Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:02:39PM -0700, jd1008 wrote: > How about updating f20 to 21 with > yum -y upgrade --releasever=21 > Would that work? Probably -- see the caveats at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_package_manager. Additionally, old releases are moved off of the mir

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On 11/18/2016 01:02 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 11/18/2016 01:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> 20 -> 21 >>> 21 -> 22 >>> 22 -> 23 >>> 23 -> 24 >>> 24 -> 25 >>> The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chance

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On 11/18/2016 01:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 20 -> 21 21 -> 22 22 -> 23 23 -> 24 24 -> 25 The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chances The dnf system update plugin was added as an update to F21, so

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > 20 -> 21 > 21 -> 22 > 22 -> 23 > 23 -> 24 > 24 -> 25 > The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chances The dnf system update plugin was added as an update to F21, so it's only the first hop that will be d

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:28:09AM +, Gary Stainburn wrote: > As someone who has a F21 server that I was just thinking of fedup'ing, So, not that this is recommended, but Adam Williamson recently posted about successfully upgrading from Fedora 13 to Fedora 25. So... this is possible. You're ju

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

Allegedly, on or about 15 November 2016, Gary Stainburn sent: > As someone who has a F21 server that I was just thinking of fedup'ing, > what would be my best choice? (I really don't want to do a clean > install) I really just cannot imagine going through several updates-over-the-top, to get fro

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 12:35 +0100, luca paganotti wrote: > Sure, fedup doesn't edit my scripts, but should update my system ... Neither Fedup nor dnf is guaranteed to work when skipping versions, so to get from 20 to 24 (or 25) you will probably have to do several stages: 20 -> 21 21 -> 22 22 ->

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

Sure, fedup doesn't edit my scripts, but should update my system ... On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 11:07 +, luca.pagano...@gmail.com wrote: > > If I have to make my machine from scratch, I'm thinking to switch to > debian after twen

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 11:07 +, luca.pagano...@gmail.com wrote: > If I have to make my machine from scratch, I'm thinking to switch to debian > after twenty years of fedora usage ... Your choice of course. Using Fedora means being prepared to upgrade your system at least every year. If you are

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

If I have to make my machine from scratch, I'm thinking to switch to debian after twenty years of fedora usage ... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

Hi Patrick, thank you for your answer. I've tons of script an personal data and programs, isn't there a way to gradually upgrate to the latest release? I do not want to loos e any of my personal data and configurations, is it enough to backup my home folder? I've databasese and so on ... I should t

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tuesday 15 November 2016 10:14:46 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The current release of Fedora is 24, and will be 25 in the next few > days (maybe even today). 20 and 21 stopped receiving any support a long > time ago. Fedup is no longer even used as the upgrade method. In your > situation you are

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:07 +, luca.pagano...@gmail.com wrote: > fedup upgrade stuck at "Welcome to fedup-dracut-0.9.0!" > > after moving mounts into /system-upgrade-root > /boot/efi > /boot > and /home > upgrade prep complete, switching to root ... > > Welcome to fedup-dracut-0.9.0! > > no

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

fedup upgrade stuck at "Welcome to fedup-dracut-0.9.0!" after moving mounts into /system-upgrade-root /boot/efi /boot and /home upgrade prep complete, switching to root ... Welcome to fedup-dracut-0.9.0! no other life signal ... what to do? ___ users

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

I've found two folders /var/lib/system-upgrade containing a .conf file and /var/cache/system/upgrade containing the new packages. Can I symlink these two folders? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to us

Re: fedup from 20 to 21

The command I issue is sudo fedup --network 21 --product=workstation ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedup to F22 issues

On 02/11/15 11:41, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 10/31/2015 01:53 AM, Stephen Davies wrote: On 31/10/15 12:32, Stephen Davies wrote: 1. PostgreSQL databases were not upgraded from 9.3 to 9.4 and subsequent attempts to do this manually fail due to locale differences (AU vs US). (I have requested hel

Re: fedup to F22 issues

On 10/31/2015 01:53 AM, Stephen Davies wrote: On 31/10/15 12:32, Stephen Davies wrote: 1. PostgreSQL databases were not upgraded from 9.3 to 9.4 and subsequent attempts to do this manually fail due to locale differences (AU vs US). (I have requested help on the PostgreSQL list). I think you w

