On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:45:35PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> takes 12 secs in 3.1.0 trunk, and consumes about 180MB of RAM alright. it
> also produces lots of ugly non-fatal warnings:
>
> Deep recursion on subroutine
> "Mail::SpamAssassin
I have been checking my logs and it seems that even when an email comes in
with a whitelisted address (making its score below the default threshold for
autolearn ham), it is not learned as ham. According to the logs, nothing is
ever autolearned as ham. Does autolearn ignore the whitelisted mails?
Haven't seen tax spam yet.but there's definitely been more phishing
in general and more drug spam as of late too. I got a very convincing
paypal notice this morning
Ben
Thanks for the replies...
how should I call procmail from the postfix main.cf? We have:
mailbox_command = /usr/local/bin/procmail -f- -a "$USER"
is this correct for a global setting?
Thanks,
Kyle Reynolds
972-731-4731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
takes 12 secs in 3.1.0 trunk, and consumes about 180MB of RAM alright. it
also produces lots of ugly non-fatal warnings:
Deep recursion on subroutine
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Message::Node::content_summary" at
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Node.pm line
Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:08:44PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
Hello list
Well, so far no replies to my post regarding "deep recursion" errors.
I have tested the message with 'spamassassin' (ie. not spamc/spamd) with
the same result. The scanning too
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:28:54PM +0100, Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:22:54PM -0500, Pierre Thomson wrote:
> > You're right; there should be some recursion detection built into SA that
> > gives up before resources are exhausted.
> >
> > I tried scanning the email on a
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:22:54PM -0500, Pierre Thomson wrote:
> You're right; there should be some recursion detection built into SA that
> gives up before resources are exhausted.
>
> I tried scanning the email on a Pentium3-800 with 256 MB running SA 2.64. It
> took 14.9 seconds to scan, but
Just got my first one today! Tax spam!! Get ready for the onslaught that is
sure to follow this time of year.
I'm thinking we may just see the possibility to Electronic Tax refund
Phishing as well. Just something to start thinking about.
--Chris
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:08:44PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
> Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
> >Hello list
> >
> >Well, so far no replies to my post regarding "deep recursion" errors.
> >
> >I have tested the message with 'spamassassin' (ie. not spamc/spamd) with
> >the same result. The scanning took 21
You're right; there should be some recursion detection built into SA that gives
up before resources are exhausted.
I tried scanning the email on a Pentium3-800 with 256 MB running SA 2.64. It
took 14.9 seconds to scan, but didn't crash anything. Free memory dropped by
about 20 MB during the ru
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:02:52PM -0500, Pierre Thomson wrote:
> Martin,
>
> The message itself looks like the recursion problem... a spammer sent a drug
> spam, and the rejection message (to a local address) looped some 122 times at
> 5-second intervals until SA bombed. It's hard to imagine A
> Geoff Soper writes:
>> > Geoff Soper writes:
>> >> bash-2.05a$ perl -V
>> >> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1)
>> configuration:
>> > ..
>> >> @INC:
>> >> /home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux
Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
Hello list
Well, so far no replies to my post regarding "deep recursion" errors.
I have tested the message with 'spamassassin' (ie. not spamc/spamd) with
the same result. The scanning took 21 CPU seconds on a Intel Pentium 3,
1133 MHz and consumed 180 MB memory.
Am I the
Martin,
The message itself looks like the recursion problem... a spammer sent a drug
spam, and the rejection message (to a local address) looped some 122 times at
5-second intervals until SA bombed. It's hard to imagine ANY program that can
disentangle 122 MIME-encapsulated emails inside each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Soper writes:
> > Geoff Soper writes:
> >> bash-2.05a$ perl -V
> >> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
> > ..
> >> @INC:
> >> /home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-li
Hello list
Well, so far no replies to my post regarding "deep recursion" errors.
I have tested the message with 'spamassassin' (ie. not spamc/spamd) with
the same result. The scanning took 21 CPU seconds on a Intel Pentium 3,
1133 MHz and consumed 180 MB memory.
Am I the only one seeing this pro
>-Original Message-
>From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 1:47 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: how to call procmail for spam delete?
>
>
>> I am running spamassassin as root (for now...), globally.
>Spam sho
Hi Rainer,
You mean I should always start amavisd service with debug-sa options?
Thanks
Vincent
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:45:08PM +0100, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
>
>> spamassassin -D is your friend.
>
> Sorry, have to correct myself:
> amavisd debug-sa, in this particular case.
>
> Rainer
>
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:45:08PM +0100, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
> spamassassin -D is your friend.
Sorry, have to correct myself:
amavisd debug-sa, in this particular case.
Rainer
> I am running spamassassin as root (for now...), globally. Spam should be
> getting marked and deleted or moved to a generic spambox on the
> spamassassin server with no individual user spamboxes.
This works:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
#
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes
/home/john/Spam
If I substitute /dev/
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:23:46AM -0800, Vincent wrote:
[amavisd-new and SA]
> not under /usr/share/spamassassin? I have /etc/mail/spamassassin,
> /var/amavis/.spamassassin folder too. I put a lot of local custom rules
> *.cf under /etc/mail/spamassassin, my local.cf is empty. it seems that
> Sp
> Geoff Soper writes:
>> bash-2.05a$ perl -V
>> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
> ..
