Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations, and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its possible I don't know the solution/configuration requirement to fulfil

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux box which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent pcs to access the Internet, say if A,B,C,D is using inte

Re: Gnome-rdp

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 10:52 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > In all my years I can't recall ever coming across that behaviorand > it doesn't make much sense to me that a utility/tool meant to query > the DNS would do this. dig also doesn't. > > If you can recall what version did this I'd be intere

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, jdow wrote: On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: Is he trying to establish some traffic management or a means of assuring at least one person is bored enough that she'll take care of the company's business while the men are st

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux box which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent pcs to access the

RE: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Jatin K Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:00 AM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections On 06/28/2012 01:1

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 2012/06/28 00:02, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations, and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its possible I don't know the solutio

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 2012/06/28 00:59, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, jdow wrote: On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: Is he trying to establish some traffic management or a means of assuring at least one person is bored enough that she'll take care of the comp

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote: On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux box which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allo

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 2012/06/28 01:24, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote: On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux box which is working as a

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 01:49 PM, jdow wrote: On 2012/06/28 00:02, Jatin K wrote: On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations, and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its possi

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 04:19 PM, jdow wrote: > About the only semi-feasible means of doing this might be to setup a > virtual lan through a proxy with a limited number of concurrent logins > permitted. What proxy would you recommend? I can't think of one that would proxy *all* protocols. That's why I sug

Re: Catalyst 12.6 drivers

On 06/28/2012 01:49 AM, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:11 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 > wrote: >> These are now available on RPMFusion non free testing repository. It >> installed with no problems for me. >> >> This should remove the watermark, (I've not tested it) >> >> #!/bin/s

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 28 June 2012 11:29, Ed Greshko wrote: > What proxy would you recommend?  I can't think of one that would proxy *all* > protocols.  That's why I suggested the pptp connection.  Seems a bit more > simple to > set upand has the same drawbacks as the earthlink dialup connection > limiter.  :-

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 27 June 2012 07:57, Jatin K wrote: > Dear All > > I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection > for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in > my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to > router. i.e. if I want

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

Hakan Koseoglu wrote: >Doesn't have to be all protocols. The original request only specifies >"internet usage", these days it equals to web usage. It is quite >common to have companies to limit web access with transparent proxies >and a radius server. I can imagine (but not give concrete examples

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

So last day I got around to installing Vista. The last 12 hours have convinced me that this is arguably the worst operating system ever made, and booting back into F17 was bliss. I have not tried Windows 7 very much (only really use Windows at all if Wine will not give me a smooth solution). Reins

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

**Cut myself short: I have not tried Windows 7 very much (only really use Windows at all if Wine will not give me a smooth solution), but I do hope they managed to turn the boat on this disaster of an OS. If not, I frankly do not understand how they can still entertain a customer base. On Thu, Ju

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On Thursday, 28. June 2012. 1.27.10 jdow wrote: > On 2012/06/28 01:24, Jatin K wrote: > > On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote: > >> On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote: > >>> On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: > > well. suppose I've 5 clien

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

Am 28.06.2012 08:27, schrieb Jatin K: >> Seriously? > yes, its my client's requirement .. I can understand its not the way to > go > but he pays me for this ... I'm a service provider .. I have to do what they > said and want to do there is really a differece between service probi

Re: Gnome-rdp

On 06/27/2012 09:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/28/2012 09:50 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> nslookup (or some versions of it) used to honor the /etc/nsswitch.conf file >> so if hosts was defined >> >> hosts: dns file >> >> in /etc/nsswitch.conf, "nslookup risingstar" would return the address (*if*

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 27.06.2012 08:57, Jatin K wrote: > Dear All > > I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection > for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in > my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to > router. i.e. if I want to

RE: Restoring grub after Windows install

Hello: How did you run grub2-install? It is very important to know the error message. Regards. Max. Enviado desde mi PC con Windows 8 De: Christopher Svanefalk Enviado el: jueves, 28 de junio de 2012 8:14:01 Para: Community support for Fedora users Asunto: Re: Restoring grub after