Re: fedup to F22 issues

On 31/10/15 12:32, Stephen Davies wrote: I have just run fedup --network 22 and have several issues as a result. 1. PostgreSQL databases were not upgraded from 9.3 to 9.4 and subsequent attempts to do this manually fail due to locale differences (AU vs US). (I have requested help on the Postgre

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On 10/07/2015 09:55 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:18:27PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: running updated 21. fedup --network 22 Preparation seemed to go well: [ 191.911] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue Oct 6 12:26:25 2015 Rebooted. Died somew

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On 10/07/2015 11:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/06/2015 07:18 PM, sean darcy wrote: running updated 21. fedup --network 22 Preparation seemed to go well: [ 191.911] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue Oct 6 12:26:25 2015 Rebooted. Died somewhere in upgrading.

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On 10/06/2015 07:18 PM, sean darcy wrote: running updated 21. fedup --network 22 Preparation seemed to go well: [ 191.911] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue Oct 6 12:26:25 2015 Rebooted. Died somewhere in upgrading. Is there any log of the upgrade ? No new kern

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:57:18PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > On 10/07/2015 09:55 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:18:27PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > >>running updated 21. > >> > >>fedup --network 22 > >> > >>Preparation seemed to go well: > >> > >> > >>[ 191.911]

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:57:18 -0400 sean darcy wrote: > dnf thinks I'm on fc21. > > dnf upgrade > Using metadata from Mon Oct 5 17:27:37 2015 (1 day, 19:25:15 hours > old) Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > > So using dnf won't help. > > fedora-release-22-1 is installed: > >

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On 10/07/2015 09:55 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:18:27PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: running updated 21. fedup --network 22 Preparation seemed to go well: [ 191.911] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue Oct 6 12:26:25 2015 Rebooted. Died somew

Re: fedup leaves me stuck between 21 and 22

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:18:27PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > running updated 21. > > fedup --network 22 > > Preparation seemed to go well: > > > [ 191.911] (II) fedup:() /usr/bin/fedup exiting cleanly at Tue Oct > 6 12:26:25 2015 > > Rebooted. > > Died somewhere in upgrading. Is th

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/18/2015 08:13 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. Going the route of first installing f21 and th

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 06:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. Going the route of first installing f21 and then f22 is way too long (i.e. time consuming, du

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 07:19 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Less useful than I hoped, but I missed this from your first message: /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 r

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data,

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Less useful than I hoped, but I missed this from your first message: /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 05:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Well, you really should be using "dnf repolist", but it's pretty obvious you have F20 repos for the most part. On a mostly-Fedora-20 system, I wouldn't expect dnf to be installed. Your machine is in a weird state, so these are somewhat draconian me

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data, : local, merge-conf, post-transaction

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data, : local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, priorities, protectbase, re

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

Hi On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > > If that were true, wouldn't he be seeing rawhide packages in his regular > updates? > > Only if he let it remain enables as opposed to cherry picking updates by temporarily enabling for a single update session. If you do such things, runn

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/16/2015 10:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I know you said that rawhide isn't enabled, but that's really the only likely explanation. You may have installed or enabled some rawhide repository to fetch the kernel src.rpm, and now yum related tools will pull packages from that repository. If

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: So, my question remains: Why fc23 yum repolist I know you said that rawhide isn't enabled, but that's really the only likely explanation. You may have installed or enabled some rawhide repository to fetch the kernel src.rpm, and now yum related too

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/15/2015 04:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r--

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/16/15 07:26, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> The correct update from F21 to F22 is: >>> >>> fedup --network 22 >>> >>> fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a >>> supported option since F21. >>> >>> Also check your repos.d files an

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. Hi Rick, None of rawhide

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/15/2015 04:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid

Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!

On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd

Re: Fedup half-complete

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:14:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I followed the instructions at > > to upgrade my second-best laptop from Fedora-21 to 22. > The upgrade failed halfway through with memory warnings of some type. Isn't "memory w

Re: Fedup half-complete

On 08/23/15 19:14, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I followed the instructions at > > to upgrade my second-best laptop from Fedora-21 to 22. > The upgrade failed halfway through with memory warnings of some type. > I ran fedora-upgrade again, and

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

Tried the Fedora 22 Live KDE dvd I created just to see if it would come up Well, its X - KDE had the same rendering problem. Foreground images do not fully refresh their part of the screen. As said previously, X applications launched from "remote" machines run just fine on the remote machine.

