On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 14:00 -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
> And if you want your music without interruptions (os or mail beeps)
> - I assume that is easily configurable?
Even on the old one-thing-at-a-time sound system, you couldn't really do
that. e.g. You'd start playing music, and at some stage a
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 20:23 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> > Of course a blog is exactly the right forum for those kinds of broad
> > based, opinion diatribes while the list is exactly the wrong place but
> > one thing that seems to be consist
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
> Of course a blog is exactly the right forum for those kinds of broad
> based, opinion diatribes while the list is exactly the wrong place but
> one thing that seems to be consistent between people like Karl and
> Marcel (and his previous ident
On Sunday 14 March 2010 06:00:08 pm Mail Lists wrote:
> On 03/14/2010 01:41 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > Linux has had sound devices and drivers since way back but the software
> > had always laid claim to the devices directly which didn't permit things
> > like alert sounds sent by the OS when you w
On 03/14/2010 01:41 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> Linux has had sound devices and drivers since way back but the software
> had always laid claim to the devices directly which didn't permit things
> like alert sounds sent by the OS when you were say playing music or
> watching youtube or whatever.
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 12:48 -0400, Raymond C. Rodgers wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 06:26 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
> > I use Fedora. I even somewhat like Fedora. Apart from the fact that I'm
> > taking my data into my hands with every release (from 11 to 12 I lost all my
> > data on trying to upgrade)
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 16:43 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 14 March 2010 03:29:40 pm Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > In another post, Tim has pondered if we aren't seeking the emergence of
> > > "Karl 3.0". An update, Karl is ali
On 03/13/2010 06:26 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:21:35 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>> In thread starting with
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-March/367987.html
>>
>> I stated a skewer of bugs. Geeks answered it was normal to have bugs
>> like,
On Sunday 14 March 2010 03:29:40 pm Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > In another post, Tim has pondered if we aren't seeking the emergence of
> > "Karl 3.0". An update, Karl is alive and well and dispensing
> > questionable advice on the Ubuntu l
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I've reported a number of bugs to the Fedora BZ and most of them have
> > been resolved. None of them have been ignored. Without knowing exactly
> > what bugs you reported or how you documented them, there's not m
On Sunday 14 March 2010 09:19:34 am Ed Greshko wrote:
> For my part, the OP may end up in the same file as Karl did. But I'm of
> 2 minds. I really don't read any of his rants...I gloss over any actual
> requests for help (see above) yet it is kind of like watching NASCAR.
> Sure the race in inte
On Sunday 14 March 2010 05:07:53 am Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 04:56 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 March 2010 04:10:42 am Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:26 -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> > > > Unresolved. IE, still broken three re
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've reported a number of bugs to the Fedora BZ and most of them have
> been resolved. None of them have been ignored. Without knowing exactly
> what bugs you reported or how you documented them, there's not much else
> one can say.
>
I wish some people were able to
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 04:56 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 14 March 2010 04:10:42 am Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:26 -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> > > Unresolved. IE, still broken three releases later.
> >
> > IE?
>
> Short for "Id Est". You know, Latin acr
On Sunday 14 March 2010 04:10:42 am Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:26 -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> > Unresolved. IE, still broken three releases later.
>
> IE?
Short for "Id Est". You know, Latin acronyms... ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_phrases:_I#id_e
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:21:35 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
> I use Fedora. I even somewhat like Fedora.
I suppose we do. Otherwise, we'd be using another distro. Does this
mean that, because maybe 20% of the 1% Linux users on the net use R
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:26 -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> I no longer bother submitting bugs to Fedora.
> It is true that in some of the bugs I submitted I did not provide
> enough
> information. However, in the bugs that I did, they just languished
> completely
> until the software was EOLed
On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:24:09 pm David wrote:
> Perhaps you should search for a distribution that works for your needs
> if you are so dissatisfied with Fedora?
It's like capitalism. it's the worst distro out there, except for all the
others.
I didn't say I was dissatisfied with Fedora.
On 3/13/2010 6:26 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:21:35 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> In thread starting with
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-March/367987.html
>>
>> I stated a skewer of bugs. Geeks answered it was normal to have bugs
>> like, for at l
On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:21:35 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
> In thread starting with
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-March/367987.html
>
> I stated a skewer of bugs. Geeks answered it was normal to have bugs
> like, for at least 2 years now, "New Files" entering the clipboa
20 matches
Mail list logo