>> @INC:
>> /home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/
>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux
>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1
>> /
Hi all,
This question might have been asked many times, I googled, no answer found
yet. I am running Mac OS X/Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin3.0. SpamAssassin is
called by Amavisd-new. my amavisd.conf :
# SpamAssassin settings
$sa_local_tests_only = 1; # (default: false)
$sa_timeout = 30;
$sa_mail_bo
I am running spamassassin 2.5 with postfix and procmail (spamc/spamd). I
am unable to get procmail to delete messages marked spam. I have tried
variations of recipes that I have found on the net, but it doesn't seem to
be working. Spamassassin works fine, but I'm thinking that I might not be
cal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Soper writes:
> bash-2.05a$ perl -V
> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
..
> @INC:
> /home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-lin
Yes - I have the 1.65
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:13 PM 1/25/2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm doing a new install on a Fedora Core 3 AMD 64 box with the 64 bit
OS. I'm getting the following error:
Jan 24 14:42:00 localhost spamd[4661]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
non-method Time::HiRes::time() is de
At 12:13 PM 1/25/2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm doing a new install on a Fedora Core 3 AMD 64 box with the 64 bit OS.
I'm getting the following error:
Jan 24 14:42:00 localhost spamd[4661]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:13:45AM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Jan 24 14:42:00 localhost spamd[4661]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
> non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1103.
>
> So - yes - I did install Time::HiRes several
I'm
doing a new install on a Fedora Core 3 AMD 64 box with the 64 bit OS.
I'm getting the following error:
Jan 24 14:42:00 localhost spamd[4661]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1103.
So -
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:50:41AM -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
> Now that I got SQL Bayes storage running with MySQL, I thought I'd do a
> quick and dirty performance comparison on sa-learn.
>
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesBenchmark
Michael
pgpLYtApUp2qA.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Now that I got SQL Bayes storage running with MySQL, I thought I'd do a
quick and dirty performance comparison on sa-learn.
I restored backups of 100,512 spam, and 61,653 ham from my current bayes
database, then tried "sa-learn --spam --mbox" of 72 recent spams from my
spam folder.
Here are th
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: What to do with my spam?
At 10:07 PM 1/24/2005, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to automagically report
At 10:07 PM 1/24/2005, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to automagically report messages via
spamd, maybe if they score over a certain level?
No. That feature was present in old versions of SA, but it removed from SA
in the 2.3 series at the strong request of the Razor dev
At 10:49 AM 1/25/2005, Troy Bull wrote:
I have seen a tools directory referenced, in my v2.63 installation it
was at /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-tools-2.63/tools. I installed 3.0.2
via perl -MCPAN -e shell and I dont have the 3.0.2 version tools
directory.What package do i need to install to g
Morris Jones wrote:
After installing when I run "spamd -D -x -q" I get "Can't locate
Mail/Spamassassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm in @INC (@INC contains: lib ../lib
I had this line in my local.cf:
bayes_store_module Mail::Spamassassin::BayesStore::SQL
SpamAssassin was missing the capital 'A'.
Mojo
--
Mor
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:49:38AM -0600, Troy Bull wrote:
> I have seen a tools directory referenced, in my v2.63 installation it
> was at /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-tools-2.63/tools. I installed 3.0.2
> via perl -MCPAN -e shell and I dont have the 3.0.2 version tools
> directory.What packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings:
I have seen a tools directory referenced, in my v2.63 installation it
was at /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-tools-2.63/tools. I installed 3.0.2
via perl -MCPAN -e shell and I dont have the 3.0.2 version tools
directory.What package do i nee
At 10:27 AM 1/25/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But after correct my rules, I re-test and I received
spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out
Net::DNS version is 0.19, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
Can't locate object method "handle_auto_report" via pa
Thank you Matt
But after correct my rules, I re-test and I received
spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out
Net::DNS version is 0.19, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
Can't locate object method "handle_auto_report" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsg
From: "Rainer Sokoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:03:16AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>
> >to train its Bayes database on spam and ham messages. You can either
> >tell SpamAssassin to autolearn (which I do not use or recommend) or
>
> Why can't you recommend sa-autolearn? Fro
At 09:11 AM 1/25/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a debian woody qmail server using qmailrocks how-to but my
spamassassin is out of work. I'm using apt-get to install it, but I
receive many erros like that. How can I solve it
I receive this errors from a spamassassin standard spam test
At 07:48 AM 1/25/2005, Johan Segernäs wrote:
Hello!
We receive around 500.000 mails every day and I'm wondering which net-check I
should use. I guess we can't just use pyzor/razor/dcc out of the box because
of large amount of queries against there servers?
You could use DCC more-or-less out of the
Hi ALL
I installed a debian woody qmail server using qmailrocks how-to but my
spamassassin is out of work. I'm using apt-get to install it, but I
receive many erros like that. How can I solve it
I receive this errors from a spamassassin standard spam test.
