On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 12:41, Tim via users
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 09:16 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> > In this forum and others, a lot of time and effort goes to dealing
> > with hardware support. When you buy a macOS or Windows system, you
> > don't expect problems getting the h
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 09:16 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> In this forum and others, a lot of time and effort goes to dealing
> with hardware support. When you buy a macOS or Windows system, you
> don't expect problems getting the hardware to work.
I do... I expect problems with Windows sy
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:29, ITwrx wrote:
> On 9/1/20 1:31 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > The devs seem amenable, but are vastly under-resourced IMO. For my
> money,
better Fedora support ==> more Redhat support contract adoption.
> >
> > But that's a corporate Redhat/IBM issue that they've yet to co
On 9/1/20 12:28 PM, ITwrx wrote:
> At roughly a billion $ a quarter in gross
> revenue(IIRC), i think Red Hat should double/triple down on Fedora and CentOS
it's a head-scratcher sometimes.
particularly when you _talk_ to really interested & capable devs in Fedora-land
-- many of whom _are_ RH/
On 9/1/20 1:31 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> The devs seem amenable, but are vastly under-resourced IMO. For my money,
> better Fedora support ==> more Redhat support contract adoption.
>
> But that's a corporate Redhat/IBM issue that they've yet to come to terms
> with and focus on. Unless you're a b
> Thanks for the detailed answer. Very useful. I've come to some of the same
> conclusions/solutions.
>
> I wanted to mention this source of friction since Fedora targets devs/ops
> people and they will expect that something as prevalent as a LEMP stack is a
> very smooth experience.
It shows
On 9/1/20 11:38 AM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> for 'fun', install composer from pkgs, and see what comes along for
> the ride! no thanks.
i think i remember that. :)
>
> i install the rpms, simply ignore the (admittedly annoying) installed apache
> dependencies, and then override the systemd unit,
Yes, th
On 9/1/20 8:05 AM, ITwrx wrote:
> Am i missing something about how people are using nginx and php
> together, or is this just legacy packaging defaults from a time when
> there was only apache, which haven't been reconsidered since then? If
> the latter, it would be nice if Fedora would reconsider
i was wondering why Fedora (and openSUSE) still use "apache" for the php
user (and "nginx" user for nginx) instead of using a generic "http" or
"www" user for php, apache and nginx like some other distros? When
running php under the "nginx" user, the session gets broken every time
php is updated, b