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 04:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote: On 27 June 2012 07:57, Jatin K wrote: Dear All I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent conn

Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

On 06/26/2012 02:29 PM, Jim wrote: On 06/26/2012 02:23 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/26/2012 10:37 AM, Jim wrote: Yes the CD is a Bootable CD. If you read the CD from within WindowsXP it will read the the files on the CD. Two questions: first, have you tried booting a different computer with t

Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

On 06/26/2012 02:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/26/2012 11:29 AM, Jim wrote: Yes the CD will boot off another computer. OK, that's one possibility eliminated. Always good to make sure. And Dell isn't going to be much help with a old computer and me installing Linux, they will only give ad

Re: F17 XDMCP

On 06/26/2012 04:19 PM, Robert Myers wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ken Smith > wrote: Hi, I in danger of making this a rant, but is XDMCP no longer something that Fedora supports? gives? Thanks for any hints and guidance. I have more th

Request for recommendations for dynamic dns daemon

Greetings, I'm trying to configure dynamic dns on my test/backup machine (CentOS 5.8). I'm using Zoneedit DNS. I've been trying to setup ddclient; the error message that I get is: Jun 26 15:20:09 xx ddclient[28467]: WARNING: file /var/cache/ddclient/ddclient.cache, line 3: Invalid Value fo

Re: Fedora crashed at Grub Rescue

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Jim wrote: > On 06/27/2012 08:37 PM, Mark C. Allman wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 18:44 -0400, Jim wrote: >> >>> grub rescue> in fedora 17 . >>> >>> What CD do I use to get into chroot /mnt/sysimage ,F17 Live CD ?? >>> >> I used the "Fedora 17 Desk

Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

And Dell isn't going to be much help with a old computer and me installing Linux, they will only give advice on Windows, and the CHARGE you for it. I don't expect anything less from Dell and their Technical Support division!..LoL! Note that Dell does do stuff to support Linux. Matt Domsch ha

Well-hidden yum feature in fc17

I noted that my upgrade of fc17 was running very slowly this morning. I was getting only about 65-68kB download, and things were pretty slow. Since this is a regular thing, I checked a few things, and found out that the upgrade was going over IPv6! It was slow because my connection with a 2nd IS

Evolution loses its data.

Plaform: Fedora 17 x64 Evolution loses its data and launches the Setup Assistant. Upon reboot everything is OK. I don't like Windows because of its poor performances but I am getting tired of Linux utilities bugs. Too much is too much. I wish Fedora secondary programs were developed with the s

Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.f

Re: Evolution loses its data.

On 06/29/2012 07:05 AM, quicksort wrote: > Plaform: Fedora 17 x64 > > Evolution loses its data and launches the Setup Assistant. > Upon reboot everything is OK. I don't use evolution. But, I do play with it from time to time. I don't understand from your description what data is being lost, when

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:27:25 -0400 Jim wrote: > Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? I've been using a USB3 external backup drive with no problems since fedora 16 (which is around the time I got a new system that had USB3 ports in it). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

> Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? I thinks no problem, because i've been use Harddisk Portable (support USB-3) it's work very well. -- http://mafatahna.web.id -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On 06/28/2012 08:42 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:27:25 -0400 Jim wrote: Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? I've been using a USB3 external backup drive with no problems since fedora 16 (which is around the time I got a new system that had USB3 ports in it). Thanks for the

Software Update....

Have a bit of an issue. Not sure how serious it is, but I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. Here's the skinny: I "Check For Updates" and it shows me that there's 1 update to install. The name of the update is called: "Collada 3D Import & Export Libraries" openCOLLADA-0-12.sv

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:48:09 -0400 Jim wrote: > I would imagine that those 3.0 ports are backward compatible with USB-2 > devices. Yep, but you won't notice any speed improvement without a USB3 driver to plug into it (and they are a lot faster). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

> Yep, but you won't notice any speed improvement without a > USB3 driver to plug into it (and they are a lot faster). for speed transfer i don't know because my portable disk support USB-3 but my laptop don't support USB-3 (vey old laptop):D -- http://mafatahna.web.id -- users mailing list use

Re: Evolution loses its data.

