Hi,
I am using SA 3.0.4. I was wondering if it is possible to turn off the spamcop
reporting plugin without recompiling, and how?
Thanks in advance
Al Franz wrote:
> Your right the WhiteList problem does seem to be Horde. But why would the
> AWL value of gone so high suddenly? Is slowly dropping but still at 19.
> Thanks for your help.
One really high scoring message would do it. (score well above +100.0)
If your admin is using an old ver
Your right the WhiteList problem does seem to be Horde. But why would the
AWL value of gone so high suddenly? Is slowly dropping but still at 19.
Thanks for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL P
Al Franz wrote:
> I don't have root level access to my mail server. The WhiteList I added the
> name to was via the Horde web mail system, but it did not apply any rule or
> negative value to the score for those emails. Only controls to SpamAssassin
> I really have access to is what Cpanel gives
I don't have root level access to my mail server. The WhiteList I added the
name to was via the Horde web mail system, but it did not apply any rule or
negative value to the score for those emails. Only controls to SpamAssassin
I really have access to is what Cpanel gives me. Any ideas would be
Al Franz wrote:
> Have a problem that any email from a certain individual coming from a
> Microsoft MSN mail server is being identified as spam. From the example
> below you can see that 21 points are assigned for AWL rule. What is that,
> the docs mentioned that this should only be 1 point.
No
Have a problem that any email from a certain individual coming from a
Microsoft MSN mail server is being identified as spam. From the example
below you can see that 21 points are assigned for AWL rule. What is that,
the docs mentioned that this should only be 1 point. If I add this person
to the
On 9/13/05 4:27 PM, "Michael Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> spamassassin doesn't look up users prefs in SQL, you can only do SQL
> prefs via spamd.
>
> Michael
Oh, OK. So even though lint doesn't show it, I can rest assured that it's
being applied to real mail? ;)
Thanks!
--
Matth
Matthew Yette wrote:
>My reason for posting is because I put into the database the following row:
>
>User: @GLOBAL
>Preference: required_hits
>Value: 5.1
>
>And then I ran spamassassin -D --lint
>
>However, at the end of the test output, it still compared it to the required
>value of just 5...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
>> If, for example I had an IMAP folder into which I drop spam that
>> my mail server should report on my behalf -then reporting would
>> become far less of
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 17:38 Pedro Sam wrote:
> I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
> "spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC/pyzor/razor all in one go.
Ah, so it's simple. I already have a script which takes from my SPAM_yes
folder and reports as SPAM, and
On 9/13/05 1:48 PM, "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, required_hits can be a user preference. Anything in man
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf other than privileged or administrator settings can
> be
> done as a user preference.
>
> User preferences can be SQL (as you are doing) or in
Matthew Yette wrote:
> Can I set a different required_hits value based on the incoming email
> address/domain via SQL as I can with certain rule point values? Or is it
> referenced in local.cf and that alone?
Yes, required_hits can be a user preference. Anything in man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf ot
Can I set a different required_hits value based on the incoming email
address/domain via SQL as I can with certain rule point values? Or is it
referenced in local.cf and that alone?
Matt
--
Matthew Yette
Senior Engineer (NOC/Operations)
M.A. Polce Consulting
315-838-1644
Hi list members,
This just started showing up in my cgpsa.err file.
I also noticed that during NMAKE test, the SPF test failed.
Anyone have an hint about where to look? CGP 4.3.6. SA 3.0.4 Win 2K
server
Regards,
Marc
---
Pedro Sam wrote:
> I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to
> mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed
> remotely over IMAP
I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
"spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC/pyzor/ra
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Maybe it would be good to report that e-mails to razor, etc. too. I'll
give it a try. Do you have a script to report from IMAP to SA?
I don't... It can't be that hard to do using a polling approach... It
would be neater if this was triggered by the IMAP server... but
Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to
> mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed
> remotely over IMAP
I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
"spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC
At 10:56 AM 9/13/2005, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> AFAIK this isn't all that easy in SA versions under 3.1.
It's actually the same difficulty with 3.0 as with 3.1. Just use a plugin.
(Ok, 3.1 is easier since the plugin already exists ..
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
BTW: is pyzor good / worth the effort? It's latest release is September
7, 2002, for that I thought it wouldn't be used too much anymore. Do
you get enough hits?
On my system, pyzor gets about half as
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> AFAIK this isn't all that easy in SA versions under 3.1.
It's actually the same difficulty with 3.0 as with 3.1. Just use a plugin.
(Ok, 3.1 is easier since the plugin already exists ... But it wouldn't be
hard to write a custom one
At 07:51 AM 9/13/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail server with qmail, qmailscanner, fetchmail, spamassassin,
clamav installed . My linux distribution is debian sarge.
When spamassasin check a mail I notice in the header of the mail the
following:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.2 re
Jeffrey N. Miller wrote:
Go a lot of spam last night with subject lines Re[2] or [4] or [5]
Most are Cialis or sperm pill spam. Also I received one of these emails that
was addressed to another user???
I got about 10 of them waiting for me this morning. All were tagged.
The lowest score out
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 14:10, Jeffrey N. Miller typed:
> Go a lot of spam last night with subject lines Re[2] or [4] or [5]
> Most are Cialis or sperm pill spam. Also I received one of these emails
> that was addressed to another user???
The To: you see displayed in your mail client is not
Go a lot of spam
last night with subject lines Re[2] or [4] or [5]
Most are Cialis or
sperm pill spam. Also I received one of these emails that
was addressed to another user???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail server with qmail, qmailscanner, fetchmail, spamassassin,
clamav installed . My linux distribution is debian sarge.
When spamassasin check a mail I notice in the header of the mail the
following:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.2 required=4.0
The problem
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> If, for
> example I had an IMAP folder into which I drop spam that my mail
> server should report on my behalf -then reporting would become far
> less of a chore.
I'd be interested in this very much. Currently, I move SPAM into a
Hi
I've found FP 70_sare_spoof.cf triggering with SARE_FORGED_CITI
In the rule
header __RCVD_CITIBNK Received =~
/(?:citi(?:bank|cards|corp|bankcards)|acxiom|c2it)\.com/i
header __FROM_CITIBNK From =~ /citi(?:bank)?\.com/i
uri __URI_CITIBNK /citi(?:bank)?\.c
jdow wrote:
You do not say which version of spamassassin you are using. If it is not
3.04 an upgrade might help.
It's 3.04 - the latest stable build that's made it into "Gentoo Portage"
* Is there somewhere where I can report spams which aren't caught by
the default configuration in
Hi,
I have a mail server with qmail, qmailscanner, fetchmail, spamassassin,
clamav installed . My linux distribution is debian sarge.
When spamassasin check a mail I notice in the header of the mail the
following:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.2 required=4.0
The problem is the content of file /etc
On Montag, 12. September 2005 22:43 Rob McEwen wrote:
> but I'm finding that the IP addresses of many legit
> sending mail servers for both hotmail and bellsouth are now listed on
> many RBLs.
Hi, I'm using these RBLs on our production servers:
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, dnsbl.njabl.org, bl.spamcop.net
Hello,
I have a problem with both 3.1.0-rc1 and 3.1.0-rc2.
Some off my mail is checked by SA and marked as spam but gets an extra LF
causing the rest of my tools to ignore the X-Spam-Status header field.
This is a sample message, I do have more for developers. This problem isn't
occuring on
32 matches
Mail list logo
