Re: RAID adventures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Konstantin Svist wrote: > Here's the question, then: am I royally screwed or is my data still > there? How do I recover? Did you run resize2fs? Gabriel - -- // Gabriel VLASIU // // OpenGPG-KeyID : 0xE684206E // OpenGPG-F

Re: RAID adventures

On 07/18/2010 11:59 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: >> Here's the question, then: am I royally screwed or is my data still >> there? How do I recover? > Did you run resize2fs? No, not yet. I know it's the "next step" after growing the array, but I thought I'd re-do the chunks first. -- users maili

Re: RAID adventures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Konstantin Svist wrote: > No, not yet. I know it's the "next step" after growing the array, but I > thought I'd re-do the chunks first. I'm not sure but I think you have to run resize2fs before trying to mount your partition.

Re: User password trouble - SOLVED -

On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 12:32 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > The keyboard has failed! > > Typing the password characters after the root prompt shows one key > does nothing, not even a blank space! :-D I got bitten by the same problem. Too bad I didn't see this thread earlier. I had cha

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On 7/19/10, Suvayu Ali > wrote: I have a copy of the "buggy" 64 bit flash(10.0.45), and it works with > the fedora version of FF 3.6 very well. I am having a problem with _all_ > my plugins when I use the tarball. I guess I'll have to give up my wish > to test the beta release of FF. :-\ > It's n

Re: RAID adventures

On 07/19/2010 12:10 AM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Konstantin Svist wrote: > >> No, not yet. I know it's the "next step" after growing the array, but I >> thought I'd re-do the chunks first. > I'm not sure but I think you have

Re: RAID adventures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Konstantin Svist wrote: > The "I'm not sure" part kind of worries me :) Well, this is way people usually do a full backup before. :-) Gabriel - -- // Gabriel VLASIU // // OpenGPG-KeyID : 0xE684206E // OpenGPG-Fingerprint

Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On Monday 19 July 2010 12:17 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > So yes, the software "works well" in much the same way that "an unpatched > Windows XP works well" but leaves you open to compromise. Note the key > sentence here: "There are reports that this vulnerability is being actively > exploited

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 7/19/10, Suvayu Ali > wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 12:17 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > > So yes, the software "works well" in much the same way that "an unpatched > > Windows XP works well" but leaves you open to compromise. Note the key > > sentence here: "There are reports that this vul

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise? >> > If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for >> > this discussion) >> > > I think FlashBlock would be a fairly good compromise. If

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 19/07/10 09:18, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> I think FlashBlock would be a fairly good compromise. If you're using >> FlashBlock, you can safely wander around the web knowing that no flash you >> do not explicitly authorize will be running. As for NoScript, I'm not sure >> that it adds value for this

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/18/2010 09:48 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> I think the best way for me to improve this list is to provide help >> where it's needed and try to avoid tedious arguments. I don't think >> that anyone made me the hall monitor. >> >> In the

Installation @core packages list

Good morning, I need to double check that a fresh vps fedora installation have installed only the @core packages. Anybody can point me to the list of packages installed by fedora for the @core packages group ? The only relevant information I have been able to find is here http://fedoraproject.org/w

Installation @core packages list

Marco Vittorini Orgeas gmail.com> writes: > > Good morning, > I need to double check that a fresh vps fedora installation have > installed only the @core packages. > Anybody can point me to the list of packages > installed by fedora for the @core packages group ? > ... > Is possible to check wit

Installation @core packages list

JB gmail.com> writes: > > yum grouplist hidden > yum groupinfo core > yum -v groupinfo core JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 19 July 2010 09:18, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >>> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise? >>> >  If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for >>> >  this discussion) >>> > >> I think

Re: Installation @core packages list

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:18:28 + (UTC) JB wrote: > JB gmail.com> writes: > > > > > yum grouplist hidden > > yum groupinfo core > > > yum -v groupinfo core > JB > > > > Hi, "yum grouplist hidden" shows as installed only the "system tools" group. Also issuing a "yum list installed" and

Installation @core packages list

Marco Vittorini Orgeas gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:18:28 + (UTC) > JB gmail.com> wrote: > > > JB gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > yum grouplist hidden > > > yum groupinfo core > > > > > yum -v groupinfo core > > JB > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > "yum grouplist hi

