On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:11:24PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Lots of good stuff there, but nothing that specifically references the
> /usr/share/spamassassin vs /var/lib/spamassassin question.

Well, there is, though not directly as a "why local state dir instead of
default rules dir" type question.

Usually, this issue comes up when people ask about moving files from
one location to the other, which is covered in the FAQ area:

"After sa-update completes, do I have to move the files somewhere for them to 
be used?"

However, about one versus the other ...  The location used is specified
quite a few times in the "Using sa-update" and "Installed Updates"
sections, and I think it's pretty clear that it's designed that way.  The FAQ
question:

"Should I use "--updatedir" to put updates in the default rules directory (ie:
/usr/share/spamassassin), or the site rules directory (ie:
/etc/mail/spamassassin)?"

also talks about how there are two directories and they do different things.


I think it makes sense, but then again I'm a bit biased about the whole thing.
If someone feels they want to explain things in more detail, please feel free
to update the wiki page (that is, after all, why it's a wiki page... ;))

-- 
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"Having a firewall that allows NFS to the Internet is like having a seat belt
 that lets your head touch the dashboard."       - Marcus Ranum

Attachment: pgp20ZjRVQd06.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to