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

I might add that logging in remotely to this machine and then launching an X-application that displays on the remote machine works. So, it seems to be purely a X rendering issue on the machine, the X protocol works fine. Richard On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: > I used to up

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

I am not using the nvidia card. I am using nouveau. # /usr/sbin/akmods --force No akmod packages found, nothing to do.[ OK ] > rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME} %{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{ARCH}\n' | grep kmod akmods 0.5.4-1.fc22 noarch kmodtool 1-23.fc22 noarch libmikmod 3.3.7-1.fc22 x86_6

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

On 08/08/2015 09:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: I used to update: > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KDE X does not render properly. With right click I a small box appears under the cursor, navigating to what I guess is the first menu item, I

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

On 07/28/15 11:41, richard emberson wrote: > ]# journalctl -b 0 | grep -i mouse > Jul 27 19:52:02 localhost.localdomain kernel: mousedev: PS/2 mouse device > common for all mice > Jul 27 19:52:02 localhost.localdomain kernel: usb 7-1: Product: USB Optical > Mouse > Jul 27 19:52:02 localhost.local

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

On 07/28/15 10:57, richard emberson wrote: > See below > > On 07/27/2015 07:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 07/28/15 09:50, richard emberson wrote: >>> >>> grep "input device" /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep XINPUT >>> >>> >>> Its a Jetta laptop with touch pad (which, like the usb optical mouse, also >

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

On 07/28/15 09:50, richard emberson wrote: > > grep "input device" /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep XINPUT > > > Its a Jetta laptop with touch pad (which, like the usb optical mouse, also > does not work) and builtin keyboard. What is in your /etc/X11/xorg.conf ? It should only contain # RPM Fu

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

On 07/27/15 08:00, Rich Emberson wrote: > Still no mouse or keyboard. Don't know if this is the problem. > > from /var/log/Xorg.0.log Well, the /dev/fb0 is not related to your keyboard/mouse problem since that device is a "frame buffer" which is related to video. My reason for suggesting what I

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

On 07/27/15 08:00, Rich Emberson wrote: > Still no mouse or keyboard. Don't know if this is the problem. > > from /var/log/Xorg.0.log > START > [96.019] (II) Loading sub module "fb" > [96.019] (II) LoadModule: "fb" > [96.020] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so > [96.030]

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> 22 -> Plasma closed unexpectedly

On 07/25/2015 07:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: After reboot, login from a different machine and create a fresh user. Then login as that new user to see if you have the same issue. Either that or simply change to a text console without logging in at the GUI. And, while you're at it, activate the

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> 22 -> Plasma closed unexpectedly

On 07/26/15 09:51, Rich Emberson wrote: > X starts but there is no mouse control (pointer on screen > but the mouse does not move it) and after a minute or > less I get an widget stating that the Plasma desktop > closed unexpectedly. > > I have to login from another machine to do a reboot. You're

Re: fedup 20 -> 21 -> No X

On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:37:10 -0700 Rich Emberson wrote: > Ah, fedora upgrades using fedup ... > > Starting with Fedora 20, did > > yum update > and then > > fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct > Took a while but there were no issues but > remember, as root > > export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/b

Re: Fedup to F22: No "System Upgrade" in GRUB menu [solved ...]

On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Rick Stevens wrote: On 06/03/2015 03:12 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 06/03/2015 02:44 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > [...] Thanks for the quick reply. I repeated the process per your correction. However, my bootloader reads somethin

Re: Fedup to F22: No "System Upgrade" in GRUB menu

On 06/03/2015 03:12 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Rick Stevens wrote: On 06/03/2015 02:44 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, I tried to upgrade an x86_64 Intel desktop today per the instructions located here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with

Re: Fedup to F22: No "System Upgrade" in GRUB menu

On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Rick Stevens wrote: On 06/03/2015 02:44 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, I tried to upgrade an x86_64 Intel desktop today per the instructions located here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F and having successfully done

Re: Fedup to F22: No "System Upgrade" in GRUB menu

On 06/03/2015 02:44 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, I tried to upgrade an x86_64 Intel desktop today per the instructions located here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F and having successfully done an i386 Dell laptop recently. On reboot, there

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/17/2015 12:32 PM, Dan Mossor wrote: On 04/17/2015 11:48 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine u