Re: List mail/archives, encodings

--- On Sun, 7/18/10, Tim wrote: > From: Tim > Subject: Re: List mail/archives, encodings > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 10:15 PM > On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 10:15 -0700, > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > Thankfully, > > I have not seen any more mail with en

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 17 July 2010 21:43, Rex Dieter wrote: > Chris Rouch wrote: > > >> Is it possible to configure kde to use nm-applet instead? > > Yes, > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE/Using_nm_applet_instead_of_knetworkmanager Thanks. That mostly works - I had to move the nm-applet.desktop file to /home

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 17 July 2010 21:59, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Chris Rouch wrote: > >> * it's not possible to set networking to connect automatically and be >> available for everyone >> * the wireless icon does not show the signal strength. at least not >> without a magnifying glass > > Yes, it is possible

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

> I think FlashBlock would be a fairly good compromise. If you're using > FlashBlock, you can safely wander around the web knowing that no flash you > do not explicitly authorize will be running. Unfortunately FlashBlock is useless. I tested it on a malicious swf file, and the firefox immediately

Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot

On 07/18/2010 04:24 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote: >> From: "Darr" >> On Saturday, 17 July, 2010 @23:56 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed: >> >>> I used the rescue disk typed: chroot /mnt/sysimage >>> then dracut -f /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r) and got the >>> fallowing answer: >>> find:'/lib/

Re: RAID adventures

Konstantin Svist wrote: > so I sized it down a bit: > # mdadm --grow -z 293033472 --backup-file=/root/grow_md0_size.bak /dev/md0 And there is your error. You resized the device without first resizing the fileystem. The filesystem is *in* the device. So if you want to enlarge, you enlarge the dev

Re: List mail/archives, encodings

Tim: >> I don't use the webmail service, it could be a cause of your >> problem. I merely send messages to the list using a yahoo >> address in my "from" field. I receive mail sent to another >> address, that has nothing to do with Yahoo. Antonio Olivares: > How do you get to do this? I would

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His > problem has been going on forever. > Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude mails in private? I don't think it is a valid excuse. Sorry. > Do you believe that there's an

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Paul W. Frields > wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:13 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> > The prerequisite is that Red Hat employees have some common sense >> > themselves... Of course, we all know that Fedor

Re: Howto script "sudo"?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/2010 08:51 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to pass "sudo" the root-password in some way (I would > prefer plaintext)? > > The reason is I use an umts-connection utility which has to run as > root, and I don't want to

Re: Grub2 question

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:54 PM, JD wrote: >  On 07/18/2010 12:13 PM, Tom H wrote: >> >> I have just installed grub2 in an f13 vbox (built through an f13 live >> cd install) and it looks to me like that: >> (1) grub1 is still in control and the mbr is untouched >> (2) you can just uninstall grub2

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> >> you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His >> problem has been going on forever. >> > > Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude mails in private?  I don't > think

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400 Tom H wrote: > I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora. Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever". The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find it incredibly inconvenient. I could swear the main driving force behind grub over lilo

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400 > Tom H wrote: > >> I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora. > > Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever". > The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find > it incredibly inconv

XPCOM

Hi all... Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch Firefox it gives me the following message: Cannot Load XPCOM. Does anyone have any idea what that's all about and how it can be f

Re: Grub2 question

On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:52:16 am Tom Horsley did opine: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400 > > Tom H wrote: > > I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora. > > Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever". > The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find > it incred

camera won't automount

I'm having problem with one device, a Nikon D90 camera, that won't automount. At some point in the past, I had set something that would cause it to be detected, but the only option offered was to download pictures with Digikam. (At some time in the past, the device notifier would offer options

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 15:50: > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox it gives me the following message:

Re: system-config-display issue Fedora13 RC3

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 23:53 -0500, David A. Paredes Rios wrote: > Hey im having problems when i try to execute system-config-display in > my fedora13 RC3 > The message im gettin is: > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in > >

tune2fs and luks

Can someone set me right with tune2fs and luks encrypted drives. Have googled but cannot find an example. Please don't say man luks. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https:

RE: XPCOM

> Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 > 15:50: > > Hi all... > > > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop > > to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox > it gives me the fo