On 29.06.2012 01:05, quicksort wrote: > > Plaform: Fedora 17 x64 > > Evolution loses its data and launches the Setup Assistant. > Upon reboot everything is OK. > > I don't like Windows because of its poor performances but > I am getting tired of Linux utilities bugs. Too much is > too much. I wish

Re: Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

Well "Ed" unlike some people I would GREATLY appreciate it if you would continue to lend assistance to this mailing list, I have found most of your answers to be "right" in the situations they were presented in. Until I become a Linux "master" I'm going to need the minds of folks just like you

Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

A local FTTH ISP in Buenos Aires has showed some interest in becoming a local mirror/repo for Fedora (currently, there is none in Argentina). However, the person in charge tells me he doesn't have 1.2TB to spare. So I did the math and found that F16 dir is 111G, F17 is 113G. F16 updates /pub/fedor

Re: Software Update....

On 06/29/2012 08:53 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: > Have a bit of an issue. Not sure how serious it is, but I'm hoping someone can > point me in the right direction. Here's the skinny: > > I "Check For Updates" and it shows me that there's 1 update to install. > The name of the update is called:

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On 06/28/2012 05:47 PM, Muhammad A. Fatahna wrote: Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? I thinks no problem, because i've been use Harddisk Portable (support USB-3) it's work very well. You can plug any USB 1.1 or USB 2 device into a USB 3 port and it'll work...but at whatever speed the de

Re: F16 rocks. Thanks.

On 06/27/2012 04:02 PM, Hiisi wrote: On 27 June 2012 20:05, linux guy wrote: I've been using F16 since before Christmas and I must say that it has become a very polished and powerful release. Kudos to those who have worked so hard on it. We don't thank you people enough. Your work is great

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > You won't get USB 3 speeds > without a USB 3 driver for the port and I don't think any of the > current drivers are USB 3. I could be wrong there. > Apparently the drivers are there September 10th, 2009, 06:44 GMT Linux Kernel 2.6.31 H

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 06/27/2012 05:03 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: On 27/06/12 21:12, James Wilkinson wrote: Have you considered installing Windows in a virtual machine, where it can’t do any damage? James. Widows even in a cd sleeve can still do damage. Paper cut, hurts like a bizatch. LoL!good one! EG

RE: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

Hello:I think you don't have to créate a mirror for old and unsupported versions. For more information, you can visit this link: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/ch08s04.html A mirror in Argentina would be very helpful for all the users here in sout

Re: Software Update....

On 06/28/2012 09:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/29/2012 08:53 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: Have a bit of an issue. Not sure how serious it is, but I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. Here's the skinny: I "Check For Updates" and it shows me that there's 1 update to insta

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 06/27/2012 08:00 PM, Roger wrote: Deceptively simple and elegant solution, apply the DWPGA rule. Delete Windows, problem goes away. Solved problems on our computers. R Am 28.06.2012 01:30, schrieb Dave Ihnat: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:16:28PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: The licens

Re: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Maximiliano Marín Bustos wrote: > Hello: > I think you don't have to créate a mirror for old and unsupported versions. > For more information, you can visit this link: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/ch08s04.html > >

Re: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

On 06/29/2012 10:41 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > However, I decided to ask to this list about the space requirements > after reading the following: > > /// > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring#How_can_someone_become_a_public_mirror.3F If you read further down in the document yo

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/28/2012 02:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 02:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote: well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux box which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent pcs to ac

Re: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > If you read further down in the document you'll see this > > "You may exclude any content you desire, such as architectures, using an > EXCLUDES file." Well call me stupid then but the 1.2TB statement at the top clearly is misleading. I f

Re: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

On 06/29/2012 10:55 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> If you read further down in the document you'll see this >> >> "You may exclude any content you desire, such as architectures, using an >> EXCLUDES file." > Well call me stupid then but the

Re: Would-be local mirror in Argentina...

