On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> > Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
> > URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
>
> URIBL_BLOCKED is not good news .-)
> I wouldn't touch that score...
Maybe we need to rename that to URIBL_QUERY_BLOCKED for clarity?
We have:
describe URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists\#dnsbl-block
for more information.
If ppl setup their reports not to show rule descriptions.... do we need to
read them every description out loud?
[cynicism]Sometimes, yes.[/cynicism]
To be fair, few people include the hit descriptions for ham.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Users mistake widespread adoption of Microsoft Office for the
development of a document format standard.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
510 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
