Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> An attempt to install vlc failed because my system is missing one of
> the gpg key files, namely:
> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-27
> Attempts to install it fail, because it's not installed. At the bottom
> is a log of an attempt to install it, refor
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/02/2018 04:31 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Just did a dnf update, this comes out:
>>
>> ...
>>Running scriptlet: firefox-58.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64
>> 18/18
>>Running scriptlet: firefox-58.0-4.fc27.x86_64
>> 18/18
>> Run
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:17:10 +0800
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> But please be aware that you're subverting the plot by a secret society to
>> produce
>> copious indecipherable output so users will switch over to GUIs and have
>> things
>> hidden from view. :-) :-)
>
> And the
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/03/2018 05:57 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> The unit tasks are logged, so you can see them with
>> journalctl or in syslog. (Not that it's at all ideal to
>> have to look around to find what may have caused this
>> less-than-useful ou
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> It lets me know that something else was run, just like there's a line saying
> that it's running a scriptlet for package whatever. As I mentioned, I would
> much prefer that there was some part of that line that said what the unit is
> for, but at least with that line I know t
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/04/2018 08:34 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> The problem wasn't that it was silent. It was that it was a
>> long(ish)-running process that was not suited to run as a
>> scriptlet. It's better done via cron or as it is now as
Hi,
Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> I just tried to install system-config-kickstart, because i want to
> create a media for "unattented installation" and got this error:
>
> # dnf install system-config-kickstart
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 3:25:11 am Di 06 Feb 2018
> 19:46:57 CET.
Hi,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package.
> Could you help me?
>
> I have been here
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
> I run
> rpmbuild -ba textext.spec
>
> Here is my file:
>
> Name: textext
> Version:
Hi,
Frederic Muller wrote:
> Happy user of Gjots2 there was an automatic update over the weekend
> which unformately now refuses (well doesn't offer a prompt) to open GPG
> encrypted files. So I cannot use it anymore. I downgraded to the
> previous version and it's working fine. Not sure if it's m
Hi Dirk,
Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 06.02.2018, 19:12 -0500 schrieb Todd Zullinger:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com is the place for this sort of
>> issue. There's a handy shortcut to find bugs for a given
>> package at bugz.fedoraproject.org. I sta
Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.02.2018, 12:54 -0500 schrieb Matthew Miller:
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:37:14PM +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
If you have a fix, rather than filing a bug, consider submitting
a
pull request to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/s
Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> I have a FAS Account, but AFAIK I'm not in the packagers group. That
> could be the Problem. But, that to be said, my Cardreader is not even
> accessed.
Hmm. I don't know for certain, but if you've gotten a fork,
I would think you'd be able to clone from that via ssh.
The
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline compiler
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2018 02:32 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> If that's accepted, I or someone else can work on adding the
>> same V=1 to the make command for the other nvidia-*-kmod
>> packages.
>
> The question is, how many people would want to see the e
Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/21/18 07:28, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>> I've been learning R on both Fedora and Ubuntu.
>>>
>>> I've noticed that Ubuntu has considerably greater
>>> support for R than Fedora (more R deb packages than R
>>> rpm packages).
>>>
>>> Is th
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/24/18 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> not sure why i never noticed this before, but even though updating
>> my fedora box keeps only the last three versions of the kernel, i have
>> a couple dozen /lib/modules directories each representing an older
>> version of the ke
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i honestly don't recall how they came to be there, but i rarely
> install anything on my fedora system *not* via an actual .rpm package.
I don't know how Virtualbox works, but perhaps some version
in the past installed via rpm and then helpfully compiled
modules for upd
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I wonder if that version is actually prename ('dnf install prename')
> under a different name, which would be nicely ironic ...
Heh. I think they're different. I'm not a Debian user
though, so I could be way off on what follows. :)
This gets quite messy. The /usr/b
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'm curious about RH packaging policy that dictates that some
> command variants are packaged for fedora to install with symlinks
> and others with hardlinks.
>
> trivial example in /usr/bin on my fedora 27 system:
>
> -rwsr-xr-x. 1 root root52984 Aug 2
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ... ah, so the replacement of those cross-directory hardlinks with
> symlinks will happen in F28, is that what you're saying?
