Re: VEry OT Ruby

On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent: >> Changing ISP is not an option. > > You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise > against it. When you have an independent service, you can have your own > domain, and without the extor

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Dan Mossor wrote: > These <4GiB transfers sometimes take close to 3 to 4 hours using NFS, and it > is a Gigabit network. I regularly transfer files of 1 or 2 GB over NFS between two fairly slow 32-bit machines on a 100Mbps Ethernet. Takes 2 or 3 minutes typically (

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > If you do it this way, it should > really not matter much which transfer protocol you are using. NFS, > samba, ftp, scp, rsync, even http --- they should all give you roughly > the same (fast) performance > I disagree. Different protocols

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On 03/04/14 22:23, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > If you do it this way, it should > really not matter much which transfer protocol you are using. NFS, > samba, ftp, scp, rsync, even http --- they should

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

03/03/2014 06:09 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/03/2014 05:40 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: # Blacklist order allow,deny allow from all deny from 85.25.196.141 deny from 85.25.226.154 deny from 146.185.239.100 deny from 185.4.227.194 deny from 192.99.2.75 I'm not familiar with thi

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > So, you are offering advice to use a protocol which may or may not exist > and be available now? And of which you have no current experience? > I'm offering a pointer to check whether Samba.org currently supports NETBEUI or not, based on my p

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > So, you are offering advice to use a protocol which may or may not exist > and be available now? I'm asking the samba devs right now to learn something in the process (current status of NETBEUI support in Samba 4.x), and to lower your anxiety

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

hello ed, On 03/04/14 20:33, Ed Greshko wrote: <<>> > So, you are offering advice to use a protocol which may or > may not exist and be available now? And of which you have > no current experience? > Wouldn't it make better sense to cite performance comparisons > of the various common protoc

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Mar 4, 2014 8:32 AM, "Pete Travis" wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 2014 7:58 PM, "Dan Mossor" wrote: > > . > > > > When the DVD is built, I pull the updates across the local network to my machine and build the DVD there. These <4GiB transfers sometimes take close to 3 to 4 hours using NFS, and it is a

F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

I am having trouble getting F20 to work with the scanning function of my HP3050. hplip and hp-setup are installed, and the printing function works fine, but the "Simple scan" and Xsane are not able to see the scanner. Running hplip-3.14.1.run returns a F20 not supported error, stating that I ca

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/14 11:58, Paul Erickson wrote: > I am having trouble getting F20 to work with the scanning function > of my HP3050. hplip and hp-setup are installed, and the printing > function works fine, but the "Simple scan" and Xsane are not able > to s

Re: [389-users] Kerberized admin server

On 03/04/2014 09:16 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: hello I know there use to be a document on doing this because I did it several years ago at a previous job but I cant seem to find it in the documentation now. I'm trying to make the the admin server accept Kerberos authentication. From which a

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 04/03/14 09:11 AM, Mark Haney wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/14 11:58, Paul Erickson wrote: I am having trouble getting F20 to work with the scanning function of my HP3050. hplip and hp-setup are installed, and the printing function works fine, but the "Simpl

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the reply. I used Simple scan as it worked fine on my > previous FC16 build. I am using MATE for a desktop. Thanks again > for the response. > No problem. Honestly, I've never had Simple Scan work for me. I have a H

Re: [389-users] Kerberized admin server

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 03/04/2014 09:16 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: >> >> hello >> I know there use to be a document on doing this because I did it >> several years ago at a previous job but I cant seem to find it in the >> documentation now. >> >> I'm trying

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 04/03/14 09:30 AM, Mark Haney wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply. I used Simple scan as it worked fine on my previous FC16 build. I am using MATE for a desktop. Thanks again for the response. No problem. Honestly, I've never had Simple Sca

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On 03/04/14 22:48, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko > wrote: > > So, you are offering advice to use a protocol which may or may not exist > and be available now? > > > I'm asking the samba devs right now to learn something

Re: [389-users] Kerberized admin server

I'm fairly sure the admin server does support or at least did at one time, because I know Ive done it before at some of my previous jobs. It may requier saslauthd to work but I cant remember the details. Its been a few years since I did it last and I can't find the article that explains how to do i

best, up-to-date, *detailed* coverage of systemd?

hi, i'm giving a talk on systemd to my local LUG later this week and, rather than a superficial coverage, i really want to dig into it, so i'm looking for the best, comprehensive coverage of that system. i'm aware of lennart's 20-part series over at 0pointer.de, as well as URLs like: * https

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 03/04/2014 11:30 AM, Mark Haney wrote: > >>> >> Hi Mark, > >> Thanks for the reply. I used Simple scan as it worked fine on my >> previous FC16 build. I am using MATE for a desktop. Thanks again >> for the response. > > > No problem. Honestly, I've never had Simple Scan work for me. I have

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/14 13:50, Kevin Martin wrote: > Hmm, it's interesting that you say that you can't get Simple Scan > to work for you as I've had the *least* amount of problems with > Simple Scan than any of the other scanner software (with a Canon > Pixma

Re: best, up-to-date, *detailed* coverage of systemd?

