On Monday, January 3, 2005, 9:25:20 AM, Gary Funck wrote:
>> From: Thomas Arend
>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:55 AM
>>
>> I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
>>
>> Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist?
>>
> You probably need to
On Monday, January 3, 2005, 7:55:11 AM, Thomas Arend wrote:
> I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
> Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist?
> Here is the report:
> Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
> pts rule na
On 01/03/05 03:16 PM, Kelson sat at the `puter and typed:
> Keith Whyte wrote:
> > i send viruses to /dev/null but i bounce spam, partly in the vain hope
> > that some spammers might actually back off after multiple failures, and
> > mainly in case of false positives, so that the sender knows the
Keith Whyte wrote:
i send viruses to /dev/null but i bounce spam, partly in the vain hope
that some spammers might actually back off after multiple failures, and
mainly in case of false positives, so that the sender knows the message
wasn't delivered.
>
> you have total control via configuration
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> David,
>
> I found that option and tried it, but here's what I get now when I run
> spamass-milter:
>
> Jan 3 22:16:09 maze spamass-milter[56478]: Could not extract score from
> J_CHICKENPOX_41,SARE_URI_PILLS autolearn=no version=2.64>
>
> Any ideas?
David,
I found that option and tried it, but here's what I get now when I run
spamass-milter:
Jan 3 22:16:09 maze spamass-milter[56478]: Could not extract score from
Any ideas?
Tim Gustafson
MEI Technology Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergenci
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
> "how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
> that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Tim Gustafson
Add the "-r 15" fl
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
> "how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
> that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
I don't use spamas
Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/03/2005 03:50:22 PM:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question
for me is
> >"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain
score", becau
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:47:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>By the way, we reject messages that score above 10 with a 550. We found
>that almost 95% of spam scores over 10, and almost zero ham scores above
>five. Messages scoring between 5 and 10 are accepted, tagged, and
>relayed to their reci
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 poin
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:45:41 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
>"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
>that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
>
>Thanks again!
>
T
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 poin
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:09:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:49:33 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Hello
> >
> > I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
> > opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) bu
Thanks for all the help everyone. I guess the real question for me is
"how do I make spamass-milter block e-mails of a certain score", because
that's how I integrate SpamAssassin into Sendmail.
Thanks again!
Tim Gustafson
MEI Technology Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(51
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:53:21 -0800, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 12:49 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
>>I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
>>opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
>>company has some instances where we get things
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:49:33 -0500, "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hello
>
> I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
> opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
> company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
At 12:49 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:44 AM
To: Dimitri Yioulos
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour problem - help please
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Happy New Year to all.
>
> I've searched the
Hello
I know that it's generally frowned upon to actually "block" SPAMs (as
opposed to marking them as SPAM and letting the user decide) but my
company has some instances where we get things that are blatantly,
absolutely, unequivocally SPAM (think scores in excess of 100 points
without BAYES or a
I agree with Louis. I graph various numbers from our postfix with
mailgrapher and I would say that the amount of mail we block has been
pretty consistent for the last 6 months at about 250 msg/min.
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 01/03/05 11:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
Over th
Andy Jezierski wrote:
Probably not. Every year around the holidays our spam hits a yearly low
usually the week of Christmas, then goes right back up to the previous
levels. I think some of the spammers may be taking a holiday break as
well.
I have to agree, but only based on my experiences this
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:18 PM
>To: Murty Rompalli
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Rule based on English words
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Hi Murty --
>
>It shoul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/03/2005 01:06:22
PM:
> Over the past month I've seen a ~25% dropoff in the amount of spam
we're
> receiving on a daily basis. Anyone else seeing a significant drop
in
> spam recently?
> --
>
> snowjack(a)fastmail.fm
>
Probably not. Every year around the holid
On 01/03/05 11:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> Over the past month I've seen a ~25% dropoff in the amount of spam we're
> receiving on a daily basis. Anyone else seeing a significant drop in
> spam recently?
I sincerely doubt it. I just turned on fetchmail to pull all my
> Could gibberish in this area give a few "bonus" scores?
Yes. And there are a number of rules and rulesets around to catch this sort of
stuff.