The change will be in F28, yes. The few files in /usr/bin
are simply copied, not symlinked. Within /usr/bin, the
identical files are hardlinked
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 01:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>that was my understanding -- as long as the files are within
>> precisely the same directory, hard links could still be used, but any
>> cross-directory links (even if within the same filesystem) will use
>> symlinks. is tha
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 03:06 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> In the git package, there aren't symlinks. Within /usr/bin,
>> the git binaries which are identical are hardlinked to each
>> other. And separately, within /usr/libexec/git-core, the
>> git
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Well, you very well may have the keys for Negativo17 but
> it is just that whoever is the maintainer missed signing
> the RPM as the error states.
FWIW, the maintainer at negativo17.org said this error has
been corrected (in the comment section at the URL below).
> IMHO, since
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Top-posting is specifically discouraged by the Guidelines
> of this and other lists hosted by Fedora, not to mention
> many other mailing lists of a technical nature. Please
> read:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Proper_posting_style
This r
chicago wrote:
> I think both top posting and bottom posting are asinine.
> The correct answer is to delete the quoted text and reply.
>
> If there's something you're replying to in particular,
> maybe quote that one line but there's no need to quote the
> entire thread so far in every email in th
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> With the move to mailman3, the list footer cannot be set via
>> the web-based admin interface. I dug into the mailman3
>> documentation and filed an infrastructure ticket to see
Philip Rhoades wrote:
> On 2018-03-27 12:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> If you run top, which process is using the CPU? Just kill that one,
>> then go through your chrome tabs and find out which tab has the sad
>> face on it.
>
> That usually doesn't work from my recollection, no individual tab seems
Hi Bill,
home user wrote:
> Some of you have neat sayings beneath your signature. A
> good one in this thread is "Conjecture is just a
> conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a
> fact.".
>
> I'm seeing comments implying that messages from
> yahoo-based member accounts are not reac
I wrote:
> I am not familiar enough with DMARC and Mailman3 to know
> whether there are any work-arounds available for this issue
> or not. There aren't any great solutions to it, in any
> case.
A little further reading tells me that Mailman supports a
few possible work-arounds¹. I've mentioned
Hi all,
As we've discussed in this thread and others recently,
messages from subscribers @yahoo.com do not reach
subscribers @gmail.com (among others). This is due to an
aggressive policy set by Yahoo which breaks mail sent via
the mailing list.
The mitigation enabled should change the From: add
Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/27/2018 12:03 PM, home user wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't matter either way.
>>
>> If you have a yahoo.com address and send from your email client via
>> yahoo's email servers, it still goes to fedoraprojects lists server and
>> sends out from there. If you sent from hyperkit
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 17:27 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As we've discussed in this thread and others recently,
>> messages from subscribers @yahoo.com do not reach
>> subscribers @gmail.com (among others).
I wrote:
> That might be sped up if someone reading is interested in
> filing a bug upstream and perhaps even providing a patch to
> hyperkitty. Someone from the infrastructure team may
> eventually be able to do just that, but I know they have
> many, many items on their list of tasks. :)
>
>
First, thanks for replying. It shows the list changes in
action. At least it appears to work as intended. :)
Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 27 March 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
>> All that said, the best solution would be to stop using
>> @yahoo.com as a mail provi
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> As a strictly email client user I hope fewer people will use the HyperKitty
>> interface
>> with these mis-features. :-)
>
> It's feature creep. The unwarranted desire to turn a simple archive
> page into a full-featured web forum interface, which AFAIK nobody asked
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> The front page for the month of March shows the most recent 10 messages
> with a lot of white space. Compare the Evolution (old-style) list
> archive:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2017-March/thread.html
>
> I know which is more useful to me. For
home user via users wrote:
> This post should qualify as one test.
Indeed. The from is munged to:
From: home user via users
Unless we find some nasty gotcha that isn't obvious, I think
the settings change is a win. If it works here, it might be
worth setting as the default for other fedor
stan wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:27:40 -0400
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> As we've discussed in this thread and others recently,
>> messages from subscribers @yahoo.com do not reach
>> subscribers @gmail.com (among others). This is due to an
>> aggressive po
Hi John,
sa...@wexfordpress.com wrote:
> Installed Fedora 26 on recommendation of a Scribus
> developer. Installed about 30 packages per his advice.
>
> But when I try to compile a program the machine can't find
> C++. So what is the package I need to install to compile
> C++ programs?.
gcc-c+
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 20:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I don't know the "official or approved" process but looking in koji I see
>> that
>> Benjamin Pereto is doing all the builds and
>> appears in the
>> changelog. So, being the dummy I am I'd email him. :-) :-)
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> The maintainer has accepted the idea and Borgmatic is on track for F28
> and EL-7:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=borgmatic
>
> Thanks to Ed and Todd for the suggestions.
