On Monday, January 3, 2005, 7:55:11 AM, Thomas Arend wrote: > I have received a FalsePositive because arcor.de got into trhe blocklists.
> Has someone informations why arcor.de got into the blocklist? > Here is the report: > Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required) > pts rule name description > - ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > - -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > 2.0 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist > [URIs: arcor.de] > 0.4 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist > [URIs: arcor.de] > 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist > [URIs: arcor.de] > 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist > [URIs: arcor.de] arcor.de is not on any SURBL lists. In fact it is whitelisted so that it can't appear. You can look up SURBLs at: http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi Or just do a name resolution as described at: http://www.surbl.org/implementation.html You may be seeing a false positive as described at: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 Perhaps you can add some debugging information or a sample message to that bug. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