Re: Error No matching domain found for 5001 in sssd_nss.log

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2010 01:08 AM, John Nissley wrote: > I will admit that getting fedora 13 to authenticate against my dirsrv > ldap server has been an interesting experience. I still do not think I > have it right since getent passwd does not display the lda

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb boeing.com> writes: > > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to FC13. All seemed to go > flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch Firefox it gives me the following message: > > Cannot Load XPCOM. > > Does anyone have

Re: XPCOM

Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 16:19: > > >> Smith, Herb ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 19/07/2010 >> 15:50: >>> Hi all... >>> >>> Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop >>> to >> FC13. All seemed to go

Re: tune2fs and luks

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 15:17:36 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Can someone set me right with tune2fs and luks encrypted drives. > Have googled but cannot find an example. > Please don't say man luks. You need to have it luks opened first. You need to reference the device by the device mapper nam

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several > times now. It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current grub, but at least on ubuntu, if you modify the grub.cfg file directly you are gonn

Re: DVD writing oddity

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 22:45 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 11:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 16:01 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Recompiled them to use

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

Tom Horsley wrote: > Out of curiosity I downloaded the GPLed source code for the > firmware in my new Netgear WNR3500L router. The first thing > I see is the build instructions which start with: > > 1. This package has been built successfully on Fedora Core 2. > Compiling this packa

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On 07/19/2010 12:17 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On 7/19/10, *Suvayu Ali* > wrote: > > I have a copy of the "buggy" 64 bit flash(10.0.45), and it works with > the fedora version of FF 3.6 very well. I am having a problem with > _all_ > my

Re: Flash on 64 bit systems (was Re: Firefox 4 repo)

On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >>> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise? If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for this discussion) >> I thin

Re: tune2fs and luks

On 19/07/10 15:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > You need to have it luks opened first. You need to reference the device > by the device mapper name. For example: > tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/luks-9cfcdd2a-d2ff-4c30-818c-344764c7cc21 Thanks Bruno. Did the trick. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded F

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:35:37 -0400 Bill Davidsen wrote: > I'm not saying this is good or bad, just that the old development is stable > and > virtually without cost. Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their open source download site, so it might be a bit diffi

Still no kmod for new nvidia

Hello there I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. The release is kmod 2.6.32.16-141 for 195-36.31-1 The driver is 195-36.31-2 I am not sure if it miss labelled or just not the right kmod This does not show up in update

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > > I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to > be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on the RPMfusion mailiing lists. -- user

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

On 07/19/2010 10:00 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >Michael Miles wrote: > >> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. >> > Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really sho

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 07/19/2010 04:52 AM, Chris Rouch wrote: > On 17 July 2010 21:43, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Chris Rouch wrote: >> >> >>> Is it possible to configure kde to use nm-applet instead? >> Yes, >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE/Using_nm_applet_instead_of_knetworkmanager > > Thanks. That mostly work

Re: XPCOM

On 07/19/2010 06:50 AM, Smith, Herb wrote: > Hi all... > > Over the weekend I updated my FC12 installation on my Dell Inspiron laptop to > FC13. All seemed to go flawlessly with one exception. When I try to launch > Firefox it gives me the following message: > > Cannot Load XPCOM. > > Does an

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On Monday 19 July 2010 09:38 AM, JD wrote: > Looks like Adobe has a new 64 bit flash plugin: > Not yet. :( > http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/000/6b3af6c9.html > There is a link there: > Click here for instructions to install Flash Player on a 64-bit > operating system > > Good luck Suvayu The page pres

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

JD wrote: > I tried it. Here's what I get: > > # /usr/bin/knetworkmanager > knetworkmanager(3913): KUniqueApplication: Cannot find the D-Bus session > server: "Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote > application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy > bloc

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their > open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone > wanting to replicate their development environment to do it. > > (Unless maybe there is a ar

Re: F12: Kernel 2.6.32.16-141.fc12.i686.PAE problems with Radeon drivers

Terry Barnaby wrote: > Hi, > > For info, my systems have just been updated with the kernel > 2.6.32.16-141.fc12.i686.PAE. > This is causing problems on two of them that have ATI Radeon cards. There are > occasional Kernel OOPS followed by very slow graphics. What really pisses me off when I sugge