Hi, Robert, These links talk mostly about systemd from the administrative point of view, , I believe you intend to focus on it, and this is perfectly fine. In case you intend to talk about implementation, DBUS underlying layer, etc, I would suggest considering mentioning the new kdbus, which is

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:50:52PM -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 03/04/2014 11:30 AM, Mark Haney wrote: > > > >>> > >> Hi Mark, > > > >> Thanks for the reply. I used Simple scan as it worked fine on my > >> previous FC16 build. I am using MATE for a desktop. Thanks again > >> for the response.

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/14 14:45, Fred Smith wrote: > > I've never used anything BUT simplescan on 3 different scanners > (none of 'em are HP), an ancient SCSI scanner, a Brother MFC device > at work, and a new2-ish Epson at home. Each on a different > version/di

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 03/04/2014 01:54 PM, Mark Haney wrote: > > > On 03/04/14 14:45, Fred Smith wrote: > > >> I've never used anything BUT simplescan on 3 different scanners >> (none of 'em are HP), an ancient SCSI scanner, a Brother MFC device >> at work, and a new2-ish Epson at home. Each on a different >> ver

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 03/04/2014 11:54 AM, Mark Haney wrote: Surely it being a USB device the system can find it? Is dmesg seeing it? Just because the system finds it doesn't mean that the program recognizes it. And, BTW, his name is Fred, not Shirley. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: error open ports

On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 12:25 -0500, William Biggs wrote: > I install chrip for my ham radio but every tip . I try to read the radio > I get this error on all ports . How do I set the Permission for the > software for the user I'm using ? > could not open port /dev/ttyUSB0: [Errno 13] Permission deni

Re: best, up-to-date, *detailed* coverage of systemd?

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Rami Rosen wrote: > Hi, Robert, > > These links talk mostly about systemd from the administrative point of > view, , I believe you intend to focus on it, and this is perfectly > fine. > > In case you intend to talk about implementation, DBUS underlying > layer, etc, I would su

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

On 03/03/2014 10:47 PM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 03 March 2014, Dan Thurman sent: It looks to me like a successful indirect connection? The following is taken from /var/log/httpd/access_log 185.4.227.194 - - [03/Mar/2014:07:27:49 -0800] "GET http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSES

Re: best, up-to-date, *detailed* coverage of systemd?

On 04.03.2014 22:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Rami Rosen wrote: > >> Hi, Robert, >> >> These links talk mostly about systemd from the administrative point of >> view, , I believe you intend to focus on it, and this is perfectly >> fine. >> >> In case you intend to talk about

Re: best, up-to-date, *detailed* coverage of systemd?

FOSDEM - Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting 2 - systemd: The First Two Years 0http://video.fosdem.org/2013/maintracks/Janson/ 1'systemd,_Two_Years_Later.webm' 3 . - systemd in Debian http://video.fosdem.org/2013/crossdistro/

Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

I just did one of those 1000-pending updates on my Fedora 20 installation, and suddenly Firefox is no longer working. It worked fine before. When I run it from console, I see the error: (process:13166): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed This happe

Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On 03/05/14 07:42, Bill Oliver wrote: > > I just did one of those 1000-pending updates on my Fedora 20 installation, > and suddenly Firefox is no longer working. It worked fine before. When I > run it from console, I see the error: > > (process:13166): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: asse

Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/05/14 07:42, Bill Oliver wrote: I just did one of those 1000-pending updates on my Fedora 20 installation, and suddenly Firefox is no longer working. It worked fine before. When I run it from console, I see the error: (process:13166): GLib-CRITI

Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On 03/05/14 07:52, Bill Oliver wrote: > Are you running Gnome or KDE? I'm running the KDE scientific spin... KDE. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https:/

Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On 03/05/14 07:52, Bill Oliver wrote: > I'm running the KDE scientific spin... You may want to try manually deleting your cache -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription option

Critical bug in GnuTLS

http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/03/critical-crypto-bug-leaves-linux-hundreds-of-apps-open-to-eavesdropping/ Putting aside the slightly hysterical tone of the article, this is appears to be a real bug with potentially serious implications. I see that Koji has an updated rpm for F21 and wonder

hardware TPM module - install?

