On Friday 06 October 2006 06:45, Chris Santerre wrote:
> IMHO I think its because most of us belive if you have to fetch the spam,
> scan it localy, then you have already lost the battle by having to waste
> resources to get the spam down to your machine.
What a strange attitude for someone on a S
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
> > 0fw: spamassassin.lock
> > spamd -L -c -s 512000
This should be:
spamc -c -s 512000
> Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail
> isn't marked up at all.
>
> My cron entry upon bootup is:
>
> /opt/local/bin/spamd -L
Get rid o
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it installs the
test files (20_anti_ratware.cf and similar) in
/usr/share/spamassassin.
However, sa-update shoves updates into
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org (with extra
crap in
On Thu, October 5, 2006 21:38, John Andersen wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this is going to be a major problem for many many sites.
> Lots of people are running various specialized rules in separate .cf files.
i did:
mv /etc/mail/spamassassin ~/tmp
mkdir -p /etc/mail/spamassassin
sa-update
cp ~/tmp /
I noticed today an unusually high incidence of spam subject lines of "Re:
Hi", and I don't see a rule for this in the distribution. Do others see
this much in legitimate mail? Or could it make a good rule?
Chris wrote:
> > I can't answer your questions, but that -m 16 has me worried.
> > At around
> > 40-60 megs per child, that is using up a LOT of ram. Unless
> > you have a few
> > gigs spare on this machine I'd stick with the default of 5
> > children until
> > you have things up and runn
Good lord, I hope that's not the general solution on solaris 8.
That would produce a result of:
foo.ucsc.edu.ucsc.edu
(as the hostname returned by "hostname" is already fully qualified on
our systems, both because it SHOULD BE, and because MIT kerberos
wants/needs it to be)
or
foo.ucsc.ed
Evan Platt wrote:
> From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd
> > startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran
> > the test under? Different home directory?
> >
> > I'd make a guess at the -L parameter
--On Friday, October 06, 2006 10:37 AM -0500 Bookworm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it installs the test
files (20_anti_ratware.cf and similar) in /usr/share/spamassassin.
However, sa-update shoves updates into
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/upda
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> I changed my procmailrc to;
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> | spamd -L -c -s 512000
Shouldn't that be spamc?
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: Re: 2 different scores?
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 01:11:50 -0700
The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd
startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran
the test under? Different home directory?
Thanks!
I actually got this to fix it as well:
open HOSTNAME, "<", "/etc/hostname.hme0" or warn;
open DOMAINNAME, "<", "/etc/defaultdomain" or warn;
my $tmp = . '.' . ;
-john
At 2:17 PM -0400 10/6/06, Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> I would like to change the scores on the following.
> Could you tell me what file they are located in or how to
> modify the score?
>
> Thank you
>
> HOST_EQ_DSL HOST_EQ_DSL_
> HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D
> HOST_EQ_PACBELL_DSL
> HOST_MISMATCH_NET
>
> I am running Redhat enterprise 4 with SpamAssassin 3.1
In Long.pm, go to line 91 and change this
my $tmp = `hostname` . '.' . `domainname`;
to this
my $tmph = `hostname`;
my $tmpd = `domainname`;
my $tmp = "$tmph.$tmpd";
> -Original Message-
> From: John Goubeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Friday, October 06,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:11:24PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Lots of good stuff there, but nothing that specifically references the
> /usr/share/spamassassin vs /var/lib/spamassassin question.
Well, there is, though not directly as a "why local state dir instead of
default rules dir" type quest
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:15:01PM +0200, Thomas Ericsson wrote:
> Net::DNS, restarted SA. URIBL rules starting to hit, jipe! Still
> som eproblems running sa-update though. Seems like i'm missing some
> perl modules:
>
> admin# ./sa-update -D
> Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC
I would like to change the scores on the following.
Could you tell me what file they are located in or how to modify the score?
Thank you
HOST_EQ_DSL HOST_EQ_DSL_
HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D
HOST_EQ_PACBELL_DSL
HOST_MISMATCH_NET
I am running Redhat enterprise 4 with SpamAssassin 3.1.4 with the latest
I am getting the following error generated from spamd, apparently due
to the fact that the sys::hostname::long module behaves differently
on different OSs in this case Solaris 8.
While i realize this is not specific to spmassassin and a perl /OS
issue was wondering if anyone running SA on S
Hello Everyone,
Long time ago, a link to a script names sa3-upgrade.pl was posted at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradeTo300.
The link to the script is currently broken, so it's unavailable.
Does anyone have this script and would like to share with me?
It's time to do away with my 2.64
Just an update on this for reference.
Tried to install the missing IO::Socket::INET6 first, did not pass
tests either, then used the force flag on the DNS module, cpan -if
Net::DNS, restarted SA. URIBL rules starting to hit, jipe! Still
som eproblems running sa-update though. Seems lik
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:44:51AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > I suspect that one or the other behavior is actually wrong.
> > > Either the CPAN method has a bad configuration script, or the
> > > sa-update has never been matched to the configure script.
> >
> > Is t
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:44:51AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > I suspect that one or the other behavior is actually wrong. Either
> > the CPAN method has a bad configuration script, or the sa-update has
> > never been matched to the configure script.
>
> Is this an FAQ yet?
Yes, actually. ht
Hi
Actually, i receive 750 000 mails/days on my server, for best
performance, i have a local Dccd server and now i want
put a local rbl ..
