May I point out, that while you may find the language crude -- it isn't
language that would violate FTC standards in that in used any of the
7 or so 'unmentionable words'...
People -- these standards of 'crude language' really need to be strongly
held 'in check' -- the US is 'supposed' to be th
* Linda Walsh :
> It's an American thing. Things that are normal speech for UK blokes, get
> Americans all disturbed.
Sloppy language is sloppy language everywhere! I took offense in the message,
too and I am neither American nor am I from the UK.
But what annoys me the most is that the comments
It's an American thing. Things that are normal speech for UK blokes, get
Americans all disturbed.
Funny, used to be the other way around...but well...times change.
Justin Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:32,
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Imagine what Barracuda Networks could do with
Hello,
Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
header of mail?
Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via
SMTP * 2.2 HIDE_WIN_STATUS RAW: Javascript to hide URLs in browser * 1.3
MIS
From: "poifgh"
Sent: Friday, 2009/July/31 19:47
I am sorry, I did not provide any statistics of the machine involved.
CPU - 8 cores with each core 2327 MHz
RAM - 16GB
Afair its has 7200RPM disk - 2TB.
One disk you might consider a striped array to get disk speed.
50 megabytes per second
From: "LuKreme"
Sent: Friday, 2009/July/31 12:37
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:33 PM, jdow wrote:
Given that profanity is the effort of a small mind to express itself
I have a feeling he's going to receive his third and final warning any
time now, Matt
Given that nothing that richard said is not an
From: "LuKreme"
Sent: Friday, 2009/July/31 12:30
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:25 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
... dropping in here and making jokes at such low hanging fruit.
Make all the jokes at Barracuda's expense that you like, complain
about th
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 17:37 -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> LuKreme said the following on 7/31/09 3:27 PM:
> >> Richard -- please watch your language. This is a public mailing
> >> list, and offensive language here is inappropriate.
> >
> > I dunno, 'gay' isn't that offensive.
> >
> >
>
> Gay is *not
I havent tried with sa-compile yet - I can give it a shot
--
Henrik K wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:41:47AM -0700, poifgh wrote:
>>
>> Henrik K wrote:
>> >
>> > Yeah, given that my 4x3Ghz box masscheck peaks at 22 msgs/sec, without
>> > Net/AWL/Bayes. But that's the 3.3 SVN ruleset..
I am sorry, I did not provide any statistics of the machine involved.
CPU - 8 cores with each core 2327 MHz
RAM - 16GB
Afair its has 7200RPM disk - 2TB.
Yes, people were right in indicating AWL could be the problem. turning off
AWL results in near linear scaling of SA as we increase number of pro
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:41:47AM -0700, poifgh wrote:
>
> Henrik K wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, given that my 4x3Ghz box masscheck peaks at 22 msgs/sec, without
> > Net/AWL/Bayes. But that's the 3.3 SVN ruleset.. wonder what version was
> > used
> > and any nondefault rules/settings? Certainly sounds st
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> email me off list as I've just been
> banned for upsetting a sponsor LOL
>
Richard, this has nothing to do with Barracuda. They have no influence
over my opinions whatsoever. I don't work for Apache or Barracuda, or
any company sponsored by either.Neither Apac
LuKreme said the following on 7/31/09 3:27 PM:
>> Richard -- please watch your language. This is a public mailing
>> list, and offensive language here is inappropriate.
>
> I dunno, 'gay' isn't that offensive.
>
>
Gay is *not* a synonym for stupid.
I do take offense to the term being used in th
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:59 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> I have set up spamassassin to run as a damon and run as the user spamd
> instead of root.
> When I run ps xafu | grep spamd I get this output:
> root 2389 0.0 2.5 29288 26852 ?Ss 17:15 0:02
> /usr/sbin/spamd
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Nathan M wrote:
Here's an example of what we're seeing within the message source.
creatures quickly produce approve crevice nuclear moping
esoteric pernicious motion faith does embodies does
purify testament maximum exceeding centralism intellect prey
tidying welcomed tra
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:37, LuKreme wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:33 PM, jdow wrote:
>>
>> Given that profanity is the effort of a small mind to express itself
>> I have a feeling he's going to receive his third and final warning any
>> time now, Matt
>
> Given that nothing that richard said is
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:33 PM, jdow wrote:
Given that profanity is the effort of a small mind to express itself
I have a feeling he's going to receive his third and final warning any
time now, Matt
Given that nothing that richard said is not anything I've heard on,
say, prime time TV or... a co
From: "Matt Kettler"
Sent: Friday, 2009/July/31 04:26
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:53 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:32,
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
...
Richard -- please watch your language. This is a public mailing
list,
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:25 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
... dropping in here and making jokes at such low hanging fruit.
Make all the jokes at Barracuda's expense that you like, complain
about them all you like, just avoid offensive language.
Rea
On Jul 31, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:32,
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Imagine what Barracuda Networks could do with that if they did not
fill
their gay little boxes with hardware rubbish from the floors of MSI
and
supermicro. Jesus, try and process tha
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:55 AM, poifgh wrote:
I ran freshly build SA with Bayes and DNSBL turned off. Why am I not
seeing
a linear increase in the throughput? Is a file locking creating the
bottleneck? If yes, which particular file is being locked? If no,
what could
be the reason for this?
> In my tests - there was not MTA. The mails/spam were collected from
> some server in mbox format and fed to SA using --mbox switch. The
> size of msgs was not altered in any fashion - just the usual size of
> incoming spam/mails
If you're interested in testing/tuning spamassassin for heavy loads
no. Even if you cannot think properly and use your brain
the people here have brains that function.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "snowweb"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/July/28 04:07
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
1980's style forum. I'm trying
I've gotten a message from realage-privacypolicy.com which looks like
it is a typical corporate html-heavy message. This one is updating me
that their privacy policy has changed. The reason I am suspicious is
that I've received at least 3 others this week that look very similar
from various
OK - I can see what metrics you are trying to ascertain - I think. I'm
not sure that your test and real life are 'right'. For obvious reasons
I don't want to carry this one on via list - I would suggest you ask
Justin and I will be happy to give info on my local setup (this
assumes Justin can grab
Hi
I have set up spamassassin to run as a damon and run as the user spamd
instead of root.
When I run ps xafu | grep spamd I get this output:
root 2892 0.0 0.0 3116 716 pts/0S+ 20:34 0:00
\_ grep spamd
root 2389 0.0 2.5 29288 26852 ?Ss 1
This seems to be a newer tactic, and a lot of email with content
poisoning seems to be slipping through our spam filters. The reason
is all the "legitimate" content between tags. Most email apps
don't show the data between