Excellent! Thanks for nudging things forward. Soon someone
else will run
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> After upgrading to Fedora 28, most of Youtube is broken in Firefox, claiming
> lack of H.264 codec support.
>
> Googling around, found this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenH264
I think that H.264 implementation is somewhat limited (and
stale, in addition to not having
stan wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:23:28 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
>>> To Todd's point, I noticed in my updates today that rpmfusion had
>>> ffmpeg updates, so that might solve your problem.
>>
>> Yes, that seems to be one way to get there.
>>
>> I already had rpmfusion, and this us
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
>> Except that you can't at the moment. :)
>>
>> That's what I was saying in my reply to Sam. The
>> compat-ffmpeg28 package is not in the rpmfusion-free
>> repositories for f28. This is most l
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/27/2018 01:38 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> I installed the f27 packages in f28 to test and that was
>> not sufficient for H.264 on youtube though. That might
>> be the same thing you did. (I just changed $releasever
>> in the fedora-cisco-ope
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I distinctly recall that the automatic download and install of the external
> plugin was explicitly disabled in Firefox, a year or so, ago. I was able to
> find this thread in the archives:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/thread.html#19117
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Is the plugin you're talking about really relevant? The description of it
> says:
>
> This plugin is automatically installed by Mozilla to comply with the WebRTC
> specification and to enable WebRTC calls with devices that require the H.264
> video codec.
>
> It doesn't app
D&R wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 06:15:08 -0400
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 04/27/2018 07:26 AM, D&R wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:22:12 -0400
Tom H wrote:
>
> sudo -s
> sudo su
> sudo su -l
> sudo sh
> sud
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/28/18 08:01, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Is the plugin you're talking about really relevant? The description of it
>>> says:
>>>
>>> This plugin is automatically installed by Mozilla to comply with
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/29/18 01:27, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Well, enabling the plugin on a F28 system results in a
>>> message saying the plugin will be downloaded
>>> soon.but it never does. At least not after 2hrs of
>&g
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Claws-Mail doesn't start on FC28 because it can't find
> libnsl.so.1. A softlink to libnsl.so.2 fixes the issue.
It's probably better to install libnsl which provides
libnsl.so.1 rather than creating a symlink to a different
library version.
But for what it's worth, claws-m
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Is it possible to get $SUBJECT working? I need to install 'grip' from
> https://github.com/joeyespo/grip, and trying to do so as a normal user
> isn't working (permission denied errors trying to write to
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages).
I believe you need to add the --use
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I'm installing fedora 28 from the "install to disk" option
> of the workstation live CD.
>
> I don't appear to ever get an opportunity to set the
> hostname to anything other than the default
> localhost.localdomain.
>
> Did I miss it, or is this just something I need to chan
Terry Polzin wrote:
> Is there a Firefox ESR for F28, I just upgraded and have found that
> firefox and java are having certificate issues trying to run a JNLP
> application.
Not officially, but there is a COPR with 52esr here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mavit/firefox-esr/
--
Todd
stan wrote:
> From the man page for rpmbuild:
> """
> --with OPTION
> Enable configure OPTION for build.
>
> --without OPTION
> Disable configure OPTION for build.
> """
>
> Does adding the option --without _enable_debug_packages to the end
> of the rpmbuild line work
Robin Lee wrote:
> I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible
> with old behavior,
> I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpackage and
> Source Debuginfo'[1].
> That means let rpm not generate debugsource and subpackage debuginfo.
> Simply adding '%_debug
Franta Hanzlík wrote:
> I want to upgrade my Fedora 19 server to Fedora 27, but is seems as
> from cca Fedora 24+ ocsinventory packages (server and agents) are not
> in Fedora repos (although this SW is still maintained and released
> under (Fedora acceptable) GPLv2 license:
> http://ask.ocsinvento
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2018 23:57:53 -0400
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> The --with/--without arguments toggle conditions set via
>> %bcond_with and %bcond_without. So that won't do what Robin
>> wants.
>>
>> More details on --with/--without
Robin Lee wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Robin Lee wrote:
>>> I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible
>>> with old behavior,
>>> I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpacka
Robin Lee wrote:
> I am using the planex[1] tool to do massive rpm rebuild.