Failed to run LINES_OF_YELLING SpamAssa
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What in the name of the great Fubar is an "autobundle" and how might
> one gutsy enough to use one go about doing it?
You create one by saying
autobundle
at the CPAN prompt.
This writes a `bundle file' into your CPAN bundle directory (probably
~/.c
On 2005-01-25 05:26 -0800 or thereabouts, Jeff Chan wrote:
> SpamAssassin 3 has a number of network tests enabled by default.
> For the RBL ones, you should set up local mirroring of the DNS
> zone files. See for example:
As far as I understand it's prepared to use razor/pyzor/dcc and stuff but I
On Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 4:48:56 AM, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> We receive around 500.000 mails every day and I'm wondering which net-check I
> should use. I guess we can't just use pyzor/razor/dcc out of the box because
> of large amount of queries against there servers?
SpamAssassin 3 has a nu
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:03:16AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>to train its Bayes database on spam and ham messages. You can either
>tell SpamAssassin to autolearn (which I do not use or recommend) or
Why can't you recommend sa-autolearn? From my experience (sa with
autolearning enabled, sitewide
Hello!
We receive around 500.000 mails every day and I'm wondering which net-check I
should use. I guess we can't just use pyzor/razor/dcc out of the box because
of large amount of queries against there servers?
Suggestions?
1) Can't be done. SpamAssassin is a ranking tool. It does not delete or
even reroute messages.
2) Mooted by the fact that SpamAssassin does not do any quarantine. It
simply and only marks mail with a spam likelihood rating. Now, what
you seem to be speaking of involves training. SpamAssass
Hi,
I have two questions, that I couldn't find answer in spamassassin
documentation, FAQ and this group.
First one:
How to configure spamassassin to pernamently delete all spam messages
that has spam level over for example 12?
Second one:
The message was marked as a spam by spamassassin and qua
I'm having a problem running SpamAssassin, it's not finding the
Digest::SHA1 module. I've successfully installed this modules locally in
/home/alphaworks/perl_modules:
bash-2.05a$ find /home/alphaworks/perl_modules -name 'SHA1.pm' -print
/home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:19:54PM -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
> This is the output from "sudo spamd -D -x -q":
>
> It says it' can't locate SQL.pm, but the file is right there where it
> says it's looking:
What are the permissions/ownership of the file?
Michael
pgpMkI0wxJfJN.pgp
Description:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:11:48 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:07:27PM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>> Does anyone know if there is a way to automagically report messages via
>> spamd, maybe if they score over a certain level?
>
>No way. It does checks only.
Well, it depends...
I h
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:07:27PM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to automagically report messages via
> spamd, maybe if they score over a certain level?
No way. It does checks only.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Money can't buy love, but it improves your ba
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: What to do with my spam?
spamssassin -r will report to spamcop (sa 3.0+), learn as spam, and if you
have them installed report to dc
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Prior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: installing SA with milter
I think I'm ready to take the next step and upgrade my SA
installation to a milter setup which rejects mail over a
certain threshold. It looks like
On Monday, January 24, 2005, 9:37:55 AM, Damir Cosic wrote:
> Soon after version 3.0.0 became available, I did an upgrade. I don't
> remember all the steps I executed, but I know I was following
> instructions and it left me under an impression that everything went
> smoothly. Next day, I realized
Peter Marshall wrote:
I have been doing a bit of reading, and I am a bit confused. Is there any
advantage to having your postfix user info, and spamassassin inform stored
in a mysql database as opposed to just using the /etc/passwd file for users,
If all your users can log in to a shell prompt and
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2005, at 1:00 AM, Cor wrote:
>
> > hahaha, pay me a few extra thousand a month and I will mount a cell
> > phone
> > tower on my head and carry it around hehehe. ;)
> >
>
> I was chatting with a fellow who was a volunteer fireman at one of
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Kelson wrote:
> jdow wrote:
> > Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want an unsightly
> > cellphone tower there.
>
> Something I've started to see here in southern California is cell phone
> towers disguised as palm trees. Suspiciously symmetrical palm tree
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Jim Maul wrote:
> Im in the northeast (NY) and as such, am not in GTE land. And believe
> me, the support from verizon backs this up. As i stated earlier, the
> initial setup was a nightmare. Then after having having the line for a
> couple weeks, i decided to upgrade to
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:29:44PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> clear_report_template
> report _SUMMARY_
>
> "fixes" my problem, but it seems odd that local cf directives aren't.
Hrm. As far as I can tell, there's no way to get the contents of the
"report" config into the header without modifyin
I have been doing a bit of reading, and I am a bit confused. Is there any
advantage to having your postfix user info, and spamassassin inform stored
in a mysql database as opposed to just using the /etc/passwd file for users,
and whatever comes with spamassassin to store its data ? It just seems
This is the output from "sudo spamd -D -x -q":
It says it' can't locate SQL.pm, but the file is right there where it
says it's looking:
---
trying to connect to syslog/unix...
no error connecting to syslog/unix
logging enabled:
65 matches
Mail list logo
