On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:32:58 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS encryption
> of existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I am running
> into some errors. The trouble is that the file does not come with a
Currently I have problem with newer kernel RPMs on my Dell Dimension.
There's a bug in Bugzilla about this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231508
I have three kernel RPMs installed.
kernel-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64
kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64
kernel-4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64
Over the wee
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:18:03 +
Dave Cross wrote:
> Can I configure dnf so that it won't remove the working kernel RPM and
> new updates will replace the second oldest one? I'd obviously still
> like to install new RPMs so that I can test them to find when my
> problem is fixed.
>
> Thanks,
>
sure that you refer to dnf and not to dnf-yumex??
2015-11-30 10:18 GMT+01:00 Dave Cross :
> Currently I have problem with newer kernel RPMs on my Dell Dimension.
> There's a bug in Bugzilla about this.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231508
>
> I have three kernel RPMs installed.
[ email re-ordered to make more sense ]
On 30 November 2015 at 09:28, Antonio M wrote:
>
> 2015-11-30 10:18 GMT+01:00 Dave Cross :
>>
>> Currently I have problem with newer kernel RPMs on my Dell Dimension.
>> There's a bug in Bugzilla about this.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On 30 Nov 2015 at 11:17, Dave Cross wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:17:41 +
Subject:Re: DNF: Retainining old Kernels
From: Dave Cross
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support for
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 08:36 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 29.11.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the
> > overhead of
> > LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical
> > use
> > cases, LVM brings absolutely nothi
On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 23:01 -0800, William Biggs wrote:
> I would like to know know to remove compiz from mate desktop in
> fedora 23
What's wrong with "dnf erase compiz"?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 11/29/2015 10:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead of
> LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical use
> cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added. I would expect that, with
> most use cases, p
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 08:36 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 29.11.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the
> > overhead of
> > LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical
> > use
> > cases
Roberto Ragusa writes:
On 11/29/2015 10:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead of
LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical use
cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added. I would expect that, w
Congratulations to the Fedora team!
Upgraded three systems, one of them a VM, with no pain,
no problems.
Regards,
Tony
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
You can also increase the installonly_limit in dnf.conf
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, 2:24 PM Michael D. Setzer II
wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2015 at 11:17, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> Date sent: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:17:41 +
> Subject:Re: DNF: Retainining old Kernels
> From:
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 06:59 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > It's an issue that raises its head sporadically and has done for
> > several years. I'm also in the No camp and take care to disable LVM
> on
> > any new install, but I can't see the situation changing unless or
> until
> > something fun
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:03:06 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:32:58 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS
> > encryption of existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I
> > am r
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:29:09 -0800 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 05:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Thanks! I was wondering about this some more. Can I not put this tool
> > luksipc on a LiveCD and then compile and run it from there? Then the
> > actual disks would be "offline", isn't th
On 30 November 2015 at 11:24, Michael D. Setzer II
wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2015 at 11:17, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> Date sent: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:17:41 +
> Subject:Re: DNF: Retainining old Kernels
> From: Dave Cross
> To: Community su
On 30 November 2015 at 09:26, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:18:03 +
> Dave Cross wrote:
>
>> Can I configure dnf so that it won't remove the working kernel RPM and
>> new updates will replace the second oldest one? I'd obviously still
>> like to install new RPMs so that I can t
On 30 November 2015 at 13:00, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> You can also increase the installonly_limit in dnf.conf
That an interesting idea. Thanks.
Dave...
--
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Ranjan Maitra writes:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:29:09 -0800 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 05:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Thanks! I was wondering about this some more. Can I not put this tool
> > luksipc on a LiveCD and then compile and run it from there? Then the
> > actual disks wo
On 30 November 2015 at 09:26, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:18:03 +
> Dave Cross wrote:
>
>> Can I configure dnf so that it won't remove the working kernel RPM and
>> new updates will replace the second oldest one? I'd obviously still
>> like to install new RPMs so that I can t
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:38:50 -0500 Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra writes:
>
> > On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:29:09 -0800 Gordon Messmer
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/29/2015 05:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > > Thanks! I was wondering about this some more. Can I not put this tool
> > >
On 11/30/2015 01:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa writes:
>
>> On 11/29/2015 10:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead of
>>> LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical use
>>> cases, LV
On 30.11.2015, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Seat belts are also useless for >99.9% of car passengers. :-) The little
> inconvenience is accepted because
> they may turn useful one day.
LVM can not possibly be life-threatening, in opposite to a non-used
seatbelt, which is why your argument is bogus ;
Hi
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Tony Camuso wrote:
> Congratulations to the Fedora team!
>
> Upgraded three systems, one of them a VM, with no pain,
> no problems.
>
Good to know but more info would be useful for others. How did you upgrade?
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 15:58 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 30.11.2015, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> > Seat belts are also useless for >99.9% of car passengers. :-) The
> > little inconvenience is accepted because
> > they may turn useful one day.
>
> LVM can not possibly be life-threatening, in opp
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 13:00 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It does if a) there is no overhead (which is being claimed for LVM)
> and b) it doesn't burden the user, which LVM does even if you never do
> anything with it. The burden being a cognitive one: that you have to
> know it's there and u
On 11/30/2015 05:07 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Thanks again (to Gordon also)!
I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example spec
file I can look at for this?
Start here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
but get:
+ cd luksipc-0.04
+ install
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:33 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example
> spec file I can look at for this?
>
> I tried Gordon's suggestion and added:
>
>
> %install
> install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}
> install -m 755 luskipc $R
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:37:39 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:33 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example
> > spec file I can look at for this?
> >
> > I tried Gordon's suggestion and added:
> >
> >
>
On 11/30/2015 10:47 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Tony Camuso wrote:
Congratulations to the Fedora team!
Upgraded three systems, one of them a VM, with no pain,
no problems.
Good to know but more info would be useful for others. How did you
upgr
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:14:15 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Besides, I have always had the feeling that rpmbuild is too complicated,
> perhaps needlessly.
Not really. You just approach the "problem" from the wrong side.
If you wanted to compile and install the same software from source
*without*
On 11/29/2015 01:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the
overhead of LVM on everyone, by default.
I would imagine that the simple answer is "consistency."
The slightly longer answer, IMO:
Would you like to make snapshots for consistent bac
On 11/30/2015 03:44 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
This thread is about someone wanting to encrypt an existing
system: LVM makes it possible to do this, without a reboot,
without unmounting.
As far as I'm aware, no it doesn't.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
--
William Biggs
bbi...@fastmail.com
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 03:29 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 23:01 -0800, William Biggs wrote:
> > I would like to know know to remove compiz from mate desktop in
> > fedora 23
>
> What's wrong with "dnf erase compiz"?
>
> poc
On 11/30/2015 06:08 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
But there is only one filesystem (/dev/sda) and one HDD on these two
> >laptops. Therefore, I am not sure how to do this other than through going in
> >through a LiveCD.
Thanks! But I was talking about encrypting the /home partition which is
separate
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:29:01 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:14:15 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Besides, I have always had the feeling that rpmbuild is too complicated,
> > perhaps needlessly.
>
> Not really. You just approach the "problem" from the wrong side.
>
>
On 11/30/2015 02:19 PM, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote:
I also had no ( major ) problems with the upgrade. Just two little
things ... I had to regen my ssh keys and recopy them to all my
computers that I used ssh to access to and from the system. Something
about ssh not supporting dss anymore. I just
Hi! It would seem that the current kernel of f23 have no support for the
bluetooth part
of RT3290 ... is it possible to be added? what is the cause for bluetooth not
being
supported but the wireless part is supported?
Thank you!
Adrian
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
On 11/30/2015 08:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 03:44 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> This thread is about someone wanting to encrypt an existing
>> system: LVM makes it possible to do this, without a reboot,
>> without unmounting.
>
> As far as I'm aware, no it doesn't.
It does.
Supp
On 11/30/2015 11:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
luksipc.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Security
...
What is the correct group to put it into? I made up Applications/Security but
clearly that guess is not right:-)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups
cryptsetup is in Applications/Sys
On 11/30/2015 12:59 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 11/30/2015 08:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
As far as I'm aware, no it doesn't.
You can encrypt the system without even rebooting.
Connect an external temporary USB disk (dev/sdb).
Create a PV there (big enough for all your partitions).
...
Yes
On 11/30/2015 01:06 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
You can add a PV to encrypt the system without rebooting.
... should note that you'll have to shrink at least one of your volumes,
though. The encrypted PV that you create will be slightly smaller than
it was, before encryption. As a result, the
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:54:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I did read the README which says that all that is needed to be done is:
>
> make
And once you've compiled the executable, you are free do put in anywhere
you like. Such as somewhere below /usr/local or into your user's local
dir that's w
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:59:35 +0100 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 08:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 11/30/2015 03:44 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> >> This thread is about someone wanting to encrypt an existing
> >> system: LVM makes it possible to do this, without a reboot,
> >> without
On 11/30/2015 03:07 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/30/2015 01:06 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
You can add a PV to encrypt the system without rebooting.
... should note that you'll have to shrink at least one of your volumes,
though. The encrypted PV that you create will be slightly smaller than
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 11:49 -0800, William Biggs wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 03:29 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 23:01 -0800, William Biggs wrote:
> > > I would like to know know to remove compiz from mate desktop in
> > > fedora 23
> >
> > What's wrong with "dnf e
I am pulling a bunch of recordings off my android phone. I found
simple-mtpfs to be able to use 'cp -a' to actually copy the files and
preserve their date information.
Now I want to rename these files, which are all lectures to have the
date of creation/lastmodified in the file name. All my
If you use Yumex, just open it, look up for Compiz and select it for
deletion. Then apply and see if you're okay with the options (like
other stuff it will remove and so). Then apply, write your password
and leave the programme alone. ☺
Hope this helps!
Sylvia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
On 11/30/2015 03:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am pulling a bunch of recordings off my android phone. I found
simple-mtpfs to be able to use 'cp -a' to actually copy the files and
preserve their date information.
Now I want to rename these files, which are all lectures to have the
date of cr
On 11/30/2015 03:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Now I want to rename these files, which are all lectures to have the
date of creation/lastmodified in the file name.
Does the date require a specific format?
You could:
mv "$file" "$file-$(stat -c %y "$file")"
Or if you want to define your own
On 11/30/2015 07:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/30/2015 03:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Now I want to rename these files, which are all lectures to have the
date of creation/lastmodified in the file name.
Does the date require a specific format?
You could:
mv "$file" "$file-$(stat -
Ranjan Maitra writes:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:38:50 -0500 Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> In this case, this is not possible. /boot cannot be encrypted. If you have
> one / partition, and /boot lives on it, it cannot be encrypted.
Thanks! But I was talking about encrypting the /home partition which
Heinz Diehl writes:
Automatically introducing complexity into 95% of the users systems just
because it could
be useful some day is, quite frankly, embarassing. It makes sense the
other way 'round: complexity adds to the diffculties when
having to handle data operations (backup, encryption, tra
Here is what works:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 20 42`;
do
file="Voice "0${i}.m4a
mv "$file" "$file-$(stat -c %y "$file"|awk '{print $1}')"
done
I suspect there are better ways, but this will do for now...
thanks
On 11/30/2015 07:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/30
On 11/30/2015 04:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
You could:
mv "$file" "$file-$(stat -c %y "$file")"
Not quite as the script:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 20 42`;
do
file="Voice "0${i}.m4a
mv $file "$file-$(stat -c %y "$file")"
done
is producing:
mv: target ‘Voice 03
Well, I discovered a kind of big issue with 23 after all ...
My google account dissipated from California. When I try to add it, it
wont authenticate anymore and gives me a message about a resource on
Google's web site not being available anymore. Unfortunately, the
screen wont let me copy a
On 11/27/15 15:05, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a fedora22 SuperMicro system operating as a mail server that
> has no need to have the CPU throttled. I'm having trouble figuring out
> how to disable the throttling. There also doesn't appear to be any
> recent threads discussing this previously.
>
>
On 11/30/2015 05:05 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Such as during the grub -> grub2 transition, when a larger spare chunk
of space was needed, after the MBR, to accomodate the larger bootloader.
Yes, but only for systems that had /boot on md RAID1. In the context of
a discussion about "95% of use
On 11/30/2015 07:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
So where is the case for not using it, exactly?
It's one more layer of abstraction to confuse newer users when things go
wrong.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
60 matches
Mail list logo