> It use something like 'rpm -q --specfile' to predict the result
> rpms, and generate a dependency tree. And then use this info to
> build rpms in el7 mock one by one.
>
> I then use the ''%_debugsource_template %{nil}' t
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:43:59AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Not me, anaconda did it :-). I've now erased it and
>> things are back to normal. Thanks. (I read the description
>> of this in rpm -i, and I still have no idea what it is
>> good for).
>
> It is very commonly
I wrote:
> It looks like scl-utils requires it. If environment-modules
> is updated to 4.1 in the next RHEL, that will be a fun
> surprise for many of those users -- who are far more likely
> to have scl-utils installed, I imagine.
Talking with Matthew, I filed a ticket about this issue:
http
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>>> With the move to mailman3, the list footer cannot be set via
>>>
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/24/18 11:26, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> This is just a notice to others who may run into this
>>
>> I just updated a system where I use the nVidia drivers from rpmfusion.
>> After the
>> update I could not get a login screen. Just a mouse cursor on a black
>> background.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 05/06/2018 02:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> So, just to follow up here, the f28 and rawhide fedora-cisco-openh264
>> repos are now populated, and have been for a bit.
>
> FWIW, this may be fixed, but Firefox v60 + OpenH264 is still broken.
>
> - The about:plugins pa
Beartooth wrote:
>
> Followups set to gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general
>
> Pan on F28, which I update at least once daily, still crashes instead of
> launching. From the command line with ampersand:
>
> $ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h:1021: std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::const_r
Ed Greshko wrote:
> OK, is anyone else seeing this and/or finding this annoying?
>
> Getting list emails where I don't really know who is sending. The "From"
> shows as
>
> None via users
>
> So, it is showing up as "Fedora" in the From column of T-Bird. The actual
> header in the email ar
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 19:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/04/18 18:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2018-06-03 at 20:07 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I see the following rpms in the repo:
# grep xml2rfc dnf.lst
python2-xml2rfc.noarch
Danny Horne via users wrote:
> On 04/06/18 18:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Oh, this is fun! I use Thunderbird and run my own mail server. I
>> checked message source and for this message from you I find:
>>
>> From: Danny Horne via users
>> Cc: Danny Horne
>>
>>
>> So something is rewriting t
Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 4 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
>> I don't think there's much we can do about it on the list
>> side.
>
> If an email address didn't have a name portion, I would have used the
> email accountname immediatel
Hi,
lejeczek via users wrote:
> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
>
> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
>
> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working..
> I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so if you try just
> command line do
lejeczek via users wrote:
> On 08/06/18 16:39, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> lejeczek via users wrote:
>>> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
>>>
>>> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
>>>
>>> I'
Hi,
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I run the bro network security monitor. Due to recent changes in openssl
> the bro monitor will no longer compile with openssl 1.1 only with openssl
> 1.0. As a result I had to uninstall openssl-devel and install the
> compat-openssl10-devel package. As part of the r
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I know I could uninstall the compat devel package and re-install the openssl
> devel package, but then if there are updates to bro I would have to
> uninstall the openssl-devel package and re-install the compat devel
> package. I was hoping there would be some way to avoid
lejeczek via users wrote:
> I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read?
>
> $ _def1="_me 1"
> $ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\'
>
> and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not
> "react" to it. I run it from a bash script.
> I should mention I'm on Centos 7.5. RP
lejeczek via users wrote:
> It actually might be working. What I was doing I was looking for a
> confirmation like this:
>
> $ ps -FC rpmbuild --cols
> UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD
> appmgr 24855 24835 0 44512 6772 16 17:33 pts/000:00:00 rpmbuil
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>>> FWIW, to match using a wildcard you'd have to use `rpm -qa pulseaudio*`.
>>
>> Don't think so:
>>
>> # `rpm -qa pulseaudio*`
>> bash: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-
Tony Nelson wrote:
> That is not what he means. Would one of you please look
> at the RPM man page?
To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
--
Todd
~~
From th
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 09:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Don't include the tick marks, it tried to execute what's inside... What
>> he means is that rpm doesn't accept wildcards so if you want to find
>> partial matches, you need to pipe it to grep...
>>
>> # rpm -qa | grep pulseau
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Ah, I left off the 'list' portion of your command
>
> # dnf history list pulseaudio*
> ID | Command line | Date and time| Action(s) |
> Altered
> ---
> 2 | update
Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
>> To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
>> wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
>
> I've always successfully done things like this:
>
> rp
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 18:46 Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa pulse*
>>> pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64
>>> pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64
>>> pulseaudio-module-x11-11.1-
Hi,
Danishka Navin wrote:
> I noticed that createrepo failed on Fedora 28 under SELinux permissive as
> well.