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Notice the use of the word "could"not "will" or "must". > > :-) You could have fixed the paragraph on the wiki by now ;-) FC -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

If you think Windows Vista was bad, and Windows 7 sucked, then check this out! And mind you I'm not a "Windows" basher at large, I just feel that they've never really been "about the consumer" but more "about the cash"I understand most corporations using it, for it's hardware-wide compatibi

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 06/28/2012 08:15 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: **Cut myself short: I have not tried Windows 7 very much (only really use Windows at all if Wine will not give me a smooth solution), but I do hope they managed to turn the boat on this disaster of an OS. If not, I frankly do not understan

Re: Evolution loses its data.

On 06/28/2012 08:58 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 29.06.2012 01:05, quicksort wrote: Plaform: Fedora 17 x64 Evolution loses its data and launches the Setup Assistant. Upon reboot everything is OK. I don't like Windows because of its poor performances but I am getting tired of Linux utilit

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 6/28/2012 11:55 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: > If you think Windows Vista was bad, and Windows 7 sucked, then check > this out! And mind you I'm not a "Windows" basher at large, I just feel > that they've never really been "about the consumer" but more "about the > cash"I understand most

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 06/29/2012 12:13 AM, David wrote: On 6/28/2012 11:55 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: If you think Windows Vista was bad, and Windows 7 sucked, then check this out! And mind you I'm not a "Windows" basher at large, I just feel that they've never really been "about the consumer" but more "abo

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 6/29/2012 12:16 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: > > On 06/29/2012 12:13 AM, David wrote: >> On 6/28/2012 11:55 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: >>> If you think Windows Vista was bad, and Windows 7 sucked, then check >>> this out! And mind you I'm not a "Windows" basher at large, I just feel >

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 09:21 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > I agree the OP's client has got a weird idea as to limiting access, > but perhaps they feel their uplink is too small to handle more > connections. There is a lot of education that's required here with the > client. But that's never going to

Re: Restoring grub after Windows install

On 06/29/2012 12:31 AM, David wrote: On 6/29/2012 12:16 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: On 06/29/2012 12:13 AM, David wrote: On 6/28/2012 11:55 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote: If you think Windows Vista was bad, and Windows 7 sucked, then check this out! And mind you I'm not a "Windows" bas

Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

On 06/29/2012 12:32 PM, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 09:21 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: >> I agree the OP's client has got a weird idea as to limiting access, >> but perhaps they feel their uplink is too small to handle more >> connections. There is a lot of education that's required here with

Re: Request for recommendations for dynamic dns daemon

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 14:34 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > I'm trying to configure dynamic dns on my test/backup machine (CentOS > 5.8). I'm using Zoneedit DNS. > > I've been trying to setup ddclient; the error message that I get is: > Jun 26 15:20:09 xx ddclient[28467]: WARNING: file > /var/cach

Re: Well-hidden yum feature in fc17

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 18:03 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > It looks as if yum chooses IPv6 sources when available, over IPv4. Who > knew? There will be a few things that prefer it, because it's supposed to be better... ;-) and it's the replacement for IPv4 ("replacement" not "fallback"). When tr

Re: Fedora 17 and USB 3.0

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jim wrote: > On 06/28/2012 08:42 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:27:25 -0400 >> Jim wrote: >> >>> Is Fedora 17 compatible with USB-3.0 ? >> >> I've been using a USB3 external backup drive with no problems >> since fedora 16 (which is around the

Re: Evolution loses its data.

On 29.06.2012, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > Use Thunderbird, it's more stable at last in my case. Don't know if this is important, but if he uses Evolution as an Outlook replacement (this is what I do at work, to avoid using Wind*ws), Thunderbird won't fit his needs, because there is no mapi or