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:27:23 +0300 Jonathan Dieter wrote: > You mean like > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/2 Cool! There is one. I even almost guessed the name :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On 07/18/2010 04:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Out of curiosity I downloaded the GPLed source code for the > firmware in my new Netgear WNR3500L router. The first thing > I see is the build instructions which start with: > >1. This package has been built successfully on Fedora Core 2. >

knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

I'm running F13, fully up to date. This morning I encountered a number of problems. 1) Evolution starts in "Offline" mode, ie it doesn't think there is a Network connection and there is now way to put it online. Thus I can't send or receive emails with it. 2) Firefox starts in "Offline" mode, b

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

On 07/19/2010 08:47 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote: Ok this time I think I have hit a legit issue with SELinux and 1.2.6 RC3. On my workstation to sync up my ldap server with production I take a ldif dump from production and load it into my system with the ldif2db.pl script. For

RE: XPCOM

> -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users- > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:14 PM > To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: XPCOM > > On 07/19/2010 06:50 AM, Smith, Herb wrote: > > H

Re: DVD writing oddity

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:25 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Time to use the > --oh-crap-this-thread-has-gotten-longer-than-the-annoying-option > option. No problem, though I still don't get it. never mind. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscript

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:23 -0600, linux guy wrote: > I'm running F13, fully up to date. > > This morning I encountered a number of problems. > > 1) Evolution starts in "Offline" mode, ie it doesn't think there is a > Network connection and there is now way to put it online. Thus I > can't send

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

On 07/19/2010 09:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:35:37 -0400 > Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> I'm not saying this is good or bad, just that the old development is stable >> and >> virtually without cost. > Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet instead. > In any case, make sure NM is controlling your interface. > > Agreed. What package is nm-applet in ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet > instead. > In any case, make sure NM is controlling your interf

Re: knetworkmanager not ready for prime time yet.

On 07/19/2010 10:30 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > JD wrote: > > >> I tried it. Here's what I get: >> >> # /usr/bin/knetworkmanager >> knetworkmanager(3913): KUniqueApplication: Cannot find the D-Bus session >> server: "Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote >> application did not

Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 14:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > > > > > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet > >

Re: sshd Authentication refused

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:52:51 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, David Highley wrote: > > > From: David Highley > > Subject: Re: sshd Authentication refused > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 7:52 PM > > x¥TmoÚ0þž_qb_ç¼ > > >

Re: [389-users] Users added in group via add member not able to authenticate

For apache, to enforce group member restriction follow below syntax. AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.airius.com/o=Airius?uid Require group cn=Administrators, o=Airius Yours should be: ldap://10.209.22.65:389/ou=People?uid Require group cn=IT, ou=shared,ou=people,dc=ldapser,dc=com More examples and exp

Re: [389-users] Users added in group via add member not able to authenticate

Typo: ldap://10.209.22.65:389/ou=people,dc=ldapser,dc=com?uid On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 16:05 -0400, Prashanth Sundaram wrote: > For apache, to enforce group member restriction follow below syntax. > > AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.airius.com/o=Airius?uid > Require group cn=Administrators, o=Airius > > Y

Re: SSH / permissions problem

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:51:22 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > --- On Wed, 7/14/10, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > > From: Gary Stainburn > > Subject: Re: SSH / permissions problem > > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > > Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 1:57 AM > > x}S飇A艀B򡼬㏄驛Zj

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> >> you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His >> problem has been going on forever. >> > > Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude mails in private?  I don't > think

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 01:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > So, I've sent you abusive and rude mails in private? You can post them > anytime you want That is what you did earlier without an apology and is a breach of netiquette and I have no intention of repeating your mistake > As one of their employees, y

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:09:32 -0400 Marcel Rieux wrote: >>> whack > As one of their employees, you're really a shame to Red Hat, either > for Red Hat letting an employee post all this nonsense, or for asking > an employee to do so. That's way over the top. There is no excuse for your remarks. Yo

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif file there > from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why your ldif file ha

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux wrote: > This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to > add noise to this thread. There are 60 posts currently in this thread. Of those, the count per person is: Marcel Rieux - 20 Rahul Sunderam - 9 Assuming that all posts are equall

