On 08/28/2014 06:32 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the g
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
> It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the glue, and use that to put a dot on the
On 08/27/2014 07:10 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
The card was bought from Costco and I am not sure it
carries a warranty. I have had it for about a year.
I can understand that. I still wonder if the sensor is mechanical, or
optical. I've had optical sens
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
> The card was bought from Costco and I am not sure it
> carries a warranty. I have had it for about a year.
There probably is one, even if they don't mention it (one of those
consumer protection laws). Proving it, is the hard part. I keep
rece
On 08/27/2014 06:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Ahh I see. Not paying attention, I didn't realize you were formatting it in a
USB->SD Card adapter, and then transferring it to the built-in slot in the
laptop.
So I'd say it's worth trying a newer kernel, even grabbing a top of the list 3.17rc2
on
On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:00 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>
> Hi Chris,
> I found some cycles to try that out, though
> I knew full well it would lead nowhere, but still
> wanted to show you.
> I backed up the sd card and then inserted it into
> the usb adapter and reformatted it as ext4 and
> inserted it int
On 08/26/2014 09:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 1:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
/dev/mmcblk
What kernel version? There have been a pile of mmc related patches to
the kernel the last few months with more on the way. Thing is,
mkfs.exfat and your camera can obviously write to the card.
On 08/27/2014 05:21 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 26 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
I tried 1 layer of tape over the lock slider. More than 1 layer
of tape makes the card too hard to insert into the slot. It really
is a very tight does not seem to provide much play root.
Is the sensor optic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_blob
So you are telling me that inserting he card, mounting the card (auto
likely) and unmounting the card make no change?
that is strange
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
let us know how " sudo yum update " pans out.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:
Allegedly, on or about 26 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
> I tried 1 layer of tape over the lock slider. More than 1 layer
> of tape makes the card too hard to insert into the slot. It really
> is a very tight does not seem to provide much play root.
Is the sensor optical rather than physical? If so,
Allegedly, on or about 26 August 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
> Last, and actually most important, practically obsoleting the above
> two observations: this card is being used in a camera? The camera must
> be used to format it. That's what the camera manufacturer and the SD
> card manufacturer will te
On 08/26/2014 09:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 1:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
/dev/mmcblk
What kernel version? There have been a pile of mmc related patches to the
kernel the last few months with more on the way. Thing is, mkfs.exfat and your
camera can obviously write to the card.
On 08/26/2014 09:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Four observations:
1. The fsck.exfat command worked. So obviously the mkfs command and kernel
aren't seeing the wrong state of the card's physical lock switch. It sounds
like a weird bug that it then can't be mounted. Maybe try an explicit mount -t
On Aug 25, 2014, at 1:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> /dev/mmcblk
What kernel version? There have been a pile of mmc related patches to the
kernel the last few months with more on the way. Thing is, mkfs.exfat and your
camera can obviously write to the card. So it's not write protected or that
wouldn'
On 08/26/2014 06:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 12:10 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
It is a slider about 2mm or 2.5mm long and almost 1mm thick.
When in the up position (towards the corner which goes into the
controller) it is supposed to tell the controller write lock off
(disabled). But it is
Four observations:
1. The fsck.exfat command worked. So obviously the mkfs command and kernel
aren't seeing the wrong state of the card's physical lock switch. It sounds
like a weird bug that it then can't be mounted. Maybe try an explicit mount -t
without -o rw. I'd think if it's a bug it'd ha
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 12:10 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> It is a slider about 2mm or 2.5mm long and almost 1mm thick.
> When in the up position (towards the corner which goes into the
> controller) it is supposed to tell the controller write lock off
> (disabled). But it is not working in my machine beca
Hi again jd1008!
A couple of things:
1. Be careful with the Dust-Off - especially with a new can. Good to get
the tube so that it can be horizontal during the operation and do a short
"liquid clearing" spray before you go inside the bay. The liquid form is
hard on plastic I do believe. Be care
On 08/26/2014 04:19 AM, Tod Merley wrote:
fwiw
Googling " 03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822
SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 21) "
nets a whole bunch of linux problems threads
Another silly thought. Dust-Off the card reader bay. If the switch
position detection is opt
On 08/25/2014 10:45 PM, Tim wrote:
Tod Merley wrote:
my first guess
write protect switch (tab)
Could be what senses the switch position in the reader isn't working.
Are other cards mountable as writable, in the same reader?
On SD cards, it's not really a switch, there's no electronics behind
On 08/25/2014 10:26 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
jd1008 wrote:
" Later, I replaced my old laptop with a slightly newer one (Dell
Latitude E6500)
and I inserted the sd card in the dell laptop and always got automounted
read only.
As I had also mentioned, fc20 has no problem automounting it RW if I
u
On 08/25/2014 09:54 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
My card is a Samsung 32 EVO Micro SD HC I held in an SD adapter and
used and formatted by my Nikon camera.
[tmerley@localhost ~]$ journalctl -f
-- Logs begin at Mon 2014-08-25 06:16:28 PDT. --
Aug 25 20:28:07 localhost.localdomain dhclient[1015]: ...
.
On 08/25/2014 09:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/26/14 11:16, jd1008 wrote:
I had no problem using it on Linux after I had formatted it under windows as
exfat.
However, at tat time, I did not have a laptop with a working sdcard reader
built-in.
So I had used a USB sdcard reader/writer adapter,
fwiw
Googling " 03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822
SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 21) "
nets a whole bunch of linux problems threads
Another silly thought. Dust-Off the card reader bay. If the switch
position detection is optically based perhaps dust or dirt could become a
Tod Merley wrote:
>> my first guess
>> write protect switch (tab)
jd1008:
> I tried with the switch in the up and the down position and tried to
> mount.
> In both cases I am getting:
>
> WARN: `/dev/mmcblk0p1' is write-protected, mounting read-only.
Could be what senses the switch position in
jd1008 wrote:
" Later, I replaced my old laptop with a slightly newer one (Dell Latitude
E6500)
and I inserted the sd card in the dell laptop and always got automounted
read only.
As I had also mentioned, fc20 has no problem automounting it RW if I use the
USB sd card adapter. "
Well if you can s
Ed I simply wanted to show the process. I know - I knew - I thought it was
obvious - indeed it is.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/26/14 11:54, Tod Merley wrote:
> > /dev/mmcblk0p1 on /run/media/tmerley/NO_NAME type vfat
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1000,
I did add the word "exfat" to my original search line and results are
different but none seem on the mark.
Search term " sd exfat card will mount only read only fedora 20 "
Perhaps time to start looking at how other machines see the card - and how
other cards work formatted as you like in your af
On 08/26/14 11:54, Tod Merley wrote:
> /dev/mmcblk0p1 on /run/media/tmerley/NO_NAME type vfat
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1000,fmask=0022,dmask=0077,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,showexec,utf8,flush,errors=remount-ro,uhelper=udisks2)
Your card is formatted as vfat. So
My card is a Samsung 32 EVO Micro SD HC I held in an SD adapter and used
and formatted by my Nikon camera.
[tmerley@localhost ~]$ journalctl -f
-- Logs begin at Mon 2014-08-25 06:16:28 PDT. --
Aug 25 20:28:07 localhost.localdomain dhclient[1015]: ...
... ... [starting line just before SD card plug
On 08/26/14 11:16, jd1008 wrote:
> I had no problem using it on Linux after I had formatted it under windows as
> exfat.
> However, at tat time, I did not have a laptop with a working sdcard reader
> built-in.
> So I had used a USB sdcard reader/writer adapter, and Linux had no problems
> with it
On 08/25/2014 09:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/26/14 10:58, jd1008 wrote:
If I recall correctly, I had indeed originally formatted it as exfat on windows.
But after that I was found the rpmfusion exfat-utils and installed them on my
fc20.
I don't quite understand
Is the card currently f
On 08/26/14 10:58, jd1008 wrote:
> If I recall correctly, I had indeed originally formatted it as exfat on
> windows.
> But after that I was found the rpmfusion exfat-utils and installed them on my
> fc20.
I don't quite understand
Is the card currently formatted by Windows? If so, could y
On 08/25/2014 08:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/26/14 03:15, jd1008 wrote:
My flash card slot in the laptop is (per lspci):
03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host
Adapter (rev 21)
I insert into it a SanDisk 16GB Extreme SD card. This card is not marked as a
On 08/25/2014 05:58 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
well does seem to be a common thread:
https://www.google.com/search?q=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&oq=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&aqs=chrome..69i57.16787j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
So, one of the links claims
On 08/26/14 03:15, jd1008 wrote:
> My flash card slot in the laptop is (per lspci):
> 03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host
> Adapter (rev 21)
>
> I insert into it a SanDisk 16GB Extreme SD card. This card is not marked as a
> secure card.
> At least, it does n
The search link I provided probably has the story. This may well be a bug.
The "follow" of the journalctl I suggested would likely tell much more.
Searching the journal with such as " journalctl | grep e624 " or perhaps "
journalctl | grep mmc0 " might turn up additional hints (or other hints
fr
On 08/25/2014 05:58 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
well does seem to be a common thread:
https://www.google.com/search?q=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&oq=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&aqs=chrome..69i57.16787j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
- would love to see what
well does seem to be a common thread:
https://www.google.com/search?q=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&oq=sd+card+will+mount+only+read+only+fedora+20&aqs=chrome..69i57.16787j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
- would love to see what we do find.
Could you post the mount part of y
On 08/25/2014 01:49 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
> my first guess
> write protect switch (tab):
http://static.commentcamarche.net/en.kioskea.net/faq/images/0-hXBUyBSB-t555-1122-callout-s-.png
I tried with the switch in the up and the down position and tried to mount.
In both cases I am getting:
WAR
my first guess:
write protect switch (tab):
http://static.commentcamarche.net/en.kioskea.net/faq/images/0-hXBUyBSB-t555-1122-callout-s-.png
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
> My flash card slot in the laptop is (per lspci):
> 03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 S
My flash card slot in the laptop is (per lspci):
03:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro
Host Adapter (rev 21)
I insert into it a SanDisk 16GB Extreme SD card. This card is not marked
as a secure card.
At least, it does not say so on the card.
It gets automounte
42 matches
Mail list logo