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/17/2015 11:48 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and faile

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/17/2015 01:48 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and fai

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Pl

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the messa

Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download

On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: > I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was > fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package > (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any > advice is welcome. > > Thank

Re: fedup to 22

On 04/13/15 09:14, jd1008 wrote: > Has anyone run fedup to 22? > > If yes, any problems with f22? Since F22 is only in Beta testing, you're question would best be asked on the testing list -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedo

Re: fedup to 22

Only problem with 22 I've run into so far is that there's something wrong with NFS. Otherwise, everything seems to be fine. On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: > Has anyone run fedup to 22? > > If yes, any problems with f22? > > Thanx. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedorapr

Re: Fedup troubles

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 06:49:48PM +, Beartooth wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:03:07 -0700, Greg Woods wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys [root@localhost ~]# > >> > >> Clue, please? > >> > >> > > I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo

Re: Fedup troubles

On 12/30/14 14:51, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-29 15:03, Greg Woods wrote: Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys [root@localhost ~]# Clue, please? I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup. I ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of th

Re: Fedup issues

On 2014-12-29 18:39, Robin Laing wrote: Overall, I say that this worked pretty good. F19 to F21 Encrypted laptop using FedUp following the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp One issue with shutdown which is a reported bug. om the wiki, went well until the shutdown. Left it as we wer

Re: Fedup troubles

On 2014-12-29 15:03, Greg Woods wrote: Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys [root@localhost ~]# Clue, please? I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup. I ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of the risks of doing that) so that I could g

Re: Fedup troubles

On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:03:07 -0700, Greg Woods wrote: >> >> >> Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys [root@localhost ~]# >> >> Clue, please? >> >> > I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup. > I ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of the risks

Re: Fedup issues

On 2014-12-29 18:39, Robin Laing wrote: Overall, I say that this worked pretty good. ... Machine 2. Dual boot, Win 8.1 / Fedora. While running fedup, is stuck at the end. Before the shutdown and reboot. Don't know what happened but after two hours of sitting there, I shut down. On reboot

Re: Fedup troubles

> > > > Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys > [root@localhost ~]# > > Clue, please? > I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup. I ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of the risks of doing that) so that I could get fedup to complete. Once I had

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/11/2014 06:21 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> We're talking about fedup doing its thing after rebooting into the >> upgrade kernel. It appears that the sysrq is enabled in the upgrade >> kernel, and I do believe that I accurately explained

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On 12/11/2014 03:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: So… Has anyone been able to update a LUKS-encrypted system, without getting stuck at the end? I couldn't find anything in Bugzilla. Yes. I've updated two F20 systems with LUKS-encrypted LVM backed filesystems using fedup. Felix already reporte

Re: Fedup 20 to 21 - Gnome fails to start

On 12/11/2014 07:51 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, < wrote: I used fedup to move from F20 to F21 on two PCs. Both have Asus EN210 Nvidia graphics cards. In both cases, starting gnome would result in an error which reads " a problem has occured and the

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On 12/11/2014 06:21 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: We're talking about fedup doing its thing after rebooting into the upgrade kernel. It appears that the sysrq is enabled in the upgrade kernel, and I do believe that I accurately explained that sysrq did produce a response; unfortunately the response

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

Joe Zeff writes: On 12/11/2014 03:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I forgot about reboot -f. sysrq+s did not do anything; sysrq+u made the entire console output from the entire installation process, from start to finish, scroll through the console at warp speed, looping 3-4 times, which was highly

Re: Fedup 20 to 21 - Gnome fails to start

Hi On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, < wrote: > I used fedup to move from F20 to F21 on two PCs. Both have Asus EN210 > Nvidia graphics cards. In both cases, starting gnome would result in an > error which reads " a problem has occured and the system can't recover." I > reinstalled the akmod nvidi

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On 12/11/2014 03:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I forgot about reboot -f. sysrq+s did not do anything; sysrq+u made the entire console output from the entire installation process, from start to finish, scroll through the console at warp speed, looping 3-4 times, which was highly amusing to watch;

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

Chris Murphy writes: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Morgan mmor...@dca.net> wrote: I ran into a hang like BZ 1160079 while upgrading from F20 on a similar setup yesterday. I didn't have any issues with disk space but the reboot did get stuck on the L