>
> createrepo /data/dist/localrepo/h28/norach/
> Spawning worker 0 with 1 pkgs
> Spawning worker 1 with 1 pkgs
> Worker 0: Error: Could not open local rpm file:
> /data/dist/localrepo/h
Mike Wright wrote:
> On 06/23/2018 01:35 PM, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>>
>> my .ssh directory has my private key in a file called "id_rsa" nothing
>> with .pub on the end and if I understand correctly running ssh will look
>> for the private key in a few different file names, none of which end
>> with
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've never seen additional output before but when I remoted in to my F28
> desktop I got the following:
>
> Using username "".
> @'s password:
> Activate the web console with: systemctl enable --now cockpit.socket
>
> Last login: Sun Jul 1 09:26:49 2018
>
> What's up with
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:20 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> I've never seen additional output before but when I remoted in to my F28
>>> desktop I got the following:
>>>
>>> Using username &q
ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 28
> Xfce 4.12
>
> I have several large tar balls
>
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 todd users 6359558528 Jul 12 10:51
> 2018-07-12_OurStuff.tar.gz2
Is .gz2 a typo? I've only ever seen .bz2 or .gz. I doubt
that's related, but it's a curiosity.
> I have to deal wit
ToddAndMargo wrote:
> # perl -Msay -e 'say "Hi";'
> Can't locate say.pm in @INC (you may need to install the say module) (@INC
> contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5
> /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5
> /usr/share/perl5).
> BEGIN failed--
Suse Shi wrote:
> # dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:12:38 ago on Mon 27 Aug 2018 08:52:21 AM
> CST.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem: cannot install both
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.5-1.fc27.x86_64 and
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.4-2.fc27.x86_64
> - package gs
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 20:02 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 09/07/18 19:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> I'm not seeing any qbt-nox packages on Koji, just qbt itself. They must
>>> be there but the search shows up empty.
>>
>>
>> It is produced when qbittorrent it bu
Rick Stevens wrote:
> There is a one-shot systemd service that updates the man page database
> on boot (man-db-cache-update.service) which should already be installed.
>
> You can "dnf install man-db-cron", which will periodically update the
> database via crony. Or continue to do it manually. You
Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 9/14/18 2:30 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> The man-db-cache-update service is also run via a file
>> trigger whenever files are installed to /usr/share/man by a
>> package. (See: rpm -q --filetriggers man-db)
>
> I _thought_ there was ano
Danesh Manoharan wrote:
> I suspect we might have gotten blacklisted, maybe? We've
> been running a large lustre install with IML which tells
> it's hosts to pull from the repo.
I would try asking in #fedora-buildsys on irc.freenode.net
or send a message to the copr mailing list at
copr-de...@list
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/2/18 3:32 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> The WAN IP (DHCP) has been the same for months (auto renewal).
>> I was just wondering if bugzilla had that particular IP range
>> filtered for some reason.
>
> That's not a result you should get from filtering though. It would eithe
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:58:49 +0200
> "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
>
>> but I also would like to modify the version number
>> For example by adding a -1 or a "a"
>>
>> how can I do it?
>
> Doug's response is pertinent. But I'm going to read your mind and
> assume that you are trying to
stan wrote:
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use
> fedora-users mailing list feel about that. Which would
> you prefer?
Forums have never been something I care for. Anything which
forces its choice of interface upon me is something I don't
use joyfully.
But that said, I don't see an
Leander Hutton wrote:
> Discourse, Discord or Slack are what everyone seem to be clustering
> around these days. The main thing I like about mailing lists and even to
> some extent IRC is it's a bit more decentralized and is easily locally
> archived. They're also built around a standard or protoco
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/21/18 7:52 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> But that said, I don't see any reason why there could not be
>> a users forum and an email list co-existing.
>
> Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list?
>
> https://lists.fedor
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 08:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list?
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/
>
> That in my view is the perfect argument for not doing this. Hel
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I cannot mock-rebuild packages that have /some/ BuildRequires: with explicit
> file dependencies, for F40. I have no idea why just /some/ of them are
> rejected.
>
> I'm using mock to rebuild SRPMS in an F40 chroot, and it fails thusly:
>
> Updating and loading repositori
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