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > > > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif > file there from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why > your ldif fil

Re: Firefox 4 repo

On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 21:41 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote: > These are the installed plugins on my system. > > $ lt ~/.mozilla/plugins/ > total 8.0K > drwx--. 2 jallad jallad 4.0K May 28 10:15 moonlight > drwxrwxr-x. 2 jallad jallad 4.0K May 28 10:15 QuakeLive > $ lt /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ > tot

Re: Grub2 question

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400 > Gene Heskett wrote: > >> It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several >> times now. > > It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current > grub, but at least

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Paul Frields wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > It has little to do with the venue, and more to do with the tone > you've brought to it, Marcel. Yeah, of course, the tone! Whenever I try to bring people's attention to matters they'd

Re: Can one now help?

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Marko Vojinovic > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:35:36 +0100 > Subject: Re: Can one now help? > On Sunday, July 18, 2010 23:35:34 Parshwa Murdia wrote: > > Ok, as an aftermath, for educational purposes :-) : > > * The

Re: Preupgrade F11 ---> F12 ?

Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks wrote: > >> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote machine >> which I have no >> physical access to. It has a network connection. I wanted >> to upgrade to >> F12 using preupgrade again, but this time I am afraid I'll >> run into

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to >> add noise to this thread. > > There are 60 posts currently in this thread. > > Of those, the count per person is: > > Marcel

Re: Can one now help?

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Marko Vojinovic > To: Community support for Fedora users > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:57:12 +0100 > Subject: Re: Can one now help? > On Monday, July 19, 2010 04:48:25 JD wrote: > > I wonder why the fedora installer did not create a gpt partitioned

Re: Firefox Beta

john wendel wrote: > I installed the latest Firefox Beta on a 32-bit F11 box, and I'm really > impressed. So, I decided to install it on my 64-bit F13 box. > > The problem - the F13 box is 64-bit only and the Firefox beta seems to > be 32-bit, so I need a set of 32-bit libraries. Since the Firef

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining > that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of > copyright matters is absolutely ridiculous since this replace option > is a basic high school exercise? >

Re: Phone calls from laptop

RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote: > My laptop has a internal modem and RJ-11 connector. I want to connect > the phone line to the laptop and by using head phones I want to make > calls. How to do this? Is there any software available to do this? > Log onto Google Voice and use the help feature. I s

Re: Phone calls from laptop

On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 18:57 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote: > > My laptop has a internal modem and RJ-11 connector. I want to connect > > the phone line to the laptop and by using head phones I want to make > > calls. How to do this? Is there any software available to

Re: virtualization without VMX cpu

solarflow99 wrote: > I have a P-4 2.8Ghz and it doesnt seem to have the VMX instructions > for virtualization. What I notice is KVM uses QEMU for the hypervisor > instead? I can't detach some hardware that I need for the VM to > recognize a USB pluged in, etc. Does anyone know if there is any wa

Re: suspend to RAM and NFS /home

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/16/2010 10:29 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 07/16/2010 03:10 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >>> I have found that I have to use the network init script rather than >>> NetworkManager. NetworkManager tries to unmount all of the NFS file system >>> before sleeping and this h

Re: Gotta love embedded developers...

Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their >> open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone >> wanting to replicate their development environment to do it. >> >

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining >> that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of >> copyright matters is absolutely ridiculous since

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 7/19/2010 4:31 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > [...] > How come a Red Hat employee becomes so ignorant when it comes to > understanding patent issues? > > Buzz off with your stupidities about copyright and patents. It doesn't > help you make a point. I really don't understand how come Red Hat > doesn'

Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, > Michael Miles wrote: >> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. > > Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on > the RP

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 05:01 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > Seems I'll have to answer this one after all... > > What's a software patent is not a copyright on code? How this moves > the discussion forward? Buzz off! > It helps to have some basic understanding of the topic in question before engaging in a d

Re: Who's moderating this forum?

On 07/20/2010 05:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > I think the subject line should be changed to "Who's murdering this > forum?" as that seems to be your only intent. > If anyone is concerned about the behaviour of anyone in this list, feel free to drop a mail to users-owner AT lists.fedor

  1   2   >