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Morgan wrote: > I ran into a hang like BZ 1160079 while upgrading from F20 on a similar > setup yesterday. I didn't have any issues with disk space but the reboot > did get stuck on the LUKS container when trying to unmount sysroot. > Power cycling at that

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

I ran into a hang like BZ 1160079 while upgrading from F20 on a similar setup yesterday. I didn't have any issues with disk space but the reboot did get stuck on the LUKS container when trying to unmount sysroot. Power cycling at that point was a bit frightening but the system came back up without

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

Am 10.12.2014 um 04:17 schrieb Robin Laing: > In the past, using fedup was a disaster due to encrypted systems. > > Is this working in F21? > > Don't use LVM's and partitions are encrypted using LUKS. This includes /tmp > swap. /boot isn't encrypted. It worked for me, I upgraded from F20->F21 a

Re: fedup??

On 09.11.2014 22:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Beartooth wrote: > >> >> By "unofficial fedora-upgrade tool" I suppose you mean "yum >> upgrade"? I've seen posts about it, but never tried it myself. >> > > No > > $ sudo dnf info yum-upgrade > > Avai

Re: fedup??

Hi On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Beartooth wrote: > > By "unofficial fedora-upgrade tool" I suppose you mean "yum > upgrade"? I've seen posts about it, but never tried it myself. > No $ sudo dnf info yum-upgrade Available Packages Name: fedora-upgrade Arch: noarch Ep

Re: fedup??

On 11/10/14 02:31, Beartooth wrote: > However, I've never touched an Alpha before, and I'm stunned at > having no problems, so far . I guess what I'm after is any > clue on whether I'm better off putting my Beta install medium into the > Alpha machine, or simply running fedup on it. Or, I suppos

Re: fedup??

On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 14:23:49 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 11/08/2014 02:08 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> "yum install fedup" actually does something, without complaining. >> But does Fedora still use fedup?? If not, what? I'd expected this list >> to be abuzz by now with posts about upgrading, but I

Re: fedup??

On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 06:23 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > I've put time and effort into tweaking, and would prefer > > upgrading in a way that would keep that, if I can. > > > > F21 hasn't been released yet. That will happen in early December. > fedup will be used. At the moment the fedup

Re: fedup??

On 11/09/14 06:08, Beartooth wrote: > I bollixed one PC so badly, a week or two ago, that I gave up on > repair and just installed F21 Alpha (from a live CD). I've been very > pleased with it. > > Nevertheless, I suppose, I really ought to upgrade. > > "yum install fedup" actua

Re: fedup??

On 11/08/2014 02:08 PM, Beartooth wrote: "yum install fedup" actually does something, without complaining. But does Fedora still use fedup?? If not, what? I'd expected this list to be abuzz by now with posts about upgrading, but I don't see them. Are things in general really going so swim

Re: Fedup 17 to 18 worked, now fedup to 19 fails

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:35:49 +0100 Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hi folks. > > I'm currently doing this on a local box before moving onto doing it > on a remote virtual server set. I fedup'd from 17 to 18 with only > the one problem where I had to manuall run 'yum clean all' to get > things finished.

Re: Fedup 19 to 20 problems

On 27/09/14 02:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:03:18 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: Ran Fedup today to upgrade my 19 system to 20 - all the packages are downloaded, the fedup kernel is installed...and I have 2 new selections of the grub screen fedup and fedup rescue. Howeve

Re: Fedup 19 to 20 problems

On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:03:18 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > >Ran Fedup today to upgrade my 19 system to 20 - all the packages > are downloaded, the fedup kernel is installed...and I have 2 new > selections of the grub screen fedup and fedup rescue. However neither > will complete the boot so

Re: Fedup issue with thunderbird

On 04/23/2014 08:48 AM, Steven Stern wrote: On 04/23/2014 06:40 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote: I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving me a pile of weird permission errors and disk spac

Re: Fedup issue with thunderbird

On 04/23/2014 08:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/23/14 19:40, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote: I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving me a pile of weird permission errors and disk space err

Re: Fedup issue with thunderbird

On 04/23/14 19:40, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote: > I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well > except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving me a > pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is 215GB free > space, so I

Re: Fedup issue with thunderbird

On 04/23/2014 06:40 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote: > I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well > except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving > me a pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is > 215GB free space, so

  1   2   3   4   5   >