--On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:34 PM +0200 Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
pls grep your logs for one of these: URIBL , SURBL , DBL (uppercase)
Do you see any hits at all?
I see one:
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Checking: 4vlUublDBL_R
[162.213.112.166] <x...@in.telligent.com> -> <x...@zimbra.com>
Oct 23 09:05:53 edge01-zcs amavis[3250]: (03250-12) Passed CLEAN
{RelayedInbound}, [162.213.112.166]:49611 [162.213.112.166]
<x...@in.telligent.com> -> <x...@zimbra.com>, Queue-ID: A39DD79F, Message-ID:
<dalopszfsp1j106zppp00001...@dalops.corp.telligent.com>, mail_id:
4vlUublDBL_R, Hits: -97.305, size: 7199, queued_as: 7ACA71295, 484 ms
It is BCP to use a local resolver under your control for mail servers.
Due to hammering public mirrors, an ISP/ASP's shared resolver may be
tarpitted or blocked from doing queries to the BLs.
If you run your own, you know when and what is happening and makes it
easier to troubleshoot /monitor any potential issues.
Yeah, it's on my to-do list to add local dnscaching software to the Zimbra
product. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration