Re: how to fsck at boot?

sudo tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/... and it worked. That worked also in this case. Another way is to add fsck.mode=force (eventually also fsck.repair=yes) to the kernel command line parameters. See the man of systemd-fsck. Thank you! -- ___ use

Re: how to fsck at boot?

/dev/... > and it worked. That worked also in this case. Another way is to add fsck.mode=force (eventually also fsck.repair=yes) to the kernel command line parameters. See the man of systemd-fsck. -- francis -- ___ users mailing list -- user

Re: how to fsck at boot?

, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/26/24 17:29, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: The tune2fs command is used to modify the filesystem mount options and settings for ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 10/27/24 7:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: You know it occurred to me that since ext4 is a journaling file system, that fsck would never find anything wrong. That is not necessarily true. There could be filesystem damage that isn't known. If you run `e2fsck -f` on the unmo

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 10/25/24 03:18, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Recovering to fc39, restore gave me a bunch of    restore:: ftruncate: Bad file descrition errors.  Turned out something was corrupt in my Thunderbird directories.  (SMART errors = 0.) So I wanted to do an fsck on my partition

Re: how to fsck at boot?

, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: The tune2fs command is used to modify the filesystem mount options and settings for ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair option specifies that fsck should attempt to

Re: how to fsck at boot?

command is used to modify the filesystem mount options and settings for ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair option specifies that fsck should attempt to automatically repair any issues found during the

Re: how to fsck at boot?

and settings for ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair option specifies that fsck should attempt to automatically repair any issues found during the check. # tune2fs -E force_fsck repair /dev

Re: how to fsck at boot?

file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair option specifies that fsck should attempt to automatically repair any issues found during the check. # tune2fs -E force_fsck repair /dev/mapper/luks-903bc691-a0f0-42bc- aa96

Re: how to fsck at boot?

forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every reboot, while the repair option specifies that fsck should attempt to automatically repair any issues found during the check. # tune2fs -E force_fsck repair /dev/mapper/luks-903bc691-a0f0-42bc- aa96-4233a7edc0e9 tune2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) Usage: tune2fs

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 10/26/24 5:40 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/26/24 17:29, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: The tune2fs command is used to modify the filesystem mount options and settings for ext2, ext3, and ext4 file systems. The option -E force_fsck enables forced filesystem checks (fsck) on every

Re: how to fsck at boot?

to throw that tells fsck to "repair"?  I never found one in "man fsck". -T Thank you! Trying it now. # tune2fs -E force_fsck repair /dev/sdXY https://search.brave.com/search?q=tune2fs+- E+force_fsck+repair&summary=1&summary_og=5ad6fac8ba3b05432c1504 Tune2fs Fo

Re: how to fsck at boot?

-903bc691-a0f0-42bc-aa96-4233a7edc0e9 ext4   950971044 669182320 233408360  75% / # tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/mapper/luks-903bc691-a0f0-42bc- aa96-4233a7edc0e9 It did run.  Took about 10 seconds.  Thank you! Followup question: is there a flag to throw that tells fsck to "repair"

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 10/26/24 4:49 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Followup question: is there a flag to throw that tells fsck to "repair"?  I never found one in "man fsck". That depends on what you mean. It will repair if not run in read-only mode. You can only do it if the file

Re: how to fsck at boot?

669182320 233408360 75% / # tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/mapper/luks-903bc691-a0f0-42bc-aa96-4233a7edc0e9 It did run. Took about 10 seconds. Thank you! Followup question: is there a flag to throw that tells fsck to "repair"? I never found one in "

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On Oct 25, 2024, at 08:15, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > # tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/nvme0n1p4 > tune2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) > tune2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/nvme0n1p4 > /dev/nvme0n1p4 contains a crypto_LUKS file system That is most likely the NVME parti

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 10/25/24 04:24, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/... # tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/nvme0n1p4 tune2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) tune2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/nvme0n1p4 /dev/nvme0n1p4 contains a crypto_LUKS file system -- __

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 25/10/24 9:18 pm, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Recovering to fc39, restore gave me a bunch of    restore:: ftruncate: Bad file descrition errors.  Turned out something was corrupt in my Thunderbird directories.  (SMART errors = 0.) So I wanted to do an fsck on my partition

how to fsck at boot?

Hi All, Recovering to fc39, restore gave me a bunch of restore:: ftruncate: Bad file descrition errors. Turned out something was corrupt in my Thunderbird directories. (SMART errors = 0.) So I wanted to do an fsck on my partition. # fsck / -f fsck from util-linux 2.39.4

Re: fsck

Sorry for the disturbance, It was because fstab had btrfs > > Hello, > > file -Ls /dev/sdc5 > /dev/sdc5: Linux rev 1.0 ext4 filesystem data, > UUID=1ea2d462-244f-4959-9a62-99a7288aa38c, volume name "root_sec" (extents) > (64bit) (large files) (huge files) >

fsck

Hello, file -Ls /dev/sdc5 /dev/sdc5: Linux rev 1.0 ext4 filesystem data, UUID=1ea2d462-244f-4959-9a62-99a7288aa38c, volume name "root_sec" (extents) (64bit) (large files) (huge files) but fsck /dev/sdc5 fsck from util-linux 2.38.1 If you wish to check the consistency of a BTRFS fil

Re: fsck required?

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 07:05, wrote: > On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 21:09 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2022, at 11:24, andreas.fourn...@runbox.com wrote: > > > > > > Anyway so I have a laptop that only boots to emergency shell. There > > > journa

Re: fsck required?

On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 21:09 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Apr 21, 2022, at 11:24, andreas.fourn...@runbox.com wrote: > > > > Anyway so I have a laptop that only boots to emergency shell. There > > journalctl says that fsck failed with exit status 4 for > > /dev/

Re: fsck required?

On Apr 21, 2022, at 11:24, andreas.fourn...@runbox.com wrote: > > Anyway so I have a laptop that only boots to emergency shell. There > journalctl says that fsck failed with exit status 4 for > /dev/mapper/fedora-root > If I run fsck I only get back 'fsck from util-linux 2.3

fsck required?

. Now I was a bit distracted and doing other things at the same time so I don't actually remember if the software update was done or if it was about to start. Anyway so I have a laptop that only boots to emergency shell. There journalctl says that fsck failed with exit status 4 for /dev/map

Re: Problems with disk? apps failed, then reboot failed. Needed fsck

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 8:07 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Quick note: > > I am using SSD: > > fdisk -l /dev/sda > Disk /dev/sda: 465.76 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors > Disk model: WDC WDBNCE5000PN > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes /

Re: Problems with disk? apps failed, then reboot failed. Needed fsck

fortunately not too many such and found fsck which I ran on /dev/sda5 Lots of errors I let it fix and as you many guess I am now up and running. LibreOffice recovered the docs I had open. Thunderbird is opening folders. I guess other things are working, but 2 items. LibreOffice uploaded a

Re: Problems with disk? apps failed, then reboot failed. Needed fsck

d the disk recovery program started with 'f', fortunately not too many such and found fsck which I ran on /dev/sda5 Lots of errors I let it fix and as you many guess I am now up and running. LibreOffice recovered the docs I had open. Thunderbird is opening folders. I guess other things

Problems with disk? apps failed, then reboot failed. Needed fsck

fortunately not too many such and found fsck which I ran on /dev/sda5 Lots of errors I let it fix and as you many guess I am now up and running. LibreOffice recovered the docs I had open. Thunderbird is opening folders. I guess other things are working, but 2 items. LibreOffice uploaded a dump,

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

Thanks, Samuel and Jonathan. In fact, Jonathan is right: I installed Fedora with a Live Fedora disk. No, I do not want a fsck at every boot. Meanwhile, I did the following: tune2fs -c 100 -i 2m /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home In this way, a fsck will take place at the 100th boot or

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

On Oct 16, 2020, at 17:14, Paul Smith wrote: > > Dear All, > > I would like to run > > fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home > > on reboot. How can I accomplish this? According to this: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-f...@.serv

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

On Oct 16, 2020, at 18:43, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Then how did you get a volume with that name? What is it? I believe that’s the name of the volume group when you install from a Live Fedora disk. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- user

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

On 10/16/20 3:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:57 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: I would like to run fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home on reboot. How can I accomplish this? Is that the home partition on a live boot? You can try running: tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:57 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > I would like to run > > > > fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home > > > > on reboot. How can I accomplish this? > > Is that the home partition on a live boot? > > You can try

Re: How to fsck on reboot?

On 10/16/20 2:14 PM, Paul Smith wrote: I would like to run fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home on reboot. How can I accomplish this? Is that the home partition on a live boot? You can try running: tune2fs -E force_fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home

How to fsck on reboot?

Dear All, I would like to run fsck /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home on reboot. How can I accomplish this? Thanks in advance, Paul ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

/forcefsck is obsolete Modern file systems are expected to determine themselves if fsck is needed. XFS, ext4, btrfs, all can do log replay at mount time and that fixes the vast majority of problems. On XFS and Btrfs, if log replay has problems, mount will fail and it's expected the user man

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

Allegedly, on or about 6 August 2017, Ahmad Samir sent: > The root / filesystem isn't force-checked with /forcefsck; you'd have > to use fsck.mode=force kernel boot parameter. I tested that on a > clean > install in a vm. The other filesystems listed in fsck are checked >

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

> The root / filesystem isn't force-checked with /forcefsck; you'd have > to use fsck.mode=force kernel boot parameter. I tested that on a clean > install in a vm. The other filesystems listed in fsck are checked > AFAICS. Yes, I discovered that. All my filesystems w

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

md. It's handled by > dracut in the initramfs. > The root / filesystem isn't force-checked with /forcefsck; you'd have to use fsck.mode=force kernel boot parameter. I tested that on a clean install in a vm. The other filesystems listed in fsck are checked AFAICS. systemd is deprecatin

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

On 5/8/2017 2:35 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote: It used to have a value, but it was not that helpful and could be quite annoying. Back when hard drives were small, the occasional fsck was somewhat annoying. I'd really hate to be stuck waiting while the computer checks through a 500 GB drive,

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

On 08/04/2017 09:54 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote: Yes, apparently from the last checked date, it seems that /forcefsck worked but I was expecting to see something on the screen and it must be done hidden. Unless there's a problem, it will run very quickly. ___

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

On 08/04/2017 09:59 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote: Apparently the default value is -1 on my partitions which according to the manual means "If max-mount-counts is 0 or -1, the number of times the filesystem is mounted will be disregarded by e2fsck(8) and the kernel." So I guess that fsck i

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

mory serves. 0 no check, 1 first, 2 after first. Apparently the default value is -1 on my partitions which according to the manual means "If max-mount-counts is 0 or -1, the number of times the filesystem is mounted will be disregarded by e2fsck(8) and the kernel." So I guess that fsck

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

>> Touching /forcefsck was for sysvinit and upstart era. It is no longer >> valid >> for systemd. > > This is still valid and has nothing to do with systemd. It's handled by > dracut in the initramfs. Yes, apparently from the last checked date, it seems that /forcefsck worked but I was expecting

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

>>Apparently, this does not work: >># tune2fs -l /dev/sda >>tune2fs 1.43.3 (04-Sep-2016) >>tune2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda >>Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sda > > /dev/sda is usually a drive name, not a partition name. Does it work if you > try /dev/sd

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

On 08/04/2017 06:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Touching /forcefsck was for sysvinit and upstart era. It is no longer valid for systemd. This is still valid and has nothing to do with systemd. It's handled by dracut in the initramfs. ___ users mailing

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

you can set the priority in the fstab.. last column if memory serves. 0 no check, 1 first, 2 after first. There is no need for this and it always happens at the worst time. You do an emergency reboot for some reason and then you have to wait for a full fsck

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

>Apparently, this does not work: ># tune2fs -l /dev/sda >tune2fs 1.43.3 (04-Sep-2016) >tune2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda >Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sda /dev/sda is usually a drive name, not a partition name. Does it work if you try /dev/sda1 or /dev

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

> It probably ran and you didn't see it. For ext2/3/4, you can run >tune2fs -l /dev/{whatever} | grep "Last checked" Apparently, this does not work: # tune2fs -l /dev/sda tune2fs 1.43.3 (04-Sep-2016) tune2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda Found a gpt partition t

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

Frédéric Bron wrote on 08/04/2017 02:05 PM: I would like to force fsck at boot but I tried touch /forcefsck and it did not run or I did not see it (however the file /forcefsck disappeared). Thanks, Frédéric Add the following to the boot parameter: fsck.mode=force Touching /forcefsck was for

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

On 08/04/2017 12:05 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote: I would like to force fsck at boot but I tried touch /forcefsck and it did not run or I did not see it (however the file /forcefsck disappeared). It probably ran and you didn't see it. For ext2/3/4, you can run tune2fs -l /dev/{whatever} |

Re: F25: How to force fsck at boot?

I believe you could use tune2fs command sudo tune2fs -c 50 /dev/[your dev] the -c option set the interval of boots. Change it to 1 and it will check every boot... 30 I believe is the current default because every boot is impractical imo. I believe you can set the priority in the fstab.. last co

F25: How to force fsck at boot?

I would like to force fsck at boot but I tried touch /forcefsck and it did not run or I did not see it (however the file /forcefsck disappeared). Thanks, Frédéric ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F25 install old computer delayed after fsck

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Mayavimmer wrote: > I am trying to install F25 KDE 64 bit on an old HP Proliant with 2GB RAM > and a 2005 BIOS currently used in production (don't look at me, look at > the boss instead). The install is very very slow and took more than a > half

F25 install old computer delayed after fsck

I am trying to install F25 KDE 64 bit on an old HP Proliant with 2GB RAM and a 2005 BIOS currently used in production (don't look at me, look at the boss instead). The install is very very slow and took more than a half hour to fsck the 2TB raid 1 disks. I only initially want to install it

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

it's not the root filesystem. I don't know if it really matters, because systemd runs fsck. on the unmounted root no matter what. But in your case a 2 might cause fsck to run later than it is now. An additional option, which I use for /boot/efi, is mount option 'x-systemd.automount,noaut

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

Jan 17, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote: >> It is ext4 on /work > > OK so it's not root, which means you can just umount it and run e2fsck > without booting from alternate media. > > I can't tell from the journal output, which appears incomplete as it > has no m

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote: > It is ext4 on /work OK so it's not root, which means you can just umount it and run e2fsck without booting from alternate media. I can't tell from the journal output, which appears incomplete as it has no mention of the fsc

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/17/15 16:55, Kevin Wilson wrote: >> I should have mentioned also, that after fsck is completed, the >> following messages is displayed: >> Welcome to emergency mode! After logging in, type: >> "jou

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

t, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/17/15 16:55, Kevin Wilson wrote: >> I should have mentioned also, that after fsck is completed, the >> following messages is displayed: >> Welcome to emergency mode! After logging in, type: >> "journalctl -xb&

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Hello, > I had installed Fedora 21. Each time I boot the system, > fsck is running, which takes almost 5 minutes. > > What is the reason ? Can I avoid it ? It sounds like the file system isn't cleanly unmounting in a fai

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

On 01/17/15 16:55, Kevin Wilson wrote: > I should have mentioned also, that after fsck is completed, the > following messages is displayed: > Welcome to emergency mode! After logging in, type: > "journalctl -xb" to view system logs, > Give toot password for maintena

Re: fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

I should have mentioned also, that after fsck is completed, the following messages is displayed: Welcome to emergency mode! After logging in, type: "journalctl -xb" to view system logs, Give toot password for maintenance (or press Control-D to continue) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 a

fsck each time booting the system in Fedora 21

Hello, I had installed Fedora 21. Each time I boot the system, fsck is running, which takes almost 5 minutes. What is the reason ? Can I avoid it ? Regards, Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: F19 fsck problem [SOLVED]

On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:47:21 + Frank Murphy wrote: Apology for noise. I had to specify fsck.ext4 Which is something I never had to before. fsck just worked. ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription

F19 fsck problem

. _Fedora-16-x86_6: i_faddr for inode 2099910 (/var/cache/abrt-di/usr/src/debug/mesa-20130919/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_double_list.h) is 2942849248, should be zero. _Fedora-16-x86_6: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. (i.e., without -a or -p options) [root@localhost mapper

Re: How to disable fsck of root-filesystem at boot time?

On 17.04.2013 15:57, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run Fedora on a nilfs2 root-partition. > For now I only added the nilfs2-module to dracut.conf and it loads > fine up to the point where it tries to execute the non-existing > fsck.nilfs2. "nilfs2 on /" :) > Is there any way

Re: How to disable fsck of root-filesystem at boot time?

Am 17.04.2013 17:33, schrieb Clemens Eisserer: > Hi Harald, > >> man fstab for the last two columns >> UUID=b935b5db-0051-4f7f-83ac-6a6651fe0988 / ext4 0 0 > > Hmm, that alone didn't do the trick as / has to be mounted in order to > read /etc/fstab but READONLY, that is what the ro is for

Re: How to disable fsck of root-filesystem at boot time?

Hi Harald, > man fstab for the last two columns > UUID=b935b5db-0051-4f7f-83ac-6a6651fe0988 / ext4 0 0 Hmm, that alone didn't do the trick as / has to be mounted in order to read /etc/fstab. However I found out about an "fastboot" kernel option which seems to work well in combination with your

Re: How to disable fsck of root-filesystem at boot time?

Am 17.04.2013 15:57, schrieb Clemens Eisserer: > I would like to run Fedora on a nilfs2 root-partition. > For now I only added the nilfs2-module to dracut.conf and it loads > fine up to the point where it tries to execute the non-existing > fsck.nilfs2. > > Is there any way to disable the execu

How to disable fsck of root-filesystem at boot time?

Hi, I would like to run Fedora on a nilfs2 root-partition. For now I only added the nilfs2-module to dracut.conf and it loads fine up to the point where it tries to execute the non-existing fsck.nilfs2. Is there any way to disable the execution of fsck.nilfs2? Thanks, Clemens -- users mailing l

Re: Major fsck-up

On 04/02/2013 11:47 AM, Junk wrote: I think it might be to do with moving the start of the partition. I see from the docs that Parted can't move the start of an ext2 or ext3 partition so I'm guessing your home was ext4 or something amenable. Probably the moving of the start of a partition invo

Re: Major fsck-up

On 2 Apr 2013, at 19:21, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 04/02/2013 06:40 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: >> You probably need to be clear about exactly what you mean by added what >> was /boot to /home... >> >> What did the partition table look like before and after you did the work? >> >> was /boot before /hom

Re: Major fsck-up

On 02/04/13 19:09, Joe Zeff wrote: On 04/02/2013 01:22 AM, John Pilkington wrote: I don't know how different all this is from the latest-and-greatest but it might be relevant. I don't use any LVM, so probably not. Good luck with getting your laptop working again. I tried the Scientific Linu

Re: Major fsck-up

On 04/02/2013 06:40 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: You probably need to be clear about exactly what you mean by added what was /boot to /home... What did the partition table look like before and after you did the work? was /boot before /home and you enlarged /home to be /home+/boot (the partition befo

Re: Major fsck-up

On 04/02/2013 01:59 AM, Junk wrote: Firstly, your probably screwed. fsck has one job and that's to make the file system consistent. It's not a disaster recovery tool. All it cares about is that the fs should make sense on next reboot. If it were able to do that, I'd be OK.

Re: Major fsck-up

On 04/02/2013 01:22 AM, John Pilkington wrote: I don't know how different all this is from the latest-and-greatest but it might be relevant. I don't use any LVM, so probably not. Good luck with getting your laptop working again. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Major fsck-up

You probably need to be clear about exactly what you mean by added what was /boot to /home... What did the partition table look like before and after you did the work? was /boot before /home and you enlarged /home to be /home+/boot (the partition before /home?)? On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:39 PM,

Re: Major fsck-up

t have to use it. Does anybody know how to find > it, or otherwise recover the partition? I'm tempted to use touch /forcefsck, > to see if that works, but somehow, I doubt it. Advice, or pointers to > suggestions will be very, very welcome. > -- > Firstly, your probably screw

Re: Major fsck-up

On 02/04/13 00:39, Joe Zeff wrote: Well, I've managed to make matters worse on my desktop. Before doing a clean install, I decided to clean up my partitions a tad. There's an old partition that used to be /boot until new requirements made it too small and was just sitting there, unmounted, so I

Major fsck-up

Well, I've managed to make matters worse on my desktop. Before doing a clean install, I decided to clean up my partitions a tad. There's an old partition that used to be /boot until new requirements made it too small and was just sitting there, unmounted, so I used a LiveCD and Gparted to rem

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

That is what I though, when I read it during the session. Thanks for confirming that I had it right the first time. Update: the drive went back to Intel this week. They are sending me a new replacement. The service rep was telling me all about the 1.2 million hour MTBF spec as we completed th

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On 12/27/2011 10:42 PM, linux guy wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:54 AM, linux guy wrote: # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdb smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i686-linux-3.1.5-1.fc16.i686] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF READ SM

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:54 AM, linux guy wrote: > # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdb > smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i686-linux-3.1.5-1.fc16.i686] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART Self-t

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:25:40 -0700 linux guy wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > example http://www.hitachigst.com/support/downloads/#DFT > > > > Its an SSD - you want SSD tools from the vendor not random spinning rust > > tools. > > Thanks Allan. None of these tools a

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On 12/16/2011 02:25 PM, linux guy wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alan Cox wrote: example http://www.hitachigst.com/support/downloads/#DFT Its an SSD - you want SSD tools from the vendor not random spinning rust tools. Thanks Allan. None of these tools are finding anything wrong wi

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

# badblocks -vw /dev/sdb Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode From block 0 to 156290903 Testing with pattern 0xaa: done Reading and comparing: done Testing with pattern 0x55: done Reading and comparing: done Testing with pattern 0xff: done Reading and comparing: done Testing with pattern 0x00

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alan Cox wrote: example http://www.hitachigst.com/support/downloads/#DFT > > Its an SSD - you want SSD tools from the vendor not random spinning rust > tools. Thanks Allan. None of these tools are finding anything wrong with it. Badblocks has been finding noth

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

> > Thanks for the link. > > > > But fsck says the drive is clean and the SMART log says its clean as well. > > Fsck checks the filesystem for errors not the disk hardware. > The information fsck checks may be correct but sector referred to may not. > > You shou

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On 16 Dec 2011 at 9:15, linux guy wrote: Date sent: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:15:08 -0700 Subject:Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean From: linux guy To: Community support for Fedora users Send reply to

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:15:08 -0700 linux guy wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote: > > > > Take a look at ddrescue <http://www.gnu.org/s/ddrescue/ddrescue.html>. > > Thanks for the link. > > But fsck says the drive is clean and the

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote: > > Take a look at ddrescue <http://www.gnu.org/s/ddrescue/ddrescue.html>. Thanks for the link. But fsck says the drive is clean and the SMART log says its clean as well. Seems like something is mis writing data to the drive ?

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

linux guy wrote: > > How would I best do a command line copy such that it doesn't stop at > the files it can't read and it creates a log of them ? (What does cp > --force do ?) Take a look at ddrescue . GNU ddrescue is a data recovery tool. It copi

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

# smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdb smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i686-linux-3.1.5-1.fc16.i686] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_DescriptionS

Re: File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

I forgot to mention that all this started because of errors when booting, as previously reported by me in 2 other threads. # smartctl -i /dev/sdb smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i686-linux-3.1.5-1.fc16.i686] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net

File copy errors on EXT4 SSD but fsck says its clean ????

data drive. The drive is formatted EXT4. It has 3 partitions, /boot, swap and /. When I run fsck on it, it reports its clean. [root@server me]# fsck /dev/sdb1 fsck from util-linux 2.20.1 e2fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) /boot: clean, 300/150600 files, 178166/610436 blocks [root@server me]# fsck /dev

Re: fsck exits with error status, even though no errors are found

or fsck'ing >>>>>>>> the file systems, whatever script is doing that, >>>>>>>> is exiting with an error status, even though no >>>>>>>> errors are displayed, and I am prompted to either >>>>>>>&

Re: fsck exits with error status, even though no errors are found

that, >>>>>>> is exiting with an error status, even though no >>>>>>> errors are displayed, and I am prompted to either >>>>>>> enter the root password, or type Contrl-D to continue. >>>>>>> Cntrl-D simply reb

Re: fsck exits with error status, even though no errors are found

ugh no >>>>>> errors are displayed, and I am prompted to either >>>>>> enter the root password, or type Contrl-D to continue. >>>>>> Cntrl-D simply reboots. Entering the root password, >>>>>> and running fsck manually to check all

  1   2   >