What is the current feeling on installing an optional hardware TPM module on a motherboard that has a header for it? My most recent Asus motherboard has a header for a $20 TPM module. From what I understand this module has a hardware random number generator that can spit out 10's of kbits/sec of

[Solved -- sorta] Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/05/14 07:52, Bill Oliver wrote: I'm running the KDE scientific spin... You may want to try manually deleting your cache Nope. No joy. However, I noticed that your error messages mentioned GnomeProgram (whatever that is). So, on a wild gu

Re: Critical bug in GnuTLS

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:01:04AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/03/critical-crypto-bug-leaves-linux-hundreds-of-apps-open-to-eavesdropping/ > Putting aside the slightly hysterical tone of the article, this is > appears to be a real bug with potentially se

Re: VEry OT Ruby

On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent: Changing ISP is not an option. You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise against it. When you have an independent service, you can have yo

Re: VEry OT Ruby

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote: On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent: > > Changing ISP is not an option. > You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise > against it. When y

Re: VEry OT Ruby

On 03/04/2014 05:30 PM, Roger wrote: How does one have an independent service? Where can I get comprehensive info on this or even running without an ISP. How do I server a CMS web site from another ISP while using the current one that they will not change from? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hos

Re: Critical bug in GnuTLS

On 04/03/14 08:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:01:04AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/03/critical-crypto-bug-leaves-linux-hundreds-of-apps-open-to-eavesdropping/ Putting aside the slightly hysterical tone of the article, this is app

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:28:42PM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/04/2014 11:54 AM, Mark Haney wrote: > >Surely it being a USB device the system can find it? Is dmesg seeing it? > > Just because the system finds it doesn't mean that the program > recognizes it. And, BTW, his name is Fred, not Sh

Re: [Solved -- sorta] Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On 03/05/14 08:49, Bill Oliver wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 03/05/14 07:52, Bill Oliver wrote: >>> I'm running the KDE scientific spin... >> >> You may want to try manually deleting your cache >> >> > > Nope. No joy. However, I noticed that your error messages mentio

Re: [Solved -- sorta] Re: Has Firefox suddenly stopped working for you folk?

On 3/4/2014 9:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 03/05/14 08:49, Bill Oliver wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> On 03/05/14 07:52, Bill Oliver wrote: I'm running the KDE scientific spin... >>> >>> You may want to try manually deleting your cache >>> >>> >> >> Nope. No joy.

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

Dan Mossor writes: > When the DVD is built, I pull the updates across the local network to > my machine and build the DVD there. These <4GiB transfers sometimes > take close to 3 to 4 hours using NFS, and it is a Gigabit > network. Have you checked the bandwidth usage during these transfers? Th

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

"eoconno...@gmail.com" writes: > What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... > > - Reply message - > From: "Mark Haney" > To: > Subject: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt? > Date: Mon, Mar 3, 2014 11:59 am > > > > > On 03/03/14 11:42, Dan Thurman wrote: >> >> It loo

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

lee writes: > Could someone please explain why/how this may be considered as an attack > or at least as something bad? Someone requesting an URL from a web > server that doesn´t serve this URL --- or doesn´t serve the specified > domain at all --- could be caused by incorrect responses from name

Re: VEry OT Ruby

On 03/05/2014 12:45 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote: On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent: > > Changing ISP is not an option. > You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fa

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:48:47 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > I'm asking the samba devs right now to learn something in the process > (current status of NETBEUI support in Samba 4.x), and to lower your > anxiety. ;) So? What did the samba devs say? Did they even bother to answer the question? Best,

Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems

On 4 Mar 2014 at 20:58, Fred Smith wrote: Date sent: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:58:17 -0500 From: Fred Smith To: Community support for Fedora users Subject:Re: F20 - HP3050 scanning problems Send reply to: Community support for

Re: Critical bug in GnuTLS

On 05.03.2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3413/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc20 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 Do they fix the bug? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: Critical bug in GnuTLS

On 03/05/14 14:18, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 05.03.2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3413/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc20 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 > Do they fix the bug? > Well The article pointed t

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > So? What did the samba devs say? Did they even bother to answer the > question? > > Best, :-) Here's the update: the last kernel on top of which you can run NETBEUI is 2.4 [1] Nobody seems to have ported the required kernel patches to 3.

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On 03/05/14 14:54, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Here's the update: the last kernel on top of which you can run NETBEUI > is 2.4 So, aren't you happy you've helped the OP avoid doing the research only to learn it wouldn't have helped him at all? :-) -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and se

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > So, aren't you happy you've helped the OP avoid doing the research only to > learn it wouldn't have helped him at all? :-) I'm happy of having done the research to learn something myself and educate others in the process. All without the need