On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:55:48 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> The default of 0.1. It's a default for a reason. > > But that *really* is not your problem. Your problem is with learning > spam, not learning even more ham. Just as you mentioned in your > original report. See my previous response for a solution. You want to > learn more spam. What he actually wrote was that 3.7% of _all_messages_ were hitting hitting BAYES_00, and 1.7% were hitting BAYES_99. If he actually meant what he wrote and doesn't have an extraordinary spam/ham ratio, then he clearly has a problem with both spam and ham.
