I agree with you. I'll turn off this right now. I didn't know this and I realized I bother spamassassin mailing list for nothing, Sorry guys :-( Thanks for the answers Anthony and François.
Note : it's stranger that when I use online web XBL checks result is negative (no match). And now mails received from my gateway, from the same user, the same smtp server, are not XBL positive. Strange huh ? > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 6 octobre 2006 15:37 > À : users@spamassassin.apache.org > Objet : Re: Low spam score but marqued as spam > > Hi, > > François Rousseau wrote: > > I don't know MailScanner but maybe because they have found > the adress > > in a XBL list? > > > > "X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SBL+XBL," > > > Yes, MailScanner can be configured to do the RBL lookups > itself and to mark messages on that basis (this is regardless > of the SA score). > > This can be configured on the MailScanner.conf file: > > # If a message appears in at least this number of "Spam > Lists" (as defined # above), then the message will be treated > as spam and so the "Spam # Actions" will happen, unless the > message reaches the levels for "High # Scoring Spam". By > default this is set to 1 to mimic the previous # behaviour, > which means that appearing in any "Spam Lists" will cause # > the message to be treated as spam. > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1 > > > Personally I turn this off and let SA do its scoring. The > MailScanner settings are a little too cut and dried for my > taste. If I was to trust a RBL that much I would use it at > SMTP time anyway. > > > > > > > > > > 2006/10/6, Fabien GARZIANO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I'm in trouble with 1 particular mail and in front of a > strange problem. > >> I got a mail which my spamassassin score 1.5 (the score > limit before > >> spam is identified is 5.2) but it tag it like spam anyway > >> > >> X-caliseo-MailScanner: Found to be clean > >> X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin > >> (score=1.562, requis 5.8, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_90_100 0.02, > >> HTML_FONT_BIG 0.14, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, HTML_NONELEMENT_00_10 0.00, > >> HTML_SHOUTING3 0.02, RCVD_IN_XBL 3.98) > >> X-caliseo-MailScanner-SpamScore: 1 > >> X-caliseo-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> X-Spam-Status: Yes > >> > >> SpamAssassin version 3.0.5 > >> running on Perl version 5.8.6 > >> > >> I can't find anything in the previous mails in here. And > google give > >> nothing. > >> Anyone got an idea ? > >> > >> -- > >> > >> F a b i e n G a r z i a n o > >> > > > > > -- > Anthony Peacock > CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School > WWW: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/ > "If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange > apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But > if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these > ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw >
