayedInbound}, [162.213.112.166]:49611 [162.213.112.166]
-> , Queue-ID: A39DD79F,
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 22:09:
Ok, but the message body specifically has multiple links to
pumpery.com. So why didn't it get scored? That's what I don't
understand. ;)
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=7.1 required=10.0
tests=SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SUR
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:34 PM +0200 Axb
wrote:
pls grep your logs for one of these: URIBL , SURBL , DBL (uppercase)
Do you see any hits at all?
I see one:
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Checking: 4vlUublDBL_R
[162.213.112.166] ->
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-
On 10/23/2013 10:09 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
if you have own bind9 running on localhost
bind9 is not installed on localhost.
so resolv.conf is forwarding in wild ? :(
resolve.conf uses VMWare's DNS servers which a
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
if you have own bind9 running on localhost
bind9 is not installed on localhost.
so resolv.conf is forwarding in wild ? :(
resolve.conf uses VMWare's DNS servers which are not located on the MX
servers.
--Quanah
--
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:58 PM -0400 Kris Deugau
wrote:
Only select headers have URIs extracted and passed to the DNS lookups;
I don't *think* Received: or Message-Id: are included. I've been
surprised now and then discovering a URI that *was* extracted from a
header. Otherwise all
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 21:30:
50_scores.cf:score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0 1.7 0 1.7
meta URIBL_DBL_SPAM (0.001) (0) (0.001) (0)
that will show if you get results or not if hits
but dont use it in production only on testing
if you have own bind9 running on localhost
bind9 is not
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 03:05:
No, it was literally a bug in the early postfix 2.10 development
releases. I reported it back to Wietse a few years ago, but never
fixed my config. ;)
yes i remember it now, one should show diff in ifconfig vs postconf -d |
grep mynetwork
:-)
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:00 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
> wrote:
>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 19:37:
>>
pumpery.com listed on black.uribl.com
pumpery.com listed on jp.surbl.org
pumpery.com listed on sc.surbl.org
>>>
--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:00 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 19:37:
pumpery.com listed on black.uribl.com
pumpery.com listed on jp.surbl.org
pumpery.com listed on sc.surbl.org
pumpery.com listed on dbl.spamhaus.org
this i
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-10-23 19:37:
pumpery.com listed on black.uribl.com
pumpery.com listed on jp.surbl.org
pumpery.com listed on sc.surbl.org
pumpery.com listed on dbl.spamhaus.org
this is urlbl, nothing to do with trusted_networks
So, how do I determine why
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:09 PM +0200 Axb
wrote:
sent reply directly, sotrry - here's for the list
On 10/22/2013 10:33 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I don't get the concern about VMW. The vmw hosts are *my* MTAs and in
mynetworks.
mail.zimbra.com -> load balanced name for edge01-z
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Warren [mailto:da...@hireahit.com]
> Sent: 23. oktober 2013 09:51
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Shared bayes SQL between machines
>
> On 2013-10-22 07:52, Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:
> > Mmm well I'd like to use it, but it's also the ma
On 2013-10-22 07:52, Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:
Mmm well I'd like to use it, but it's also the manual learning.
We use a web frontend which lists quarantined messages and both users and
myself do manual training from there (it just calls sa-learn)
How do you distribute load among your SpamAss
36 matches
Mail list logo