Of course, this also shows up in the HTML side of many spams, either in one
point type or in HTML comments or under an image spam in white text or
so
Hi,
I just happened to look at the lines that ware non-html readers on html emails.
Commercial programs usually suggest to buy a new mail reader
Some spam recently was seen carrying a fairly insulting message there
I believe that quite a bit of spam puts rather incomprehensible words in this
sp
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:06 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Are spammers finally feeling some pain?
>
>
>Over the past month I've seen a ~25% dropoff in the amount of
>spam we're
>receiving on
Over the past month I've seen a ~25% dropoff in the amount of spam we're
receiving on a daily basis. Anyone else seeing a significant drop in
spam recently?
--
snowjack(a)fastmail.fm
Does SA 3.0.2 contain the test patch
for low memory machines? Probably not, since nothing was mentioned
in the release note. That being the case, can the existing patch
be used as is for 3.0.2 or would it have to be modified for 3.0.2?
Thanks
Andy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Murty --
It should be easy enough to write a plugin which
- - registers an eval rule function
- - calls $permsgstatus->get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array() in that, to
get the array of decoded lines in the message (HTML stripped, MIME
decod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here are my Custom Rules. Any input / comments appreciated.
Download my rules from: http://solar.murty.net/~murty/sa/
Murty's Custom Rules for SpamAssassin
These are my custom rules for SpamAssassin
1. Murty.badchars.cf (http://solar.murty.net/~mur
> From: Thomas Arend
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:55 AM
>
> I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
>
> Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist?
>
You probably need to go to the places where the URL's are blacklisted,
and requrest that
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Happy New Year to all.
I’ve searched the list archive, and found some references to my
problem, but no solutions, so here goes again (sorry for the long
post, but I want to provide as much info. as necessary):
I recently upgraded to spamassassin 3.0.2 running o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 3. Januar 2005 16:47 schrieb Rodney Richison:
> I'd like to make sure I've got this right.
> To edit an existing rule like 20_dnsbl_tests.cf , I copy the rule to the
> /etc/spamassassin directory, then edit as I please like so..
Yes. But yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist?
Thanks,
Thomas
Here is the report:
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule
Loren,
Cron is set to get the rules at 1:30 AM each day. Even those fetches fail.
So, although I appreciate the tip, it's not the cause of my problem.
Dimitri
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:28 AM
To: Dimitri Yioulos
Su
I'd like to make sure I've got this right.
To edit an existing rule like 20_dnsbl_tests.cf , I copy the rule to the
/etc/spamassassin directory, then edit as I please like so..
header RCVD_IN_dnsbl_JAMM_com eval:check_rbl_txt('JAMM',
'dnsbl.JAMMConsulting.com.')
describe RCVD_IN_dnsbl_JAMM_com R
-Original Message-
Well, umh, uh, no. local.cf lives in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Rules live in
/usr/share/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/. And the Bayes part I just today tried
to make work. Do I (or rather, I do) have a misconfigured system? If so,
(with humble apologies for my stupidity) ho
Happy New Year to all.
I’ve searched the list archive, and found some
references to my problem, but no solutions, so here goes again (sorry for the
long post, but I want to provide as much info. as necessary):
I recently upgraded to spamassassin 3.0.2 running on CentOS
3.3. I’m als
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:51:38PM +0900, Cor wrote:
> according to the SA docs on this subject.. but text feild lenngths are
> only up to 255.. althou I think that the lengths were around 60. 255 is
> not even enough. Anyone seen this or know what I am talking about please
> let me know. I would l
I have a serious issue which may or may not have ever been addressed. I am
using SQL support with SA and recently noticed that the whitelist and
blacklist feild lengths are somewhat small. Moreover they can be written
in such a way as to cause mail delivery problems to users or block out all
email
Attached, is a Perl script, mdf2sa.pl, which converts spam messages
that have been marked up by MIMEDefang, into a form that is similar
to the message format used by SA. Also attached is a simple
procmail script, mdf2sa.rc, which drives the perl script, and
can be invoked via formail as follows:
Dear SpamAssassin users,
I hope you will forgive me for this mildly off-topic post. As you
probably already know, I am one of the core developers of
SpamAssassin, and I've been contributing actively to the project for
about 3 years (although I've contributed little recently due to lack
of time).
44 matches
Mail list logo