Anyone know what is the best rbl list that i can mirror in local ?
i can put more rbl list on my dns server ?
and do you know if it's possible to create a p
Bookworm wrote:
> When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it installs the
> test files (20_anti_ratware.cf and similar) in
> /usr/share/spamassassin.
>
> However, sa-update shoves updates into
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org (with extra
> crap in /var/lib/spam
Hi Bookworm,
There isn't a problem. This is exactly how it is designed to work.
SA has an inbuilt order of checking for files, RTFM:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/spamassassin.html#configuration
Bookworm wrote:
When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it insta
When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it installs the test
files (20_anti_ratware.cf and similar) in /usr/share/spamassassin.
However, sa-update shoves updates into
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org (with extra crap
in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/ )
I su
Chris Santerre wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Loren Wilton wrote:
> > > > So I started running fetchmail as a cron job from each mail
> > > > server. This seems to work fine. What puzzles me is that I
> > > > never saw this suggested anywhere. Am I missing some obvious
>
Title: RE: Syslog gone?
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:15 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Syslog gone?
>
>
> > /usr/local/bin/spamd -D -x -q -d -m 16 -r
> /var/run/spamd.pid -i 127.0.0.1
Justin Mason wrote:
> Matt Kettler writes:
>
>> What's going on? What magic do I need to make whiteclnt work properly in
>> a SA 3.1.x environment when using dccifd?
>>
>
> er, I think it'd need to be implemented ;)
>
> The whole idea of manually whitelisting all the DCC FPs is anathema to
Title: RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 9:10 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus
>
>
> Loren Wilton wro
I agree with you. I'll turn off this right now. I didn't know this and I
realized I bother spamassassin mailing list for nothing, Sorry guys :-(
Thanks for the answers Anthony and François.
Note : it's stranger that when I use online web XBL checks result is negative
(no match). And now mails
Hi,
François Rousseau wrote:
I don't know MailScanner but maybe because they have found the adress in a
XBL list?
"X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SBL+XBL,"
Yes, MailScanner can be configured to do the RBL lookups itself and to
mark messages on that basis (this is regardless of the S
Hello..
I have operated sendmail + procmail + SA at linux.
and sometimes, it seems that SA doesn't work well.
At that times, I can see so lots of procmail processes.
But after spamd restart, SA works well...
So is there any script or tool to monitor spamd works well or not.
If spamd doesn't wor
I don't know MailScanner but maybe because they have found the adress in a XBL list?"X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SBL+XBL,"
2006/10/6, Fabien GARZIANO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi folks,I'm in trouble with 1 particular mail and in front of a strange problem.I got a mail which my spamassassin s
Loren Wilton wrote:
> > So I started running fetchmail as a cron job from each mail server.
> > This seems to work fine. What puzzles me is that I never saw this
> > suggested anywhere.
> > Am I missing some obvious alternative?
>
> Nope, this is a moderately standard way to do this.
> Fetchmail
Well, I got my syslog back. Apparently, 3.1.6 no longer accepts facility
in the form of "mail.crit" (facility + severity; 2.55 did). But using a
single word facility like "debug" or some such works fine.
Yep. Facility coding scheme changed about three releases back as best I
recall. You might
Hi folks,
I'm in trouble with 1 particular mail and in front of a strange problem.
I got a mail which my spamassassin score 1.5 (the score limit before
spam is identified is 5.2) but it tag it like spam anyway
X-caliseo-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SBL+X
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vrijdag 6 oktober 2006 10:16
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Syslog gone?
>
>
>
Well, I got my syslog back. Apparently, 3.1.6 no longer accepts facility
in the form of "mail.crit" (facility +
When I "test" spamassassin setup by running "spamassassin -D --lint", I
get these complaints about spf:
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo
check
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF check
[6100] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-Fr
Matt Kettler writes:
> I recently have been fighting with making DCC work properly on a SA
> 3.1.x install.
>
> I have several high-volume mailing lists, that repeatedly hit DCC, so I
> did what every good DCC user should do. I added an "ok" for the envelope
> from to my whiteclnt file, make sure
Matt Kettler writes:
> Mark wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm finally upgrading from SpamAssassin 2.55 (tweaked myself, over time)
> > to 3.1.6. I have a few questions regarding this upgrade.
> >
> > In the "old" SA, I had a file called ConfSourceSQL.pm, which did the
> > per-user stuff for MySQL. I c
/usr/local/bin/spamd -D -x -q -d -m 16 -r /var/run/spamd.pid -i 127.0.0.1
-A 127.0.0.1 -u spamd -s mail.crit
I can't answer your questions, but that -m 16 has me worried. At around
40-60 megs per child, that is using up a LOT of ram. Unless you have a few
gigs spare on this machine I'd stick
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0
tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL,INFO_TLD,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.6
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.2 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL,
INFO_TLD,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
URIBL_AB_SURBL,U
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:01:00PM -0400 or thereabouts, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:59:08PM +1300, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice Theo .. I've registered with razor and am
> > now reporting spam regularly and saving to folder 'Spam'.
>
> :)
>
> > However, I
Ok, nearly there. :) I start spamd 3.1.6 as follows:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -D -x -q -d -m 16 -r /var/run/spamd.pid -i 127.0.0.1
-A 127.0.0.1 -u spamd -s mail.crit
I get:
[11581] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[11581] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[11581] dbg: logger: successfully opened
45 matches
Mail list logo
